GNU bug report logs - #3465
23.0.94; feature request: be able to log minibuffer messages

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:45:06 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: wontfix

Merged with 4477

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #80 received at 3465 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 3465 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, 4477 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bojohan <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#3465: 23.0.94; feature request: be able to log minibuffer
 messages
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 21:36:33 +0300
> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 3465 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bojohan <at> gnu.org,
>         4477 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> The request is to be able to have `minibuffer-message'
> output logged, WITHOUT calling `message'.

Why "without"?

> It's about simply controlling logging for
> `minibuffer-message', totally, completely, independent
> of any use of `message'.

You want every single call to minibuffer-message to be logged in
*Messages*?  I'm guessing not, because this would make no sense.

If you want to log only _some_ calls to minibuffer-message, then you
will have to have special code to request that in those places where
you want the minibuffer messages to be logged.  I'm saying that you
can easily call 'message' in those places, and be done with that.

> IOW, please forget about `message'.  The request is
> for a simple way to (optionally) log output of 
> `minibuffer-message', just as we do, for example for
> `message' output.  And without recourse to any call
> to `message' - no workaround, just a simple way to
> log `minibuffer-message'.  We have such a way for
> `message' output.  The request is for such a way for
> `minibuffer-message' output - totally independent
> from `message'.

You cannot request a feature and then also dictate how it is
implemented.  The solution I proposed should do what you want without
requiring any changes to the core.

> > You are already able to do that, AFAICT.
> 
> Not simply.

It's simple enough, from where I stand.  Certainly so for a minor
feature such as this one.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 268 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.