From unknown Sun Aug 17 09:10:33 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#34590 <34590@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#34590 <34590@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Effects of GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH and --load-path differ Reply-To: bug#34590 <34590@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 16:10:33 +0000 retitle 34590 Effects of GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH and --load-path differ reassign 34590 guix submitter 34590 Daniel Gerber severity 34590 normal tag 34590 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 20 05:37:50 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2019 10:37:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57207 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwPGA-0001av-Bj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:37:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33496) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwPG7-0001ag-DD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:37:48 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwPFx-0005VF-I7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:37:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwPFw-0005mY-PV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:37:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwPFu-0005TI-TN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:37:36 -0500 Received: from smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch ([128.65.195.6]:47714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwPFs-0005Oh-UD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:37:34 -0500 Received: from smtp8.infomaniak.ch (smtp8.infomaniak.ch [83.166.132.38]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x1KAbSZY007219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:37:28 +0100 Received: from jura (84-73-10-131.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.10.131]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp8.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x1KAbQRp019902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:37:28 +0100 From: Daniel Gerber To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Effects of GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH and --load-path differ Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:38:19 +0100 Message-ID: <8736oivj6s.fsf@atufi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8 X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 128.65.195.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Hi, >From reading the doc on `guix environment`: -L, --load-path=DIR prepend DIR to the package module search path I would expect these to be exactly equivalent: $ export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=; guix environment -L path ... $ export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=path; guix environment ... Yet they differ. With libuv@1.24.0 in the guix channel (a37bdf4) and libuv@1.26.0 in --and also node@11.10.0 only in-- /gnu/guix-local-packages/: $ export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=/gnu/guix-local-packages/; guix environment --no-grafts -C node@11.10.0 --ad-hoc strace gdb -- ls /gnu/store/ |grep -o libuv-.* libuv-1.26.0 $ export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=; guix environment -L /gnu/guix-local-packages/ --no-grafts -C node@11.10.0 --ad-hoc strace gdb -- ls /gnu/store/ |grep -o libuv-.* libuv-1.24.0 Is this the intended behaviour? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 06 08:38:16 2019 Received: (at 34590) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2019 13:38:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33834 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1WkS-00058R-Im for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 08:38:16 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:58628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1WkQ-00058H-H7 for 34590@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 08:38:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9B0A9E1; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:38:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OVu4LjZJ6ytj; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:38:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2446A74C; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:38:11 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Daniel Gerber Subject: Re: bug#34590: Effects of GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH and --load-path differ References: <8736oivj6s.fsf@atufi.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:38:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8736oivj6s.fsf@atufi.org> (Daniel Gerber's message of "Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:38:19 +0100") Message-ID: <87lg1si0n0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34590 Cc: 34590@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi Daniel, Daniel Gerber skribis: > From reading the doc on `guix environment`: > > -L, --load-path=3DDIR prepend DIR to the package module search path > > I would expect these to be exactly equivalent: > > $ export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3D; guix environment -L path ... > $ export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3Dpath; guix environment ... > > Yet they differ. With libuv@1.24.0 in the guix channel (a37bdf4) and libu= v@1.26.0 in --and also node@11.10.0 only in--=20 > /gnu/guix-local-packages/: > > $ export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3D/gnu/guix-local-packages/; guix environment > --no-grafts -C node@11.10.0 --ad-hoc strace gdb -- ls /gnu/store/ > |grep -o libuv-.* > libuv-1.26.0 > > $ export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3D; guix environment -L=20 > /gnu/guix-local-packages/ --no-grafts -C node@11.10.0 --ad-hoc strace > gdb -- ls /gnu/store/ |grep -o libuv-.