From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:56:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34607: url-retrieve-synchronously: TIMEOUT option value takes no effect Resent-From: Bad Blue Bull Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 17:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 34607 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 34607@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.155076835922790 (code B ref -1); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 17:00:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2019 16:59:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwrgt-0005vV-2y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:59:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41210) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwrgo-0005vG-W3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:59:17 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwrgj-0006ZR-Mo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:59:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwrgi-0007VW-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:59:09 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwrgh-0006X3-Dz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:59:08 -0500 Received: from forward400j.mail.yandex.net ([5.45.198.245]:37749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwrgg-0006SM-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:59:07 -0500 Received: from mxback20o.mail.yandex.net (mxback20o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::71]) by forward400j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id C21E06E0E35 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:58:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback20o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 1WL1byoeJS-ww1iqRgk; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:58:59 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1550768339; bh=Wy4ZzhyjPTwXeG3h6RPH1npCk0ep/9cWdqlhc3wDLzg=; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From; b=bDXjeKKv4TnB5oaQ5gcLoa+5Z4vXKfb4AY/TAaUHT8kerVNndbl4Im4Br/EEjScb7 Snj5eiygGZ9+qK06snzDSqGvOFzTUt+zVKgJFDukUl94w7LiZLr7gDTts9TjF7i1Mt 0BQuXo0uc/BsE3UCmRkM5jJ/ErRZ6dGO8JkYxnmg= Authentication-Results: mxback20o.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Received: by iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:58:58 +0300 From: Bad Blue Bull MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:58:58 +0300 Message-Id: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.45.198.245 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: try (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://foo.bar" nil 't 1) (kill-buffer)) Documentation says: (url-retrieve-synchronously URL &optional SILENT INHIBIT-COOKIES TIMEOUT) Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: foo.bar] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.92 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ibmbull[at]yandex.ru) 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.6 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: try (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://foo.bar" nil 't 1) (kill-buffer)) Documentation says: (url-retrieve-synchronously URL &optional SILENT INHIBIT-COOKIES TIMEOUT) Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: foo.bar] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.92 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ibmbull[at]yandex.ru) 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.6 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
try (with-current-buffer (url= -retrieve-synchronously "http://foo.bar" nil 't 1) (kill-buffer))
Documentation says:
(url-retrieve-synchronously URL &a= mp;optional SILENT INHIBIT-COOKIES TIMEOUT)
...
"If T= IMEOUT is passed, it should be a number that says (in seconds) how long t= o wait for a response before giving up."
Actually TIMEOUT is not working for me.
=C2=A0
******
GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version= 3.18.9)
From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:56:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34607: url-retrieve-synchronously: TIMEOUT option value takes no effect References: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> In-Reply-To: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> Resent-From: Bad Blue Bull Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34607 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 34607@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 34607-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34607.15507989425326 (code B ref 34607); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:30:04 +0000 Received: (at 34607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2019 01:29:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47480 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwze6-0001Nh-8h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 20:28:59 -0500 Received: from forward400j.mail.yandex.net ([5.45.198.245]:39578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwzdx-0001NF-I5 for 34607@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 20:28:53 -0500 Received: from mxback17g.mail.yandex.net (mxback17g.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:317]) by forward400j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D78176E0472 for <34607@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:28:41 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback17g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id UYxkGdhZD4-Sf3qlLfC; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:28:41 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1550798921; bh=2LNrjfxbBLJFPw315SIrFVwAOvcly1+OSMN5fOaySVU=; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From; b=GQBmMMUpM/+0BOBOhV3i2Seq5G+Qqe8OUjauhgQONT1kCRT+ZK2QTVUjbUWoowQXt uphJw9kUNM0boqtWdSNdg0E8tyb9ghnaB7rIgEaYNBaT/R9j7402dpC8sttYu1Xq3o POetUEu0KqaSWjykHvaPAJKNPU6ht20U8wPtm1AQ= Authentication-Results: mxback17g.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Received: by iva3-a2a8aac410a1.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:28:41 +0300 From: Bad Blue Bull MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:28:41 +0300 Message-Id: <5461661550798921@iva3-a2a8aac410a1.qloud-c.yandex.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
yet when TIMEOUT is set sync retrieval may return a buffer that is possessed by a process.
