GNU bug report logs - #34514
[PATCH 00/34] Add more Ruby gems, some Rails related

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 34514 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#34514] [PATCH 05/34] gnu: Add ruby-rbnacl.
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 23:47:23 +0100

Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:

> * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-rbnacl): New variable.
[…]
> +         (add-after 'unpack 'remove-unnecessary-dependencies
> +           (lambda _
> +             ;; Coveralls relates to a network service, and Rubocop to code
> +             ;; linting and both are unnecessary to run the tests
> +             (substitute* "Gemfile"
> +               ((".*rubocop.*") "\n")
> +               ((".*guard-rspec.*") "\n")
> +               ((".*coveralls.*") "\n"))
> +             (substitute* "spec/spec_helper.rb"
> +               (("require \"coveralls\"") "")
> +               (("Coveralls.wear!") ""))))

Please end this phase with #T as substitute* has no defined return value.

> +         (add-after 'unpack 'use-libsodium-from-store
> +           (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
> +             (substitute* '("lib/rbnacl/init.rb"
> +                            "lib/rbnacl/sodium.rb")
> +               (("\"sodium\", \"libsodium\\.so\\.18\", \"libsodium\\.so\\.23\"")
> +                (string-append "\""
> +                               (assoc-ref inputs "libsodium") "/lib/libsodium.so"
> +                               "\"")))))

Same here.

This regexp looks brittle.  Can we do without the “18” and “23”?

-- 
Ricardo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.