Subject: [bug#34634] [PATCH 1/1] gnu: tryton: Add tryton 5.0.6.

From: "Jovany Leandro G.C" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:58:42 -0500

El Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:15:39 +0100
Ludovic Courtès <[email-masked]> escribió:
> Hi Jovany,
> 
> Your email client mangled the patch.  In the future could you send
> patches as attachments or use ‘git send-email’?
ok sorry, i will be more alert with this
> 
> "Jovany Leandro G.C" <[email-masked]> skribis:
> 
> > From 693d00d1df68ada3bb43cbaecdd2823976e87bd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > 2001 From: "Jovany Leandro G.C" <[email-masked]>
> > Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 14:08:01 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: tryton: Add tryton 5.0.6.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/tryton.scm (tryton-5): New variable.  
> 
> Do you think we should keep both version 4 and version 5?  Is it
> generally useful today to have these two versions available?
> 
yeah it's very useful, tryton 4 and 5 both have updates, now 5 will be
LTS
> > +(define-public tryton-5
> > +  (package
> > +    (name "tryton")
> > +    (version "5.0.6")  
> 
> Should it inherit from ‘tryton’?
what it's the best path for this?
a guide please
> > +    (arguments
> > +     `(;;_XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid !=
> > 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not be created.
> > +       #:tests? #f  
> 
> Could you try adding a phase before ‘check’ that spawns Xvfb?  There
ok, i try before send the patch, and not work but will try again
> are several examples of this.
> 
> > +    (license license:gpl3)))  
> 
> Version 3 only, or version 3 “or any later version”?
> 
http://hg.tryton.org/tryton/file/5.0/LICENSE
yeah GPL-3+

> Could you send an updated patch?
> 
> Thank you,
> Ludo’.

yeah i will work on it.

thanks for you time and work