From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:39:05 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#34573 <34573@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#34573 <34573@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Backtrace of guix pull failed Reply-To: bug#34573 <34573@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 15:39:05 +0000 retitle 34573 Backtrace of guix pull failed reassign 34573 guix submitter 34573 Vincent Rouvreau severity 34573 normal tag 34573 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 10:28:26 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 15:28:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw7Jp-0000Ng-AC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:28:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56105) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw28O-0006g1-Gw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:56:16 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw28H-0004vN-JX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:56:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw28G-0000ov-Gi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:56:09 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw28E-0004sx-GB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:56:08 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:29788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw28C-0004mW-Nu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:56:06 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,387,1544482800"; d="scan'208";a="369983552" Received: from zcs-store5.inria.fr ([128.93.142.32]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2019 10:55:58 +0100 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:55:58 +0100 (CET) From: Vincent Rouvreau To: bug-guix@gnu.org Message-ID: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> Subject: Backtrace of guix pull failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [193.55.177.134] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.7.11_GA_3706 (ZimbraWebClient - FF65 (Linux)/8.7.11_GA_3706) Thread-Index: Gmp5DzNP7gYTa5CAjp929bDGvFaGfg== Thread-Topic: Backtrace of guix pull failed X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.134.164.83 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:28:23 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, I wanted to install python, numpy and conda on plafrim as explained here : = https://www.plafrim.fr/en/guix/ And guix pull failed : guix package -i python python-numpy python-conda eval `guix package --search-paths=3Dprefix` guix pull Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 2887:24 19 (_) 222:29 18 (map1 (((guix i18n)) ((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((?)) ?)) 222:29 17 (map1 (((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) (#) ?)) 222:29 16 (map1 (((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) ((guix store)) (#) ?)) 222:29 15 (map1 (((guix utils)) ((guix store)) ((guix config)) # ?)) 222:29 14 (map1 (((guix store)) ((guix config)) ((guix #)) ((?)) ?)) 222:29 13 (map1 (((guix config)) ((guix packages)) ((guix #)) # ?)) 222:29 12 (map1 (((guix packages)) ((guix profiles)) ((guix #)) ?)) 222:17 11 (map1 (((guix profiles)) ((guix derivations)) ((# #)) ?)) 2800:17 10 (resolve-interface (guix profiles) #:select _ #:hide _ # ?) In ice-9/threads.scm: 390:8 9 (_ _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 2726:13 8 (_) In ice-9/threads.scm: 390:8 7 (_ _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 2994:20 6 (_) 2312:4 5 (save-module-excursion #) 3014:26 4 (_) In unknown file: 3 (primitive-load-path "guix/profiles" #) In ./guix/profiles.scm: 1773:23 2 (_) In ./guix/utils.scm: 661:47 1 (xdg-directory _ "/.config" #:ensure? _) In unknown file: 0 (getpw 10837) ERROR: In procedure getpw: In procedure getpw: entry not found guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/i49yy9zlv7h1bsds= 96ld7fhgni9ycvr6-compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "be92b4b000dbe84a525de7= 857296fede318048d9"; system: "x86_64-linux"; host version: "a9ba0a3154f3f20097000407a96a390ad3dee100"; pull-version: 1). Please report it by email to . I want to precise it is my first time with guix and I may misunderstood som= e points... Regards, Vincent Rouvreau - Service Exp=E9rimentation et D=E9veloppement INRIA Saclay Tel: (+33).1.74.85.42.32 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 10:42:07 2019 Received: (at 34573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 15:42:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw7X5-0002j3-3X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:42:07 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:48810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw7X3-0002iv-SZ for 34573@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:42:06 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E44827F2; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:42:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZTIvWkzSrd8y; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:42:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:660:6102:310:95e8:7a4a:6603:70ca]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97F7B2779; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:42:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:42:02 