GNU bug report logs -
#34486
[PATCH 0/1] Add '--inherit' to 'guix environment'
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:44:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #43 received at 34486 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> skribis:
>
>> Eric Bavier <ericbavier <at> centurylink.net> writes:
>>> I wonder if the word "inherit" here might be too easily confused with
>>> the idea of package inheritance. Could we possibly use an option name
>>> that is familiar? Of-hand I'm thinking of sudo's '-E' and
>>> '--preserve-env'. SLURM itself uses '--export'. Both of these tools
>>> requires passing a list of individual environment variables, but
>>> supporting regexp-matching makes sense to me, especially with the SLURM
>>> use-case in mind.
>>
>> I think “export” is a worse name, especially in combination with “guix
>> environment”, which sounds like the Guix environment is to be exported.
>>
>> “preserve” sounds good to me, but it’s also a character longer than
>> “inherit” ;)
>>
>> I’m not a big fan of “inherit” because to me it seems to imply that the
>> existing environment is to be inherited fully, while the actual intent
>> is to keep only the selected variables.
>>
>> “keep” or “allow” sound also good to me.
>
> So, what about adding ‘--preserve’ (or ‘--keep’? I slightly prefer
> “preserve”) and keeping ‘--inherit’ as a deprecated alias?
Sounds good to me, though in my opinion “--inherit” hasn’t been around
long enough to warrant deprecation.
> We could perhaps add ‘-E’ as well, reclaiming the long-deprecated
> ‘--exec’, WDYT?
--preserve/-E would be equivalent?
--
Ricardo
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 74 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.