(with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://gnu.org" nil t 3)
may end with:
Buffer " *http gnu.org:80*" has a running process; kill it? (y or n)
and even after aswered "yes" number of buffers is incremented.
From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:56:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34607: (no subject) References: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> In-Reply-To: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> Resent-From: Bad Blue Bull Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 13:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34607 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 34607 <34607@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 34607-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34607.155084037112594 (code B ref 34607); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 13:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 34607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2019 12:59:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47645 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxAQM-0003H4-Ot for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:59:31 -0500 Received: from forward100j.mail.yandex.net ([5.45.198.240]:55100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxAQJ-0003Gn-G2 for 34607@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 07:59:29 -0500 Received: from mxback9j.mail.yandex.net (mxback9j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::112]) by forward100j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3BF8950E1E48 for <34607@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:59:19 +0300 (MSK) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by mxback9j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id nkYnR8W3qD-xIp0E1ZB; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:59:18 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1550840358; bh=8eS6rJHFWUp/MC5L5ehVTfA0gvxRPHCbtTvfXDBYy70=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From; b=o0K6fMeFXEKH6R8johVothbg6OV1IATD8S08Tb/3jF32EAsgRTZjVWTVRw354K/TK TGrsa3/Y+aT/iCplTggugJM09Yy6zDXAKs8QZU0UQEANFykduGDYpTfBmsvhPDKxjA sClACNIFpiUJ58xIKNdrMIA2XFuyLqacIwRkGF0k= Authentication-Results: mxback9j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Received: by sas1-adb97d30497b.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:59:18 +0300 From: Bad Blue Bull MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:59:18 +0300 Message-Id: <8701561550840358@sas1-adb97d30497b.qloud-c.yandex.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: sorry, elisp line intented intended to be (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://gnu.org" nil t 3) (kill-buffer)) Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: yandex.ru] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [5.45.198.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ibmbull[at]yandex.ru) 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.6 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: sorry, elisp line intented intended to be (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://gnu.org" nil t 3) (kill-buffer)) Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: yandex.ru] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [5.45.198.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ibmbull[at]yandex.ru) 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.6 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject
sorry, elisp line intented intended to be
(with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://gnu.org" nil t 3) (kill-buffer))
From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 15 00:06:11 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2019 04:06:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50632 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQlBD-0001OG-CO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 00:06:11 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:36365) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQlBB-0001O6-75 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 00:06:10 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQlB7-0004fV-Ay for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:06:07 +0200 Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 06:06:00 +0200 Message-Id: <87v9ycxsyf.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #34607 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 34607 confirmed From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:56:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34607: (no subject) Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 04:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34607 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed To: Bad Blue Bull Cc: 34607 <34607@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 34607-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34607.15578933395671 (code B ref 34607); Wed, 15 May 2019 04:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 34607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2019 04:08:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50661 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQlDt-0001TM-7H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 00:08:59 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:36388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQlDr-0001TD-4q for 34607@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 00:08:55 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQlDo-0004DN-BE; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:08:54 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> <8701561550840358@sas1-adb97d30497b.qloud-c.yandex.net> Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 06:08:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8701561550840358@sas1-adb97d30497b.qloud-c.yandex.net> (Bad Blue Bull's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:59:18 +0300") Message-ID: <87r290xsts.