GNU bug report logs -
#34466
[PATCH] gnu: Add coq-equations.
Previous Next
Reported by: Dan Frumin <dfrumin <at> cs.ru.nl>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:43:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Julien.
Thank you for your thorough comments, I really appreciate it!
I hope that the quality of my patches increase in time so please bear with me for a bit :)
On 13-02-19 12:04, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Le 2019-02-13 11:40, Dan Frumin a écrit :
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/coq.scm | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/coq.scm b/gnu/packages/coq.scm
>> index fa02f85cd..494c3404b 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/coq.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/coq.scm
>> @@ -500,3 +500,43 @@ work on a decision procedure for the equational
>> theory of an extension of the
>> sigma-calculus by Abadi et al. The library is completely written in Coq and
>> uses Ltac to synthesize the substitution operation.")
>> (license license:bsd-3))))
>
> Hi Dan, thanks for this patch! I have some comments below to help improve the
> quality of future patches, as well as two questions you need to answer before
> I can push that patch.
>
>> +
>> +(define-public coq-equations
>> + (package
>> + (name "coq-equations")
>> + (synopsis "Equations - a function definition plugin")
>
> Could you put this just before the description field, so this package definition
> looks more like the rest of guix? A better synopsis would be "Function definiton
> plugin for coq" I think.
I've reordered the fields to match the rest of the package definitions in guix.
>
>> + (version "1.2-beta")
>
> Why a beta version? We try to stick to stable releases in Guix. Please add a
> comment explaining the reason.
>
Oh, I just wanted to use the latest released version. I can replace it with the version 1.1 while I wait for the non-beta 1.2 releas.
>> + (source (origin
>> + (method url-fetch)
>> + (uri (string-append
>> + "https://github.com/mattam82/Coq-Equations/archive/v"
>> + version "-8.8.tar.gz"))
>> + (file-name (string-append name "-v" version "8.8.tar.gz"))
>
> We cannot use auto-generated tarballs from github, because we found that
> they sometimes get regenerated in an unreproducible way, so it breaks the
> checksum test. You can use this instead:
>
> (method git-fetch)
> (uri (git-reference
> (url "https://githu.com/mattam82/Coq-Equations.git")
> (commit (string-append "v" version "-8.8"))))
>
> and update the sha256 accordingly. As an added bonus, this means that we
> can always fetch from the software heritage in case the repo disappears
> one day :)
I was not aware of that. How can I get the sha256 hash in this case? Normally I would do `guix download <url>`.
>
>> + (sha256
>> + (base32
>> "1j7yarhddk2c2l4b6h8g5n0xz5vfy1bqmgh832g01di5gjwshy3f"))))
>> + (build-system gnu-build-system)
>> + (native-inputs
>> + `(("findlib" ,ocaml)
>
> ocaml doesn't provide findlib directly, ocaml-findlib does. What do you
> want to do here?
Sorry, I think I was confused here. I've corrected this in the updated patch.
>
>> + ("coq" ,coq)
>> + ("camlp5" ,camlp5)))
>> + (arguments
>> + `(#:test-target "test-suite"
>> + #:phases
>> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> + (replace 'configure
>> + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> + (invoke "coq_makefile" "-f" "_CoqProject" "-o" "Makefile")))
>> + (replace 'install
>> + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> + (setenv "COQLIB" (string-append (assoc-ref outputs
>> "out") "/lib/coq/"))
>> + (invoke "make"
>> + (string-append "COQLIB=" (assoc-ref outputs "out")
>> + "/lib/coq/")
>> + "install"))))))
>
> Please make sure that these two phases both return #t.
I thought that `invoke' automatically checks that the return code is correct?
>
>> + (description "Equations provides a notation for writing programs
>> +by dependent pattern-matching and (well-founded) recursion in Coq. It
>> +compiles everything down to eliminators for inductive types, equality
>> +and accessibility, providing a definitional extension to the Coq
>> +kernel.")
>
> Please make sure that each sentence is separated by two spaces.
> `guix lint coq-equations` should be able to tell you about it.
>
>> + (home-page "https://mattam82.github.io/Coq-Equations/")
>> + (license license:lgpl2.1)))
>
> Thanks again! I really only need an answer for the beta version and
> ocaml/findlib questions. I can take care of the rest, but I would
> appreciate it if you could do it yourself ;)
[0001-gnu-Add-coq-equations.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 93 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.