GNU bug report logs -
#34514
[PATCH 00/34] Add more Ruby gems, some Rails related
Previous Next
Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:14:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #122 received at 34514 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:
> * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-rbnacl): New variable.
[…]
> + (add-after 'unpack 'remove-unnecessary-dependencies
> + (lambda _
> + ;; Coveralls relates to a network service, and Rubocop to code
> + ;; linting and both are unnecessary to run the tests
> + (substitute* "Gemfile"
> + ((".*rubocop.*") "\n")
> + ((".*guard-rspec.*") "\n")
> + ((".*coveralls.*") "\n"))
> + (substitute* "spec/spec_helper.rb"
> + (("require \"coveralls\"") "")
> + (("Coveralls.wear!") ""))))
Please end this phase with #T as substitute* has no defined return value.
> + (add-after 'unpack 'use-libsodium-from-store
> + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
> + (substitute* '("lib/rbnacl/init.rb"
> + "lib/rbnacl/sodium.rb")
> + (("\"sodium\", \"libsodium\\.so\\.18\", \"libsodium\\.so\\.23\"")
> + (string-append "\""
> + (assoc-ref inputs "libsodium") "/lib/libsodium.so"
> + "\"")))))
Same here.
This regexp looks brittle. Can we do without the “18” and “23”?
--
Ricardo
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 61 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.