* > libuv-1.24.0 > > Is this the intended behaviour? Probably not. I experimented a bit and couldn=E2=80=99t find any evidence that the search= path order would differ. However, what do /gnu/guix-local-packages/ contain? I suppose it provides node@11.10.0? Then my guess is that =E2=80=9Cnode@11.10.0=E2=80=9D is ambiguous and that =E2=80=98specification->package=E2=80=99 chooses one of the two in a non-de= terministic fashion. Can you show the output of: guix package -A node guix package -A node -L /gnu/guix-local-packages GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3D/gnu/guix-local-packages guix package -A node ? TIA, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 06 09:42:52 2019 Received: (at 34590) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2019 14:42:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Xky-0006e8-89 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 09:42:52 -0500 Received: from smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch ([128.65.195.4]:59837) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Xkv-0006dv-0W for 34590@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 09:42:50 -0500 Received: from smtp6.infomaniak.ch (smtp6.infomaniak.ch [83.166.132.19]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x26Egkeb032423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:42:46 +0100 Received: from jura (84-73-10-131.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.10.131]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp6.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x26EgjXh005447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:42:46 +0100 References: <8736oivj6s.fsf@atufi.org> <87lg1si0n0.fsf@gnu.org> From: Daniel Gerber To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#34590: Effects of GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH and --load-path differ In-reply-to: <87lg1si0n0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:43:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87h8cg3vxe.fsf@atufi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8 X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34590 Cc: 34590@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, 2019-03-06, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:=20 > However, what do /gnu/guix-local-packages/ contain? I suppose=20 > it provides node@11.10.0?=20 Yes, it provides node@11.10.0 *plus* its dependency libuv@1.26.0.=20 $ tree /gnu/guix-local-packages/ /gnu/guix-local-packages/ =E2=94=9C=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=20 gnu =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 packages =E2=94=82= =C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 libevent.scm =E2=94=82=C2=A0= =C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=20 node.scm =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 node-llhttp.patch=20 =20 > Then my guess is that =E2=80=9Cnode@11.10.0=E2=80=9D is ambiguous and tha= t=20 > =E2=80=98specification->package=E2=80=99 chooses one of the two in a=20 > non-deterministic fashion.=20 >=20 > Can you show the output of:=20 >=20 > guix package -A node guix package -A node -L=20 > /gnu/guix-local-packages=20 > GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3D/gnu/guix-local-packages guix package -A=20 > node=20 $ guix package -A '^(node|libuv)' libuv 1.24.0 out=20 gnu/packages/libevent.scm:125:2 libuv 1.19.2 out=20 gnu/packages/libevent.scm:159:2 node 9.11.1 out=20 gnu/packages/node.scm:46:2 node-lts 8.12.0 out=20 gnu/packages/node.scm:202:2=20 =20 $ guix package -A '^(node|libuv)' -L /gnu/guix-local-packages=20 ;;; note: source file=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/libevent.scm ;;;=20 newer than compiled=20 /gnu/store/l6wkk4kzhvkg014slv3plx513cgxqx6h-guix-module-union/lib/guile/2= .2/site-ccache/gnu/packages/libevent.go=20 ;;; note: source file=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/node.scm ;;; newer=20 than compiled=20 /gnu/store/l6wkk4kzhvkg014slv3plx513cgxqx6h-guix-module-union/lib/guile/2= .2/site-ccache/gnu/packages/node.go=20 libuv 1.19.2 out=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/libevent.scm:159:2 libuv=20 1.26.0 out=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/libevent.scm:125:2 node=20 11.10.0 out=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/node.scm:46:2 node-lts=20 8.12.0 out=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/node.scm:185:2=20 =20 $ GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3D/gnu/guix-local-packages guix package -A=20 '^(node|libuv)' ;;; note: source file=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/libevent.scm ;;;=20 newer than compiled=20 /gnu/store/l6wkk4kzhvkg014slv3plx513cgxqx6h-guix-module-union/lib/guile/2= .2/site-ccache/gnu/packages/libevent.go=20 ;;; note: source file=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/node.scm ;;; newer=20 than compiled=20 /gnu/store/l6wkk4kzhvkg014slv3plx513cgxqx6h-guix-module-union/lib/guile/2= .2/site-ccache/gnu/packages/node.go=20 libuv 1.26.0 out=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/libevent.scm:125:2 libuv=20 1.19.2 out=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/libevent.scm:159:2 node=20 11.10.0 out=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/node.scm:46:2 node-lts=20 8.12.0 out=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages/gnu/packages/node.scm:185:2=20 =20 I note the order of libuv packages varies, but versions are=20 correct. Also, should one worry about the "source newer than=20 compiled" messages? I presumed the cached .go files come from the=20 official channel, hence older than the sources in=20 /gnu/guix-local-packages. -- Daniel Gerber -- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 06 12:49:15 2019 Received: (at 34590) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2019 17:49:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34644 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1afK-0006xv-Pf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 12:49:14 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:34638) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1afI-0006xo-W2 for 34590@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 12:49:14 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D221AB94; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 18:49:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N1OWBnXyFxTN; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 18:49:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CA35AB8A; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 18:49:10 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Daniel Gerber Subject: Re: bug#34590: Effects of GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH and --load-path differ References: <8736oivj6s.fsf@atufi.org> <87lg1si0n0.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8cg3vxe.fsf@atufi.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 18:49:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h8cg3vxe.fsf@atufi.org> (Daniel Gerber's message of "Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:43:41 +0100") Message-ID: <8736nzgaga.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34590 Cc: 34590@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi, Daniel Gerber skribis: >> However, what do /gnu/guix-local-packages/ contain? I suppose it >> provides node@11.10.0?=20 > > Yes, it provides node@11.10.0 *plus* its dependency libuv@1.26.0.=20 > > $ tree /gnu/guix-local-packages/ /gnu/guix-local-packages/ =E2=94=9C=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80 gnu > =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 packages =E2=94=82=C2= =A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 libevent.scm =E2=94=82=C2=A0=C2= =A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 node.scm =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 > node-llhttp.patch=20 (Looks like your email client automatically splits lines, but I think I got the above tree right.) Your local packages use the same module names as those in Guix itself: (gnu packages =E2=80=A6). You should not do that because modules are unique. That is, there can be only one (gnu packages node) module at run time. It may be that GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH and -L lead to a different (gnu packages node) being loaded first, but really the core of the problem IMO is the module name collision. So my suggestion would be to rename your modules to, say, (daniel packages =E2=80=A6); remember to =E2=80=9Cmv gnu daniel=E2=80=9D as well. Let me know if that solves the problem! Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 07 03:01:05 2019 Received: (at 34590) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2019 08:01:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34884 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1nxh-00059Y-5j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 03:01:05 -0500 Received: from smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch ([128.65.195.6]:34947) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1nxd-000590-Pq for 34590@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 03:01:03 -0500 Received: from smtp5.infomaniak.ch (smtp5.infomaniak.ch [83.166.132.18]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2780xZ4021520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:00:59 +0100 Received: from jura (84-73-10-131.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.73.10.131]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp5.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2780wPP057062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:00:59 +0100 References: <8736oivj6s.fsf@atufi.org> <87lg1si0n0.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8cg3vxe.fsf@atufi.org> <8736nzgaga.fsf@gnu.org> From: Daniel Gerber To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#34590: Effects of GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH and --load-path differ In-reply-to: <8736nzgaga.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:01:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87pnr3ru30.fsf@atufi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8 X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34590 Cc: 34590@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) I see, then I'll need another workflow to hack on gnu packages -- either rename them or maintain a local branch/channel for guix and build with ./pre-inst-env. That should solve it, thanks! -- Daniel Gerber -- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 08 06:36:35 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2019 11:36:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35908 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Dnn-00009W-7j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:36:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Dnm-00009J-12 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:36:34 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Dnf-000242-R0 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:36:27 -0500 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=41156 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Dnc-0001zZ-Ge for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:36:24 -0500 Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 12:36:21 +0100 Message-Id: <87ftrxha2y.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #34590 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 34590 notabug close 34590 From unknown Sun Aug 17 09:10:33 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator