GNU bug report logs - #34756
26.1.92; Minor typos across manuals

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
Subject: bug#34756: closed (Re: bug#34756: 26.1.92; Minor typos across
 manuals)
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:45:04 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#34756: 26.1.92; Minor typos across manuals

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 34756 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
34756: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34756
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 34756-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#34756: 26.1.92; Minor typos across manuals
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:44:12 +0000

fixed 34756 26.2
quit

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
>> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 08:41:21 +0000
>> 
>> Are the three attached patches acceptable for the emacs-26 branch?
>
> Documentation changes should always go to the release branch, unless
> they document features only available on master.
>
>> If so, should I add this bug number to all or none of them?
>
> It's okay to push all of them under the same bug number, and even in a
> single commit.  There's no need to distinguish between changes that
> correct typos, they are all "alike" for all practical purposes.

Thanks for clarifying, I've now pushed to the release branch.  Let me
know if anything is amiss, e.g. if signed commits are frowned upon.

-- 
Basil

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 26.1.92; Minor typos across manuals
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 08:41:21 +0000

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Severity: minor
Tags: patch

[0001-Fix-some-plural-Message-IDs-typos-in-Gnus-docs.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0002-Fix-possessive-it-s-its-typos-in-manuals.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[0003-Fix-an-other-another-typos-in-manuals.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[Message part 8 (text/plain, inline)]

Are the three attached patches acceptable for the emacs-26 branch?
If so, should I add this bug number to all or none of them?

Thanks,

-- 
Basil

In GNU Emacs 26.1.92 (build 5, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
 of 2019-03-05 built on thunk
Repository revision: 52fd40068e0f8b41bd29eaec1334299eb86d0bff
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12003000
System Description:	Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.