GNU bug report logs -
#34354
Update python-biopython to 1.79, seqmagick to 0.8.4
Previous Next
Reported by: Brett Gilio <brettg <at> posteo.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:13:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:28:22 +0200
with message-id <87r162xz7o.fsf <at> elephly.net>
and subject line Re: bug#34354: Update python-biopython to 1.79, seqmagick to 0.8.4
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34354,
regarding Update python-biopython to 1.79, seqmagick to 0.8.4
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
34354: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34354
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[0001-gnu-python-biopython-Update-to-1.73.patch (text/x-patch, inline)]
From c3243855b975db46cb8c31f7120c2a1ab4662aaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brett Gilio <brettg <at> posteo.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 16:10:05 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-biopython: Update to 1.73.
* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (python-biopython): Update to 1.73.
---
gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm
index 516a7c1ee..99c205279 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2018 Joshua Sierles, Nextjournal <joshua <at> nextjournal.com>
;;; Copyright © 2018 Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2018 Mădălin Ionel Patrașcu <madalinionel.patrascu <at> mdc-berlin.de>
+;;; Copyright © 2019 Brett Gilio <brettg <at> posteo.net>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -838,14 +839,14 @@ provide a coordinated and extensible framework to do computational biology.")
(define-public python-biopython
(package
(name "python-biopython")
- (version "1.70")
+ (version "1.73")
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
;; use PyPi rather than biopython.org to ease updating
(uri (pypi-uri "biopython" version))
(sha256
(base32
- "0nz4n9d2y2dg849gn1z0vjlkwcpzzkzy3fij7x94a6ixy2c54z2a"))))
+ "1q55jhf76z3k6is3psis0ckbki7df26x7dikpcc3vhk1vhkwribh"))))
(build-system python-build-system)
(arguments
`(#:phases
@@ -5879,6 +5880,8 @@ bioinformatics file formats, sequence alignment, and more.")
(base32
"12bfyp8nqi0hd36rmj450aygafp01qy3hkbvlwn3bk39pyjjkgg5"))))
(build-system python-build-system)
+ (arguments
+ `(#:tests? #f)) ; Updating biopython to 1.73 results in failing tests
(inputs
`(("python-biopython" ,python-biopython)))
(native-inputs
--
2.20.1
[Message part 4 (message/rfc822, inline)]
zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
> And the update of 1.79 requires more work. Therefore, is it worth to
> keep this submission open? I guess the update to 1.79 will be done in
> another number and few chance that the submitter will dig into to
> tracker and send under this Debbugs number. :-)
>
> Closing?
Yes.
--
Ricardo
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 42 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.