GNU bug report logs -
#34645
Make TeX-process-check prompt optional?
Previous Next
Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:15:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:40:13 +0100
with message-id <m2y1amuwya.fsf <at> macmutant.fritz.box>
and subject line Re: bug#34645: Make TeX-process-check prompt optional?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34645,
regarding Make TeX-process-check prompt optional?
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
34645: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34645
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
I find myself frequently being prompted by TeX-process-check while editing
a document that takes a long time to process. I always want to kill the
process and start a new one.
Would it be possible to add an option to disable the prompt, or is there
some reason why the prompt should always be offered?
I guess that in situations like mine an even better behaviour might be to
always let a run continue until it is done, but to queue up another run
when some change is outstanding. That way, one does not risk the output
document not updating for a long time if frequent edits are being made and
no LaTeX run ever completes, because it is always being interrupted.
Finally, I noticed one typo (version 12.1.2 of AUCTeX): the docstring of
TeX-process-check says "exist", and should say "exists".
For now, I just redefined TeX-process-check in my init sequence to omit the
prompt.
--
https://rrt.sc3d.org
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> writes:
> I think it does make sense to make it file-local, as one could be
> engaged in quite different workflows and want different behaviours.
Thanks. I pushed that change now (406eb61fc1), so I'm closing this
report.
Best, Arash
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 127 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.