GNU bug report logs - #34486
[PATCH 0/1] Add '--inherit' to 'guix environment'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 34486 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eric Bavier <ericbavier <at> centurylink.net>
Subject: [bug#34486] [PATCH 0/1] Add '--inherit' to 'guix environment'
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:01:02 +0100

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> skribis:
>
>> Eric Bavier <ericbavier <at> centurylink.net> writes:
>>> I wonder if the word "inherit" here might be too easily confused with
>>> the idea of package inheritance.  Could we possibly use an option name
>>> that is familiar?  Of-hand I'm thinking of sudo's '-E' and
>>> '--preserve-env'.  SLURM itself uses '--export'.  Both of these tools
>>> requires passing a list of individual environment variables, but
>>> supporting regexp-matching makes sense to me, especially with the SLURM
>>> use-case in mind.
>>
>> I think “export” is a worse name, especially in combination with “guix
>> environment”, which sounds like the Guix environment is to be exported.
>>
>> “preserve” sounds good to me, but it’s also a character longer than
>> “inherit” ;)
>>
>> I’m not a big fan of “inherit” because to me it seems to imply that the
>> existing environment is to be inherited fully, while the actual intent
>> is to keep only the selected variables.
>>
>> “keep” or “allow” sound also good to me.
>
> So, what about adding ‘--preserve’ (or ‘--keep’? I slightly prefer
> “preserve”) and keeping ‘--inherit’ as a deprecated alias?

Sounds good to me, though in my opinion “--inherit” hasn’t been around
long enough to warrant deprecation.

> We could perhaps add ‘-E’ as well, reclaiming the long-deprecated
> ‘--exec’, WDYT?

--preserve/-E would be equivalent?

--
Ricardo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.