GNU bug report logs - #34753
CC Mode 5.33.1; Inconsistent formatting in (ccmode) Config Basics

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#34753: closed (CC Mode 5.33.1; Inconsistent formatting in
 (ccmode) Config Basics)
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 18:54:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 8 Mar 2019 18:47:04 +0000
with message-id <20190308184704.GA28862 <at> ACM>
and subject line Re: bug#34753: CC Mode 5.33.1; Inconsistent formatting in (ccmode) Config Basics
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34753,
regarding CC Mode 5.33.1; Inconsistent formatting in (ccmode) Config Basics
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
34753: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34753
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
To: submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: CC Mode 5.33.1; Inconsistent formatting in (ccmode) Config Basics
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 23:19:46 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Severity: minor

[2019-03-04-cc-mode-config-basics-html.png (image/png, attachment)]

[2019-03-04-cc-mode-config-basics-info-before.png (image/png, attachment)]

[2019-03-04-cc-mode-config-basics-info-after.png (image/png, attachment)]

[Message part 7 (text/plain, inline)]

The settings precedence list in '(ccmode) Config Basics' seems to be
misformatted, and is also inconsistent with other itemised lists in the
manual w.r.t. the type of bullet point used.

It seems to be written as a two-column table nested within a list, but
without utilising the second column.  Furthermore, the first item is
indented/bulleted differently to the rest of the items.  Is this
intentional?  If so, why?

Would the following change be suitable for the emacs-26 branch?

[cc-mode.diff (text/x-diff, inline)]

diff --git a/doc/misc/cc-mode.texi b/doc/misc/cc-mode.texi
index 1a77a64e01..151b460f7f 100644
--- a/doc/misc/cc-mode.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/cc-mode.texi
@@ -2282,15 +2282,15 @@ Config Basics
 
 If you make conflicting settings in several of these ways, the way
 that takes precedence is the one that appears latest in this list:
-@itemize @w{}
-@item
-@table @asis
+
+@itemize @bullet
 @item Style
-@itemx File Style <at> footnote{In earlier versions of @ccmode{}, a File Style setting took precedence over any other setting apart from a File Local Variable setting.}
-@itemx Top-level command or ``customization interface''
-@itemx Hook
-@itemx File Local Variable setting
-@end table
+@item File Style <at> footnote{In earlier versions of @ccmode{}, a File Style
+setting took precedence over any other setting apart from a File Local
+Variable setting.}
+@item Top-level command or ``customization interface''
+@item Hook
+@item File Local Variable setting
 @end itemize
 
 Here is a summary of the different ways of writing your configuration

[Message part 9 (text/plain, inline)]

I also attach three screenshots.  The first two show how the list is
currently rendered in HTML[1] and Info-mode, respectively.  The third
shows the Info-mode rendering following my suggested patch.

[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/ccmode/Config-Basics.html

Thanks,

-- 
Basil

Emacs: GNU Emacs 26.1.92 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
 of 2019-02-26
Package: CC Mode 5.33.1 (C/*l)

[Message part 10 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
Cc: 34753-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#34753: CC Mode 5.33.1; Inconsistent formatting in (ccmode)
 Config Basics
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 18:47:04 +0000

Hello, Basil,

I've just committed a patch to the emacs-26 branch to fix this bug, and
am closing it.

Basically, I've used the change you suggested, except it doesn't use
@bullet, and it's now one of two versions of the construct, alongside the
old version for Texinfo 4.x.  I believe there is a bug in Texinfo 6.6
which caused the misalignment.

I also fixed a minor glitch earlier on in cc-mode.texi.

Thanks again for the report.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 17:26:00 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 23:19:46 +0000, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote:
> > Severity: minor

> > The settings precedence list in '(ccmode) Config Basics' seems to be
> > misformatted, and is also inconsistent with other itemised lists in the
> > manual w.r.t. the type of bullet point used.

> Yes, that list _is_ misformatted.  I hadn't noticed that before.  It may
> be a bug in the perl versions of makeinfo, possibly just in the more
> recent versions of it.

> I don't see this list being inconsistent with anything, since there is
> no other similar list in the CC Mode manual to compare it with.  This
> list is a list of _things_, where each item is short and to the point.
> The other lists are lists of procedures, conditions, processes, etc.,
> which are much longer and more rambling.  The lack of bullets in this
> list is deliberate, since they could detract from the readability of the
> list.  Bullets would break up the sequence of things too much.  Sort of.

> > It seems to be written as a two-column table nested within a list, but
> > without utilising the second column.  Furthermore, the first item is
> > indented/bulleted differently to the rest of the items.  Is this
> > intentional?  If so, why?

> No, see above.  It seems like a bug in Texinfo version 6.x.

[ .... ]

> @itemx is used, since a plain @item puts (or used to put) an unwanted
> blank line between the items.  I think at the time I wrote it, the
> @table within an @itemize @asis list (as it originally was) was the only
> way I could get Texinto to format the info the way I wanted it.
> Somebody changed @itemize @asis to @itemize @w{} some while ago, but
> reversing that change doesn't fix the bug in Texinfo.

> I would like to keep compatibility with Texinfo 4.13 for those who don't
> like the perl versions of Texinfo.

> I think I will get in touch with the Texinfo people to see if they can
> help me get that list formatted properly.

> > I also attach three screenshots.  The first two show how the list is
> > currently rendered in HTML[1] and Info-mode, respectively.  The third
> > shows the Info-mode rendering following my suggested patch.

> Thanks.

> > [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/ccmode/Config-Basics.html

> > Thanks,

> > -- 
> > Basil

> > Emacs: GNU Emacs 26.1.92 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
> >  of 2019-02-26
> > Package: CC Mode 5.33.1 (C/*l)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.