GNU bug report logs -
#34573
Backtrace of guix pull failed
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Bonjour Vincent,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:55:58AM +0100, Vincent Rouvreau wrote:
> And guix pull failed :
>
> guix package -i python python-numpy python-conda
> eval `guix package --search-paths=prefix`
so the first two commands succeeded?
> guix pull
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2887:24 19 (_)
> 222:29 18 (map1 (((guix i18n)) ((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((?)) ?))
> 222:29 17 (map1 (((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) (#) ?))
> 222:29 16 (map1 (((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) ((guix store)) (#) ?))
> 222:29 15 (map1 (((guix utils)) ((guix store)) ((guix config)) # ?))
> 222:29 14 (map1 (((guix store)) ((guix config)) ((guix #)) ((?)) ?))
> 222:29 13 (map1 (((guix config)) ((guix packages)) ((guix #)) # ?))
> 222:29 12 (map1 (((guix packages)) ((guix profiles)) ((guix #)) ?))
> 222:17 11 (map1 (((guix profiles)) ((guix derivations)) ((# #)) ?))
> 2800:17 10 (resolve-interface (guix profiles) #:select _ #:hide _ # ?)
> In ice-9/threads.scm:
> 390:8 9 (_ _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2726:13 8 (_)
Could you post the lines preceding this error message? I just experienced
a similar case, and the real error happened before (a package needed to be
compiled first and failed).
Could you please send the output of
guix --version
and
guix describe
?
Thanks,
Andreas
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 139 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.