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Bad Blue Bull writes: > sorry, elisp line intented intended to be > (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://gnu.org" nil t 3) (kill-buffer)) This is surprisingly difficult to fix -- the reason being that URL library is asynchronously following a redirect, and possibly opening a new connection, and then marking that new connection with `pro [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gnu.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.224.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Bad Blue Bull writes: > sorry, elisp line intented intended to be > (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://gnu.org" nil t 3) (kill-buffer)) This is surprisingly difficult to fix -- the reason being that URL library is asynchronously following a redirect, and possibly opening a new connection, and then marking that new connection with `process-query-on-exit-flag'. So depending on where you are in that cycle, the buffer may have a query-enabled process when you try to kill it. Which sucks. On timeouts, url-retrive-synchronously should abort the entire thing, but url-retrieve (which is used in the background) doesn't really support that... Hm. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:56:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34607: (no subject) Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 13:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34607 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Bad Blue Bull Cc: 34607 <34607@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 34607-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34607.15579268871629 (code B ref 34607); Wed, 15 May 2019 13:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 34607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2019 13:28:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQtx0-0000QC-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:28:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:38920) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQtwy-0000Pq-Rh for 34607@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:28:05 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id w8so2687881wrl.6 for <34607@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c9z89X6GYg13+lrn+gKWRFiGABNc7i/ffymnaMjk03A=; b=Euk2zFHWbqPcH7cTYNGiN4g7RZOzzhyuUFgtqdYyKg/2A4ijYw7Cte6yrnK8wROcx5 xZhjZF/karR38mmmbpi8KWeTr8xfMA4cGxnDW1hQv7pqwHQm5NgPTmGuq/SX8iEe6scS nTPQJfHlIauz2zWxH42vWSXMW0NvopSnjklnlhXzlxe63Kt5YiiEM0SJ3o8210MDPm+x /9+sbsudrDoUtGougfsoi3u37OSF+HDn4fKzsOBIZGJI9nupNaLpFMiDAcXKxL4lje7t X9FsU071Cz8LMpEbL1BomdcG3Ybmq56S5Ba7E2oyD7CAS9TwNmeQda+y063uIR7+Mqmh 1xyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=c9z89X6GYg13+lrn+gKWRFiGABNc7i/ffymnaMjk03A=; b=QwtDBcgyAoj/XA5irRC08+M5sK7BTt2vVGVCU7TNBaurl3r5o4+4vK2ECYel/5FnAF 0p252LzzUsIEXxbkNIRBUDJAFQ9Y4OHMV3IPEYVr90MFV5aWBiYoKABT/L4D+578JfCD Y1Yene6j/Z4jp4UvEQUDS/Yy61v0qdFNZduw17N4tIp/ZrJsaVdkSURaINU61g+ATwn+ yHSaiP+9+1hODeCsiTdpeSLjv82ICxPGeKaUPE823jnMqe3lUJEqwtt7Nt9VUynAM9LC Aoq9+Ol0V7fg48WSJW9F/0dDAbaCZEGK9X4sDwPWw4YEfdVEaAmRrSEY10d6CBvN7PW7 Ix8g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/3/81GU41Dr+FZGnmiNdfH3WsKBtH4Or8WZVnFsEPeT1NDsMr 06ZLiVejflDVfVbTR99qVoLo+pwA X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy4Sy9dBwP7zzapuqie5jt/DEdlKMcSu4jxjo2mxYSKt90uSHPaIU6j9NFWo/TJKnMtHmp4WQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:db87:: with SMTP id u7mr14167304wri.245.1557926878222; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm2414647wro.85.2019.05.15.06.27.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 May 2019 06:27:56 -0700 (PDT) References: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> <8701561550840358@sas1-adb97d30497b.qloud-c.yandex.net> <87r290xsts.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <2d37de5a-5040-0ec5-b9c7-1fd11ad593a7@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:27:55 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87r290xsts.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 15.05.2019 7:08, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > On timeouts, url-retrive-synchronously should abort the entire thing, > but url-retrieve (which is used in the background) doesn't really > support that. [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (raaahh[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) On 15.05.2019 7:08, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > On timeouts, url-retrive-synchronously should abort the entire thing, > but url-retrieve (which is used in the background) doesn't really > support that... I think that's one of the reasons behind url-retrieve-synchronously's two delete-process calls. They don't exactly seem to work as intended, though. From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:56:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34607: (no subject) Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 20:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34607 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed To: Dmitry Gutov Cc: 34607 <34607@debbugs.gnu.org>, Bad Blue Bull Received: via spool