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: Vincent Rouvreau Subject: Re: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed Message-ID: <20190219154202.GA5022@jurong> References: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34573 Cc: 34573@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Bonjour Vincent, On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:55:58AM +0100, Vincent Rouvreau wrote: > And guix pull failed : > > guix package -i python python-numpy python-conda > eval `guix package --search-paths=prefix` so the first two commands succeeded? > guix pull > Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 2887:24 19 (_) > 222:29 18 (map1 (((guix i18n)) ((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((?)) ?)) > 222:29 17 (map1 (((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) (#) ?)) > 222:29 16 (map1 (((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) ((guix store)) (#) ?)) > 222:29 15 (map1 (((guix utils)) ((guix store)) ((guix config)) # ?)) > 222:29 14 (map1 (((guix store)) ((guix config)) ((guix #)) ((?)) ?)) > 222:29 13 (map1 (((guix config)) ((guix packages)) ((guix #)) # ?)) > 222:29 12 (map1 (((guix packages)) ((guix profiles)) ((guix #)) ?)) > 222:17 11 (map1 (((guix profiles)) ((guix derivations)) ((# #)) ?)) > 2800:17 10 (resolve-interface (guix profiles) #:select _ #:hide _ # ?) > In ice-9/threads.scm: > 390:8 9 (_ _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 2726:13 8 (_) Could you post the lines preceding this error message? I just experienced a similar case, and the real error happened before (a package needed to be compiled first and failed). Could you please send the output of guix --version and guix describe ? Thanks, Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 11:09:14 2019 Received: (at 34573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 16:09:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw7xJ-0003NW-TW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:09:14 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw7xH-0003NN-Ck for 34573@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:09:12 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1550592542; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=Lm/2fCDQ18C9imH0aQfG8EsLYf+fQ3XxHh34tvBEHLE37vHMNV6sFzWPwSLncL4XX6jBVI7bQPrOg/+TY3v/UwEx4Dj7RPyk/Nt+MUWO7Fs86MkZgb9hnRpLvpKsOQk9t4OOMAA0jxm/6onnE6vlDUBccXwD/2Roe291j/7nWDE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1550592542; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=88iigSzKVhyuhwLDOx+7GuTw7yKn2MhO1O/N+ijC+K8=; b=KTFRnGUL6NzkyeIt6+asByyaCyt0V0PV8D28CZ+KZa2KzW8jaK8bvL+sE4QCWDbpBY+ZGTQUgcX5g6nJCba5Znn3fhw66UdWcKXOOffCl+2AGk44rhdP5YtMZFI8iNbJI7zVYzTz0FJmMrloJp4o9A55qkpTnSNYtu9+muaPwbU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1550592542; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-reply-to:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=1002; bh=88iigSzKVhyuhwLDOx+7GuTw7yKn2MhO1O/N+ijC+K8=; b=eJqayT75OisRk7xqv2CH5Ymtc5fu7dfiYNWlf94waZALSmj4kJskrhuKMZnXHzcD 2kyOqhLRypbijaAOztnEdPwHQFUtxVa5svrYyae9VUcEX6xVzraSRIWwIWbBH4Y2Z0P J1sjCSlk0xTXGwZWkHditZ5Yo1w0iegepGX2xMu0= Received: from localhost (141.80.247.231 [141.80.247.231]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1550592540249192.20255881146238; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:09:00 -0800 (PST) References: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Vincent Rouvreau Subject: Re: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed Message-ID: <87ftsjvk1i.fsf@elephly.net> In-reply-to: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:08:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34573 Cc: 34573@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Vincent, > I wanted to install python, numpy and conda on plafrim as explained here = : https://www.plafrim.fr/en/guix/ > And guix pull failed : [=E2=80=A6] > In ./guix/profiles.scm: > 1773:23 2 (_) > In ./guix/utils.scm: > 661:47 1 (xdg-directory _ "/.config" #:ensure? _) > In unknown file: > 0 (getpw 10837) > > ERROR: In procedure getpw: > In procedure getpw: entry not found This looks like nscd is not running. The manual says this: 2.6.2 Name Service Switch ------------------------- When using Guix on a foreign distro, we _strongly recommend_ that the system run the GNU C library=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cname service cache daem= on=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=98nscd=E2=80=99, which should be listening on the =E2=80=98/var/run/nscd/socket=E2=80=99= socket. Failing to do that, applications installed with Guix may fail to look up host names or user accounts, or may even crash. Could you check that NSCD is in fact available and running? --=20 Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 11:48:12 2019 Received: (at 34573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 16:48:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55474 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw8Yz-0004LI-Q4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:48:10 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:12863) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw8Yy-0004Kr-1p for 34573@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:48:08 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,388,1544482800"; d="scan'208";a="370061395" Received: from zcs-store5.inria.fr ([128.93.142.32]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2019 17:48:01 +0100 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:48:01 +0100 (CET) From: Vincent Rouvreau To: Andreas Enge , Ricardo Wurmus Message-ID: <1957885728.7840402.1550594881373.