GNU bug report logs - #34645
Make TeX-process-check prompt optional?

Previous Next

Package: auctex;

Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>

Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:15:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Subject: bug#34645: closed (Re: bug#34645: Make TeX-process-check prompt
 optional?)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:41:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#34645: Make TeX-process-check prompt optional?

which was filed against the auctex package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 34645 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
34645: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34645
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Cc: 34645-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#34645: Make TeX-process-check prompt optional?
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:40:13 +0100
Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> writes:

> I think it does make sense to make it file-local, as one could be
> engaged in quite different workflows and want different behaviours.

Thanks.  I pushed that change now (406eb61fc1), so I'm closing this
report.

Best, Arash

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
To: bug-auctex <bug-auctex <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Make TeX-process-check prompt optional?
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:13:51 +0000
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
I find myself frequently being prompted by TeX-process-check while editing
a document that takes a long time to process. I always want to kill the
process and start a new one.

Would it be possible to add an option to disable the prompt, or is there
some reason why the prompt should always be offered?

I guess that in situations like mine an even better behaviour might be to
always let a run continue until it is done, but to queue up another run
when some change is outstanding. That way, one does not risk the output
document not updating for a long time if frequent edits are being made and
no LaTeX run ever completes, because it is always being interrupted.

Finally, I noticed one typo (version 12.1.2 of AUCTeX): the docstring of
TeX-process-check says "exist", and should say "exists".

For now, I just redefined TeX-process-check in my init sequence to omit the
prompt.

-- 
https://rrt.sc3d.org
[Message part 5 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 128 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.