GNU bug report logs - #34700
rm refuses to remove files owned by the user, even in force mode

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot <at> laposte.net>

Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:38:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: notabug

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot <at> laposte.net>, 34700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#34700: rm refuses to remove files owned by the user, even in force mode
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 07:58:38 -0600
On 3/1/19 6:48 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> For their own reasons, the Go maintainers have decided the user Go cache
> will now be read-only.
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27161#issuecomment-433098406
> 
> That means cleaning up cache artefacts with rm does not work anymore
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/30502
> 
> I understand the need to protect read only files (even though they're
> supposed to have been created by a user decision, not by user-hostile
> tools). However should not rm remove the files anyway in force (-f) mode
> without an explicit chmod first? Do it without bothering me is why -f
> exists after all.

The behavior of -f is specified by POSIX:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/rm.html

and is specified to suppress prompts and avoid diagnostics on missing
files, but NOT a means to force deletion via changing directory
permissions.  For that, you'd need a new option, because we can't change
the long-specified meaning of -f without breaking scripts.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 80 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.