Subject: bug#34678: 26.1; (elisp) `Minor Mode Conventions'

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:56:15 +0200

> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:22:40 -0800 (PST)
> From: Drew Adams <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> > I don't see why: cross-references don't have to be symmetrical.
> 
> Did someone say that cross-references have to be
> symmetrical?
> 
> > We refer to another node for details of something mentioned in passage,
> > but that other node doesn't have to provide a cross-reference back.
> 
> Did someone say that it had to?

You went a long way towards saying that, yes.  How else to interpret
your amplification of the original report?