GNU bug report logs - #34466
[PATCH] gnu: Add coq-equations.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 34466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dan Frumin <dfrumin <at> cs.ru.nl>
To: 34466 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Fwd: Re: [bug#34466] [PATCH] gnu: Add coq-equations.
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:36:59 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

(sorry, sending this again because I forgot to CC the bugtracker)


Hi Julien.

Thank you for your thorough comments, I really appreciate it!
I hope that the quality of my patches increase in time so please bear with me for a bit :)

On 13-02-19 12:04, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Le 2019-02-13 11:40, Dan Frumin a écrit :
>> ---
>>  gnu/packages/coq.scm | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/coq.scm b/gnu/packages/coq.scm
>> index fa02f85cd..494c3404b 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/coq.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/coq.scm
>> @@ -500,3 +500,43 @@ work on a decision procedure for the equational
>> theory of an extension of the
>>  sigma-calculus by Abadi et al.  The library is completely written in Coq and
>>  uses Ltac to synthesize the substitution operation.")
>>        (license license:bsd-3))))
> 
> Hi Dan, thanks for this patch! I have some comments below to help improve the
> quality of future patches, as well as two questions you need to answer before
> I can push that patch.
> 
>> +
>> +(define-public coq-equations
>> +  (package
>> +    (name "coq-equations")
>> +    (synopsis "Equations - a function definition plugin")
> 
> Could you put this just before the description field, so this package definition
> looks more like the rest of guix? A better synopsis would be "Function definiton
> plugin for coq" I think.

I've reordered the fields to match the rest of the package definitions in guix.

> 
>> +    (version "1.2-beta")
> 
> Why a beta version? We try to stick to stable releases in Guix. Please add a
> comment explaining the reason.
> 

Oh, I just wanted to use the latest released version. I can replace it with the version 1.1 while I wait for the non-beta 1.2 releas.

>> +    (source (origin
>> +              (method url-fetch)
>> +              (uri (string-append
>> + "https://github.com/mattam82/Coq-Equations/archive/v"
>> +                    version "-8.8.tar.gz"))
>> +              (file-name (string-append name "-v" version "8.8.tar.gz"))
> 
> We cannot use auto-generated tarballs from github, because we found that
> they sometimes get regenerated in an unreproducible way, so it breaks the
> checksum test. You can use this instead:
> 
> (method git-fetch)
> (uri (git-reference
>         (url "https://githu.com/mattam82/Coq-Equations.git")
>         (commit (string-append "v" version "-8.8"))))
> 
> and update the sha256 accordingly. As an added bonus, this means that we
> can always fetch from the software heritage in case the repo disappears
> one day :)

I was not aware of that. How can I get the sha256 hash in this case? Normally I would do `guix download <url>`.

> 
>> +              (sha256
>> +               (base32
>> "1j7yarhddk2c2l4b6h8g5n0xz5vfy1bqmgh832g01di5gjwshy3f"))))
>> +    (build-system gnu-build-system)
>> +    (native-inputs
>> +     `(("findlib" ,ocaml)
> 
> ocaml doesn't provide findlib directly, ocaml-findlib does. What do you
> want to do here?

Sorry, I think I was confused here. I've corrected this in the updated patch.

> 
>> +       ("coq"     ,coq)
>> +       ("camlp5"  ,camlp5)))
>> +    (arguments
>> +     `(#:test-target "test-suite"
>> +       #:phases
>> +       (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> +         (replace 'configure
>> +           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> +             (invoke "coq_makefile" "-f" "_CoqProject" "-o" "Makefile")))
>> +         (replace 'install
>> +           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> +             (setenv "COQLIB" (string-append (assoc-ref outputs
>> "out") "/lib/coq/"))
>> +             (invoke "make"
>> +                     (string-append "COQLIB=" (assoc-ref outputs "out")
>> +                                    "/lib/coq/")
>> +                     "install"))))))
> 
> Please make sure that these two phases both return #t.

I thought that `invoke' automatically checks that the return code is correct?

> 
>> +    (description "Equations provides a notation for writing programs
>> +by dependent pattern-matching and (well-founded) recursion in Coq. It
>> +compiles everything down to eliminators for inductive types, equality
>> +and accessibility, providing a definitional extension to the Coq
>> +kernel.")
> 
> Please make sure that each sentence is separated by two spaces.
> `guix lint coq-equations` should be able to tell you about it.
> 
>> +    (home-page "https://mattam82.github.io/Coq-Equations/")
>> +    (license license:lgpl2.1)))
> 
> Thanks again! I really only need an answer for the beta version and
> ocaml/findlib questions. I can take care of the rest, but I would
> appreciate it if you could do it yourself ;)

[0001-gnu-Add-coq-equations.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.