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20190219154202.GA5022@jurong> References: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> <20190219154202.GA5022@jurong> Subject: Re: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [193.55.177.134] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.7.11_GA_3706 (ZimbraWebClient - FF65 (Linux)/8.7.11_GA_3706) Thread-Topic: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed Thread-Index: /APxDRctFxwl9y23jfDalp1okQMKCA== X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34573 Cc: 34573@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hello, I rolled back all my generations (I hope this is good - with command guix p= ackage --roll-back) $ guix package -i python python-numpy python-conda Les paquets suivants seront install=E9s : python=093.7.0=09/gnu/store/9z98cvjm7p7z21xdid1ryydxy5vyz6wr-python-3.7.= 0 python-numpy=091.15.4=09/gnu/store/hsdzxq5jvb96yffnxqp8h4lq5z59r29k-pyth= on-numpy-1.15.4 python-conda=094.3.16=09/gnu/store/gabw5n3216xzbbsjsc5j5vhjpninanyh-pyth= on-conda-4.3.16 $ eval `guix package --search-paths=3Dprefix` It seems there is no issue. nscd seems to be launched. I am not admin on the server. $ ps aux | grep nscd vrou001 25642 0.0 0.0 112688 976 pts/37 S+ 17:46 0:00 grep --co= lor=3Dauto nscd nscd 135028 0.0 0.0 768500 4020 ? Ssl f=E9vr.11 2:17 /usr/= sbin/nscd Maybe this is not a guix bug but a server issue. Sorry for the noise, I will see with the admin. Regards, Vincent Rouvreau ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Andreas Enge" > =C0: "vincent rouvreau" > Cc: 34573@debbugs.gnu.org > Envoy=E9: Mardi 19 F=E9vrier 2019 16:42:02 > Objet: Re: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed > Bonjour Vincent, >=20 > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:55:58AM +0100, Vincent Rouvreau wrote: >> And guix pull failed : >>=20 >> guix package -i python python-numpy python-conda >> eval `guix package --search-paths=3Dprefix` >=20 > so the first two commands succeeded? >=20 >> guix pull >> Backtrace: >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 2887:24 19 (_) >> 222:29 18 (map1 (((guix i18n)) ((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((?)) ?)) >> 222:29 17 (map1 (((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) (#) ?)) >> 222:29 16 (map1 (((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) ((guix store)) (#) ?)) >> 222:29 15 (map1 (((guix utils)) ((guix store)) ((guix config)) # ?)) >> 222:29 14 (map1 (((guix store)) ((guix config)) ((guix #)) ((?)) ?)) >> 222:29 13 (map1 (((guix config)) ((guix packages)) ((guix #)) # ?)) >> 222:29 12 (map1 (((guix packages)) ((guix profiles)) ((guix #)) ?)) >> 222:17 11 (map1 (((guix profiles)) ((guix derivations)) ((# #)) ?)) >> 2800:17 10 (resolve-interface (guix profiles) #:select _ #:hide _ # ?) >> In ice-9/threads.scm: >> 390:8 9 (_ _) >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 2726:13 8 (_) >=20 > Could you post the lines preceding this error message? I just experienced > a similar case, and the real error happened before (a package needed to b= e > compiled first and failed). >=20 > Could you please send the output of > guix --version > and > guix describe > ? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 11:57:11 2019 Received: (at 34573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 16:57:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55483 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw8hh-0004Yh-UK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:57:11 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:46951) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw8hd-0004YA-EW for 34573@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:57:08 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C31A21A7B; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:56:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:56:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=wPGF18uDcyk6lZ26TAAzzQXQ 0RxnMwhGGUlRDgFrTfY=; b=FrKWmJ0kE5T+RTCg7DD8hLG88PEtMh0Wiq36eZxh 1GjEIwBI41QUXOouG/QzeREHINNdEy/Z7Lh4znKpSJERMBKfBRNg2pnUBea9bSKn HCQzdcJtnlDP63c7JiiZBt1XZ4pGdJv/7/VZBDambVUL4E9IFGJ8AeOLvX7DPF9d 1dY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=wPGF18 uDcyk6lZ26TAAzzQXQ0RxnMwhGGUlRDgFrTfY=; b=y9xBPbHDbrDQqo5jR/Lfs3 ZI17PZS/cQby4H/lQFSGGzFmYfyTqz+ui1IrAx3fWkXgb9U0W4MfDdxcI3uF08Ts d8eNelt0f7m54VO4Q7CkHbmgfLkGSSnEXGHWer2Ajq9P2gta7Aluol7ms5/6Ypbn pr0AO81VeOG2XErwLxOPl3a8l5cZWH69xXVsksrYJSdrNWkh+WYQlVsDqHPxhoxf 2Lb685QznCOnXoo++a0f7lOFmqVh/KraCnbWkRlzUH1YQBlFHweuepODzJUDNnAu VE6rmoYG/g7Vg8tEBwk2OwKuq4J75pSQ/oA8KlFiE3XlOac84aZ2V0Z5rdG0hNgQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrtdeggdelfeculddtuddrgedtledrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesghdtreertdervdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppeejiedruddvgedrvddtvddrudefjeenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-202-137.