by 34607-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34607.159519137027058 (code B ref 34607); Sun, 19 Jul 2020 20:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 34607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2020 20:42:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33142 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxG93-00072M-OD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 16:42:49 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37288) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxG91-000725-Ib for 34607@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 16:42:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4S4V0hZBhn4uY8IEvjM8nKF/nouLZgDf7VwHA0dmDWg=; b=UmHHvR8NuLZSV5niWuGSNrFJnm IOsxKux0sd0nOapDJbVzjtKYwQoWhZHKnWnvqol20vmb4KMCRJNcwvbPtnmeocuAX6lckOLfnxiW6 twEDWiHBAZxg7hanVZ8O6LRCOezCPZdWgXZoXAsAsh15wtl8TMzz5BKFa95NdPa97p3E=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jxG8q-0004ny-HK; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 22:42:41 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> <8701561550840358@sas1-adb97d30497b.qloud-c.yandex.net> <87r290xsts.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <2d37de5a-5040-0ec5-b9c7-1fd11ad593a7@yandex.ru> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 22:42:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2d37de5a-5040-0ec5-b9c7-1fd11ad593a7@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 15 May 2019 16:27:55 +0300") Message-ID: <87tuy3jkxx.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 15.05.2019 7:08, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> On timeouts, url-retrive-synchronously should abort the entire thing, >> but url-retrieve (which is used in the background) doesn't really >> support [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 15.05.2019 7:08, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> On timeouts, url-retrive-synchronously should abort the entire thing, >> but url-retrieve (which is used in the background) doesn't really >> support [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 15.05.2019 7:08, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> On timeouts, url-retrive-synchronously should abort the entire thing, >> but url-retrieve (which is used in the background) doesn't really >> support that... > > I think that's one of the reasons behind url-retrieve-synchronously's > two delete-process calls. They don't exactly seem to work as intended, > though. Yeah, they don't trigger on timeouts, apparently. I've now added some more process deletions, which fixes this use case: (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://gnu.org" nil t 0.1) (kill-buffer)) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 19 16:42:57 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2020 20:42:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33145 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxG9A-00072i-VW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 16:42:57 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37302) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxG98-00072L-Q8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 16:42:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vedItwBDLt4MVaAFXFxiJiu9opuZVABGEtB7qXkjKIk=; b=lT4rDq0b3ShHAaHPVJjfRSLC2E cdBdcJzbtY396kD/qqRbJ4iHJg4FgZtzTQR6iYQ7IlfVMLTV/t7/jviG26eQmWpbJMCdPc/kmv5N4 X33Zv/a8MEEiCqworc1z5NllNF09j9+qyf84r1HJeQ8qFi6yvs2XtN5VMuFf0pXNhbxc=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jxG90-0004o7-Vh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 22:42:49 +0200 Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 22:42:45 +0200 Message-Id: <87sgdnjkxm.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #34607 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 34607 fixed close 34607 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 34607 fixed close 34607 28.1 quit From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:56:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34607: (no subject) Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 21:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34607 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed confirmed To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 34607 <34607@debbugs.gnu.org>, Bad Blue Bull Received: via spool by 34607-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34607.15951927125057 (code B ref 34607); Sun, 19 Jul 2020 21:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 34607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2020 21:05:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33163 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxGUi-0001JV-9g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 17:05:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com ([209.85.208.54]:38725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxGUf-0001JA-Hx for 34607@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 17:05:10 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id n2so11400073edr.5 for <34607@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 14:05:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tBySsD64VAq+me05CJKSjHfSVjFBa/09X8aWKJ4uqa0=; b=OJAqpayS3sgwmXtlHgLZ72YN8Mfq5QVq+4tswrhetQes6fwAcNdjdWOQNjVkWn9vJi pTD+rcRNyf9ZtZvKs5t912Sm0cchNEOPTmMq5WTSFNrwqlOwRQZ9uQVmpQAvVWPWWmO2 b7m+Xo+qenHyGtmFssEBGSS8W+Zrj7A2hvWk+lg0KoeNi0/jWbqxCtRcVsT/St/Lv/SB GyclhQWPjsRfueaaStkkUdh93nzuOkRXVXlK8mgT0jK4/Q7dPK2NNrunDE7JYjGx+Hf3 Lzets1AWpvCqd6X+kffvzcOm2788SbcDykhIqqHZHf0BZSaml/H5pT+RXaGNRgv9iEPp vAQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tBySsD64VAq+me05CJKSjHfSVjFBa/09X8aWKJ4uqa0=; b=n5rtuc6fx733uGKQCPLkLcxA6MliYwpMkA5oxfJRh8oRikk012mvepWSNsYLcpondk r61/rRfaGSL7+1vPo3811BIKFisfiknbIZrDsxv/eFLBPtbxSBfzUzRmbgDPkqk2Gqs5 UtBNzXwAk4u7JpkSYiV1zqGsW1PeYRTh7XlbjWSPhc5j+rt1K5nRjN/aOa6cSodWcQC0 VP/anzsxhJ6LbAdLxdCQ4Cjq4YB5kce8xmOl1nS6+gyS2Oz0uvH4WWRUlqyM+Kfqkq1p SiRjMGT2Echo8oDrXYEXTezs8tWgok+Tj1WClSNz0vYG/i0GDT/kl6A9Cth84bhZk5KL sspA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+PT5k3hVh+bDB5KIEXu+pbJ/cDE9mq7muYrP2RFWT77Cdp4Ee 2MptWy6+8fXPS1tXwAzuiMs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxz0+tJoxfuNSn6VU1msOEbNbnN3DvqHDXpUbLV3cGcjClB2ARCfFdf1SVaYM6E2oIRZA0tSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1507:: with SMTP id f7mr19519877edw.37.1595192703684; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 14:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm13370974ejx.3.2020.07.19.14.05.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Jul 2020 14:05:02 -0700 (PDT) References: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> <8701561550840358@sas1-adb97d30497b.qloud-c.yandex.net> <87r290xsts.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <2d37de5a-5040-0ec5-b9c7-1fd11ad593a7@yandex.ru> <87tuy3jkxx.fsf@gnus.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <04082c85-52a2-90e5-9f92-19192311f45b@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 00:05:01 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tuy3jkxx.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 19.07.2020 23:42, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Yeah, they don't trigger on timeouts, apparently. Thanks! > I've now added some more process deletions, which fixes this use case: > > (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously"http://gnu.org" nil t 0.1) > (kill-buffer)) Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (raaahh[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.54 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) On 19.07.2020 23:42, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Yeah, they don't trigger on timeouts, apparently. Thanks! > I've now added some more process deletions, which fixes this use case: > > (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously"http://gnu.org" nil t 0.1) > (kill-buffer)) That's a neat little way to reproduce the problem. Might be worth it to add a test like this. From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:56:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#34607: (no subject) Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 21:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34607 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed confirmed To: Dmitry Gutov Cc: 34607 <34607@debbugs.gnu.org>, Bad Blue Bull Received: via spool by 34607-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34607.15951939836947 (code B ref 34607); Sun, 19 Jul 2020 21:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 34607) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2020 21:26:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxGpD-0001nx-1u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 17:26:23 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxGp8-0001ni-10 for 34607@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 17:26:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cgfWc4u8b3JzBs5eOsco2GBbyX4KbDjKARC03FurNio=; b=jH985En4k2hs5LmJYRBhzLk8uS 11gI50IhaCE7PUSox1iqrjXbt8TTX7MazDOBDiV4JS7CAxIVyswPylVRSh1/g5lXevIMVyaeqyqUC sj2kEkRQl7Tr+a2VGZNc6sy9Og7oNi5hIycieKJyuDr2TyZcGn7uisWziePkzU0qkrLM=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jxGos-0005AG-3o; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 23:26:11 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <4482471550768338@iva6-fcf606ab9514.qloud-c.yandex.net> <8701561550840358@sas1-adb97d30497b.qloud-c.yandex.net> <87r290xsts.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <2d37de5a-5040-0ec5-b9c7-1fd11ad593a7@yandex.ru> <87tuy3jkxx.fsf@gnus.org> <04082c85-52a2-90e5-9f92-19192311f45b@yandex.ru> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 23:26:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <04082c85-52a2-90e5-9f92-19192311f45b@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 20 Jul 2020 00:05:01 +0300") Message-ID: <87o8objixj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dmitry Gutov writes: >> I've now added some more process deletions, which fixes this use case: >> (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously"http://gnu.org" >> nil t 0.1) >> (kill-buffer)) > > That's a neat little w [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dmitry Gutov writes: >> I've now added some more process deletions, which fixes this use case: >> (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously"http://gnu.org" >> nil t 0.1) >> (kill-buffer)) > > That's a neat little w [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Dmitry Gutov writes: >> I've now added some more process deletions, which fixes this use case: >> (with-current-buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously"http://gnu.org" >> nil t 0.1) >> (kill-buffer)) > > That's a neat little way to reproduce the problem. Might be worth it > to add a test like this. For a non-automatic test? I don't think we want to hit that web site during the normal tests. :-) But it's brittle in any case -- it's a good test site now because it uses a redirect, but that may not be the case in the future, so I don't know how useful it is as a test in the long term... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no