Subject: bug#34641: rx: (or ...) order unpredictable

From: Phil Sainty <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 22:00:27 +1300

On 3/03/19 9:54 PM, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> 3 mars 2019 kl. 00.48 skrev Phil Sainty <[email-masked]>:
>>>> +The optional argument NOREORDER, if nil, allows the returned
>> Could we change that name to have a positive sense?
> 
> You are right, and I wasn't happy with the negative name either.
> Would KEEP-ORDER do?

I think that's good, and no one has objected, so I think you could
go ahead with that change.

cheers,
-Phil