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.202.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 69540E409E; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:56:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:56:52 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Vincent Rouvreau Subject: Re: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed Message-ID: <20190219165652.GA7471@jasmine.lan> References: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> <20190219154202.GA5022@jurong> <1957885728.7840402.1550594881373.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1957885728.7840402.1550594881373.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34573 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , Andreas Enge , 34573@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 05:48:01PM +0100, Vincent Rouvreau wrote: > Maybe this is not a guix bug but a server issue. > Sorry for the noise, I will see with the admin. This is likely related to . If so, the solution is to either use nscd, as Ricardo suggested, or to edit '/etc/nsswitch.conf'. --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlxsNVEACgkQJkb6MLrK fwj3vQ//WyQnGWZHaN9UVzGbwbT850xf+vi0ReBP0PVK4DKLIKU2i6gNroPjLbRq VoGB8syIBtgflFdXK3WBKJPgwYH0fAr/hkstPB6FOAePZ1tRjaHAYL9YJsDUy+L9 iW8U95BQ+t9Besf9U8dih+c+hvHneYIxNNvDn0hIYeyisAeFHDM3LvjLtJJ7/KQN EszBsmEnsgcSfhqBNnYOqcMQY9NuDtKKY3ywQ8riFL8hQ5AnZD9Wx/hKFmdlSDdB yRGkSGO0GD/ig9h+8IyARYaOKVB+1TVmbjYkQ0qZ3e2ysWyjQehpfkSaMNfBjGxT LmZQ2zdjobeT+RADjmyLgVQWKxsnb7sEIQLq9Y8z9hTmFgJgquplZHwMjLL/kXNT f3rpalTlTYr6dWdtg/JBI8TA76J8v3nWqVexKe/dP4N64xwlYwXoKFJwlLlbtGun YhNr4J3aR4XPLKnVpu9qHmkfmKLxowGvdWttqjU/yr7tpZlJnyk0lQ+2Rp1qY5fU xP9sEGI9yJhO3ED/A0OsWeQzjMOm2g5lLj6NwweylE+Hu5jKIP2bf0BfeCdAH7Yu L36KciMv3RE4Z4KLTf8NK8aWVn21KucEMXxJiLee6tzdv78YtMnh0BGUqLPJwiEJ nf4yS0zE8Golsf+9sHXv5IYhZVmJQKp4CYuxQGkGxHL1DFr3tM8= =7Fzs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 04 17:02:45 2019 Received: (at 34573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2019 22:02:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60333 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0vfZ-0001XB-3A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 17:02:45 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:2820) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0vfX-0001Ww-P2 for 34573@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 17:02:44 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,441,1544482800"; d="scan'208";a="298081997" Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2019 23:02:36 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Vincent Rouvreau Subject: Re: bug#34573: Backtrace of guix pull failed References: <703275152.7669150.1550570158536.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> <87ftsjvk1i.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 14 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 23:02:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ftsjvk1i.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:08:55 +0100") Message-ID: <875zsynvr7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34573 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 34573@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hi Vincent, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >> I wanted to install python, numpy and conda on plafrim as explained here= : https://www.plafrim.fr/en/guix/ >> And guix pull failed : > [=E2=80=A6] >> In ./guix/profiles.scm: >> 1773:23 2 (_) >> In ./guix/utils.scm: >> 661:47 1 (xdg-directory _ "/.config" #:ensure? _) >> In unknown file: >> 0 (getpw 10837) >> >> ERROR: In procedure getpw: >> In procedure getpw: entry not found > > This looks like nscd is not running. Actually nscd *is* running but it=E2=80=99s been misconfigured on these mac= hines since a couple of weeks or so=E2=80=94the sysadmins are aware of it and will take a look shortly. What happens is that nscd returns nothing for =E2=80=9Cpasswd=E2=80=9D data= base lookups and as a result, the application (in this case Guile) falls back to its local NSS implementation, which in turns tries to load an incompatible libnss*.so file, leading to this lookup failure. Anyway, this really looks like a setup issue on this machine, so I=E2=80=99m closing this bug and we can discuss it further with the admins if needed, Vincent. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 04 17:03:09 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2019 22:03:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0vfx-0001YI-Ex for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 17:03:09 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:2862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0vfw-0001Xp-CW for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 17:03:08 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,441,1544482800"; d="scan'208";a="298082025" Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2019 23:03:02 +0100 Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 23:03:02 +0100 Message-Id: <874l8invqh.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #34573 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) tags 34573 notabug close 34573 From unknown Fri Sep 05 08:39:05 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator