From unknown Fri Aug 15 04:03:19 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#34318 <34318@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#34318 <34318@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell Reply-To: bug#34318 <34318@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:03:19 +0000 retitle 34318 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running sh= ell reassign 34318 emacs submitter 34318 martin rudalics severity 34318 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 04 13:52:49 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2019 18:52:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59718 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqjMO-00052a-RC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:52:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50222) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqjMN-00052M-Eu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:52:47 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqjM5-0000vQ-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:52:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqjM0-0001IE-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:52:28 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqjLs-0000oE-W9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:52:18 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:47905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqjLp-0000mD-2i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:52:15 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.250.110]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MT74k-1gjgrd1c3S-00S6Aq for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:52:11 +0100 Message-ID: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:52:07 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bug-Gnu-Emacs Subject: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/w/DyCyvGfA8m7h/pZd/ibQ5FpSibqJ1MHxENI1crgBbd/vUItw v3/u9AFeGFF3O9/QzTROngqTlVdN2SeMmaMJzGdpTVQ+vhpfSdGsryOovnBhEH0J8COR/Ji Vbo3w09ZPYX8B5DdWVQgTRWV8nwWWsLMaP5V+AM2aF+4I2XKb+gWkSR+sKQ6iEPFmNLYNwA zSmwrLdCjXVHEl7Nm+EsQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:3eDqd397Px0=:sFBhniIS0V08iM+u+DkeRF R5y7/QVxhUrx/9OFeeZ30IZ/6q5Jcx1tUiXZlCvoe2jawENxPAIOl4XcOSPZoXHfpx1b9wSsi zD43LP9o/IQaW38ZMo7RVP/6D5OQtLn5gYeR+DJORlNTTbwwzu4KFuFuXP1nEz722KaZzvuIj XlZqLvQjypgyvsltuW5SPtuRlrFGT9m3ry9Ksg38XQk619J0NVg+Zr6XbVd34cZ+deZsz2kMf dgeQsZ3+00ArRP84Oj9Xoygxl+FLoa8MN+uBZjHj3/lBscarL+qDgnJ82hD2rKc0vW84lXn7J GjL02vU7G24exQ7dUIQKAeuELBtya4Od2/O/N0uvMTx2TH/jbxQcbCU054fSY4kz3SgF8t9WJ uEmzPSjJfqbhPIQDicYlh26pMYs7uTXLfW65JBSjPjontEwCZZgvfOpsGBqcQt4uy2xtrUauK mlFKBSAMhUdYK20xKaYfLfKW3P/i2vtFhvGqFUbny/35TgGueaF94k5aRPUkG1p4//vLK0KWq iV3kJqLWR/8+OUi3Fbp92q28MN7U2+Bw+ZFQULEQ0IG0me96ROkE3ZfPnuKkLs5gvJ75oPFWn oDulBWvVANcksVcthkcH2V1HuPOmPhAKw+SJtsMPrgZZzS2OdKSkDhCxpzgFb6DUoLQ/J89b1 tx8FPs/XpWUqeXN7ehzjWMOoYndPi9I/vgTtQSqTd9wBHW3Q9+yYA/aUatW2zhZTOExfIyJ30 wHNBaCRrDQcZE8NZZ4jOdmwup1oVnx/TI6DX43nvMNx+uNtyDsDnfDLtfU+dT3CpvrV8GmlQH PC0NuJ8hNko5MTvz79449vJOZDluitxkFZddIXegDYvQPph78D6j9hlcfulOfj9nfYNqM6n7y FzE8QE0ebs1R4mUY82LFJiAEkblMs7W9/Nx888UTIMV19X65wLljvIew9Fm7Gu9IewO8BLaji 3plev8eh36Q== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The following behavior might be considered a minor bug. It is, however, disconcerting because I have not been able to reveal its cause. With emacs -Q evaluate (message "2\n3") Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [46.125.250.110 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=rudalics%40gmx.at; ip=209.51.188.92; r=debbugs.gnu.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The following behavior might be considered a minor bug. It is, however, disconcerting because I have not been able to reveal its cause. With emacs -Q evaluate (message "2\n3") Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [46.125.250.110 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=rudalics%40gmx.at;ip=209.51.188.92;r=debbugs.gnu.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager The following behavior might be considered a minor bug. It is, however, disconcerting because I have not been able to reveal its cause. With emacs -Q evaluate (message "2\n3") This gets me a two line message "1 2" in the minibuffer. Now do M-x: shell and re-evaluate the form above. This gets me a one line message "1\n2" Is this on purpose? Emacs 26 is currently the only version here to exhibit such behavior. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 04 17:19:16 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2019 22:19:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqmaC-0001kl-4e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:19:16 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:43705) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqma9-0001kb-PK for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:19:14 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43thvN2Vqkz1qxkW; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:19:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43thvN0JJNz1rVx6; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:19:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pp6Bl31_JbGl; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:19:11 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: A+mt11Jmo6NVV7TVW6kRrYbUP5C+AAIQ3K24cAxo9oHPm9U2bnTfFC+LM3FarMXP Received: from igel.home (ppp-188-174-149-119.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.149.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:19:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2FC3D2C171A; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:19:09 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> X-Yow: ..Wait 'til those ITALIAN TEENAGERS get back to their HONDAS & discover them to be FILLED to the BRIM with MAZOLA!! Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:19:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:52:07 +0100") Message-ID: <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Feb 04 2019, martin rudalics wrote: > With emacs -Q evaluate > > (message "2\n3") How do you evaluate it? With M-:? With C-x C-e? With C-M-x? > This gets me a two line message > > "1 > 2" > > in the minibuffer. I don't see that here (with 26.1.91). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 04 18:45:01 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2019 23:45:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59901 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqnvB-0005yJ-5j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:45:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqnv9-0005y8-NV for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:45:00 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqnv3-0001pF-Hq; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:44:53 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gqnv3-0007Tz-DO; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:44:53 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> X-Spook: Shootout Aladdin insurgency Crowell ANZUS Montenegro X-Ran: h[l)uB|J`;6vq=zp\n3hl;m6$`)N#Sn_t^XU7SwV1cQE]2(5s2G,M97k+e:VD^ZpNC_rJ* X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:44:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:19:09 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org, martin rudalics X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) For me, with no shell involved, in emacs-26 but not master: emacs -Q Type in scratch: (message "1\n2") Press C-x C-e -> two line message Now type: M-: (message "1\n2") -> one line message "1\n2". Now repeating C-x C-e on the original expression in scratch also produces a one line message, forever more. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 03:36:23 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 08:36:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60007 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwDP-0002Jv-LD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 03:36:23 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:37357) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwDN-0002Jj-SJ for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 03:36:22 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.206]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lcj9b-1haU5x18tz-00kA8S; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:36:14 +0100 Message-ID: <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:36:08 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> In-Reply-To: <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Z/OSGKez3qdjwZzrIFKwqwQak59/2EtJN5lpqp43TiY3L6VDUNE QVWnRjbGBXMqqm2eCwDiAbvSsox2msGvMWtilIbI81hAmlZyOaHCcEkgnAqqCLv/j/qLABR pUAN7JSxYJa2oMe+bTI1BPSs7rtTtd4u0mnFLjP0oPUBW1yX+ZfMM5EJ/gABaOnIPDPuJZq lWj0g9xBYfa4Sk+d+/75A== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ubQC9Iya85A=:T+YoB34Fw+H9dBsRVZB7RM f0kG4f7POQuGkqOlLimjtThubc+FhdBVp+zIx26EH74R7OdvXypD/V/9AIfuj4YEjR7Hl5kX8 r9Pw5OLn3NUG8p/ySduodp3ZY/rY95orZb3ZUf0l+oAODqTTFSA/EN39fpOns009qH/3wkeYw f0g3eRi+xG+zTgAsjIxlkvo2Ri5J2kiLb0hrtDIlp/hAkyOu52Eaw+qb8KyGi/CVIAa6h8MmO 0uTTdeZiokVl4RCdJi0k8qoG3Y47J55i1DK/OHzeJgGY+/dc/r562jmcrPwrIF7VJzo3isu9e +9x0nLnyJGNJh0SSbjfLcbQnuGQJdHIjHxjLG1FE0vWDrsL4LDDu86IMmA6HqNE7ARe9FZjGk JLC1eH4gNtZoHFxtvffTi0j5WWwU+9aSHUs56mpc9G9VG/VoZZg6jrrRcUKUXiSmOs4TluT4d +FW7u2pKa8QyVtYYzDTDdHJsdBvQVZlIKO7LcavsOyaps3xvwHTKPVEAqCn09qMSDPRNcJEH2 PkbhDm43R1jSaq36CSDOYOYv8R+i80pwp6XJXth9s1EA8L5gQ2zw/j4Z7Gj3G/ZMDqbBCAw73 A4npWTHRodmK9lnjzCIbM91LTSdg/7vzJ7CtJLYWGn+YiKJL6qAFU8N5fB0SMXrjAe3BHuFhv 0SusfJJfBSjCfmkvAZMH6uuD/WzXSN5LTpO6XVNkaOQPESVgN/2M8P+9OWMFusfpwfGEJN2iz P+fHVQtoUzxmpAd2NXxsRrt3dtCM0AemVRjii543B5yQ1NMDHt7bpoFJJ8SE1GRN/Z5KvLuv7 RDggl1Lr5fVeutOXsXUh3CdeYIfFeYf2EfKln2tcR/GhipfUCqT1dDSze5mvmXYp35YV2nvg1 t8vA8jaCT8kSFdKdr7pQgWoy/Zk/Ynuej93LFac7YaVQ0t9OX/g/57lMFDVoKGeXmxrIR00ia xk3GC5CYHxA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >> With emacs -Q evaluate >> >> (message "2\n3") > > How do you evaluate it? With M-:? With C-x C-e? With C-M-x? Any of them. No difference. >> This gets me a two line message >> >> "1 >> 2" >> >> in the minibuffer. > > I don't see that here (with 26.1.91). Sorry - I messed up the the numbers from two different experiments so the report makes no sense. Note: What matters is the _two lines vs one line_ behavior. I'll rephrase the report now, hopefully correct this time: With emacs -Q evaluate (message "2\n3") This gets me a two line message "2 3" in the minibuffer window. Now do M-x: shell and reevaluate the form above. This gets me a one line message "2\n3" in the minibuffer window. Reliably reproducible with today's build of Emacs 26.1.91 on GNU/Linux with the GTK, Lucid and Motif toolkits and on Windows XP. Two further observations: Once the shell has been entered, exiting it and killing the *shell* buffer does not change the behavior. The *Messages* buffer reliably reflects the behavior. Below see the entire buffer with the first 5 lines after evaluating the form before invoking shell and the final three lines after evaluating the form after invoking shell. ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. 2 3 "2 3" 2 3 "2\n3" ----------------------------------------------------------------- martin PS: The scenario provided by Glenn is much simpler so let's stick to that. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 03:36:51 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 08:36:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwDq-0002Ke-VB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 03:36:51 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:39663) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwDp-0002KP-7A for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 03:36:49 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.206]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LrvBu-1hGsrv0w4E-013fsF; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:36:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5C594B13.4050408@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:36:35 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Morris , Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:CDAjEKySRq0C/KgXBGmKfZm6Udu1eYcvWLnGVVItRDhiWnidSjr WCnHYsssq5QuKK6Pm+Hw42pDc/5Ktu4/HoQSJU5D5WoZXfPlnDU1wsHjfofzShVnnvPxw+V 5+BPJQbvLgGWrM2WLgRhuzIJK9MdFCWWyzPaS8SWz41pV6XJY630aif6v/BN7GJccb32z8u podK2xUNSx6pBLNuqyxUg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Of5j5O8e7R8=:WyiHfooTbriLgYq9AQQwfb WDQR+meb9+JxIoGUu6VgvJFMw0HNmj9dslE04VpFCU5VmoZ7AfogKucbrUxdp/NcMzHH/d5Q3 s1mZW68mYCaKDX8hRVQJopN4IvWBJuUNZxNxoQEjVoxVvyqd5SYc2IYiHUovCqmyDdwsTjkCY ShdWJJ3zvtsF6LQoP3VnidH6qxyJK2YyUzWXXTgRHW8bu8Lpwt4l2YeAINMSr1JOKPI2+pfQU BqGzpF32i6iyVQewf0dBIAV40qrbzyJfrDS1WChStqPc5xjryC53lyIOtLoNFXP3NgEbYBe5r YMYOeLkjvraxpfGz3wvS4OTquZwtNlvp4jWsuLjE5DliaXVcaapZFlwBh7HJHKxaOu39VhWDH marOnYAN21aJ5oL/ZKx4Zn+cS4aNaYz+NQFhsZOHYbci/qkgwQuiakOuRtXQNUQdhlXC364V9 2FAWmNhMqnQG8DANaizK//k+0ni+16JrrfhkvxsK8QzsqnCfjMQKvOtutetd9YrUC1jOgPvho +KgQy8JYtaG5n5+flYZ0VDMKRRgEJNgyrqZSk81VJLfK8XZFmr+6+iiIJ5tDOQH/5PmTtcwhA FWm26ZhQxAt4BEzPb3vWhN3PdXgGjwqjON+iPi+CkgVoqT6mBBnV2XI1ADZ1sKP5XXSqPm2r0 KCkvPFC3hpHnGm1LklqoNgaH2OMnP15rtaIcnylJJTAgoFvv8DPbu2fGwQnKSDhPAguAkihSy VM2GYOffl1fuSoWOgEisvfDE0rxx90H/zGjH1Xz3dJKbPrBgrxNSuypMj34C+xAntZX9vkUA5 FD7CjDmVveS9SbRt/QtykNaOu7t8W/Y1RlB8FYl9cFPa7A+asLu/askaMNuoMDQPDAVghk0Wl wm4G9c8/humf+X0JdEtu7DW9gBuY+vy5LoP3vw+kN5g5weeCvTtHdxf/n4cUGvzLhVCtPeUhF Skrr2SmyN/A== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > For me, with no shell involved, in emacs-26 but not master: > > emacs -Q > > Type in scratch: > > (message "1\n2") > > Press C-x C-e > > -> two line message > > Now type: > > M-: (message "1\n2") > > -> one line message "1\n2". > > Now repeating C-x C-e on the original expression in scratch also > produces a one line message, forever more. Ahh... This is a correct and considerably simpler scenario than the one I provided. Hence anyone investigating this issue, please stick to Glenn's scenario. Many thanks, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 04:05:56 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 09:05:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60027 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwg0-000343-BO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:05:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwfy-00033p-A7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:05:54 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwfq-0001Uu-MV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:05:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwfk-0008FF-VV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:05:46 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwfX-0001Lg-Ox; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:05:33 -0500 Received: from [176.12.191.252] (port=48396 helo=[10.167.100.3]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwfU-0007C2-9E; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:05:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:05:21 +0200 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <5C594B13.4050408@gmx.at> References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594B13.4050408@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, martin rudalics , Glenn Morris , Andreas Schwab From: Eli Zaretskii Message-ID: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On February 5, 2019 10:36:35 AM GMT+02:00, martin rudalics wrote: > > For me, with no shell involved, in emacs-26 but not master: > > > > emacs -Q > > > > Type in scratch: > > > > (message "1\n2") > > > > Press C-x C-e > > > > -> two line message > > > > Now type: > > > > M-: (message "1\n2") > > > > -> one line message "1\n2"=2E > > > > Now repeating C-x C-e on the original expression in scratch also > > produces a one line message, forever more=2E >=20 > Ahh=2E=2E=2E This is a correct and considerably simpler scenario than t= he > one I provided=2E Hence anyone investigating this issue, please stick > to Glenn's scenario=2E >=20 > Many thanks, martin Repeat the same recipe in "emacs -Q", after typing "C-x 4 C-o RET", which = should show "*Messages*" in another window without selecting that window=2E= Look at what "*Messages*" shows after each evaluation=2E Does the behavi= or still look strange? Any questions left? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 04:12:47 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 09:12:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwmc-0003FS-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:12:47 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:45699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqwmb-0003FJ-Gw for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:12:46 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43tzPS3b7Zz1r0h1; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:12:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43tzPR2ftFz1qr5G; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:12:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhUYPgnP6a6O; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:12:42 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: xD/j1Hll3fbqI1e+0/IimW4cwUBfmjOOwf6FjbOMVAhpoq3Fj4igVWm57J1VbDSv Received: from hawking (nat.nue.novell.com [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:12:42 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> X-Yow: I'm EMOTIONAL now because I have MERCHANDISING CLOUT!! Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 10:12:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:44:53 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Feb 04 2019, Glenn Morris wrote: > Now type: > > M-: (message "1\n2") > > -> one line message "1\n2". That's not the message, it's the echo of the return value. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 04:37:48 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 09:37:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqxAp-0003xa-P5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:37:47 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:43091) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqxAn-0003xQ-DY for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:37:46 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43tzyH6zg8z1rJD7; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:37:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43tzyH5vl9z1qvX1; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:37:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wL6ZaKuuzg5s; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:37:43 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: P8NfnRAFYEsVWkK5OHLQRIK3Dy0HqPawGRkCiwVBGdyMEuR6CWQiqF60KHVh1X0o Received: from hawking (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:37:43 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> X-Yow: Hey, waiter! I want a NEW SHIRT and a PONY TAIL with lemon sauce! Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 10:37:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:36:08 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) What is the value of print-escape-newlines? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 05:21:28 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 10:21:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60187 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqxr6-00058I-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:21:28 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:44765) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqxr2-00057y-M9 for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:21:25 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.90]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUpFU-1gcanY1IY0-00YA3Z; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:21:16 +0100 Message-ID: <5C596395.6070409@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:21:09 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii , bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Glenn Morris , Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594B13.4050408@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:AUetP1RpHzk/p1nHdKV5bi/v7Hk+ZxgvnGhxxqrPdsg153Kf4Zn bKGhsem4LTUXtMzuguQc4Dpog1RY/btJ+ig0EnA035Qp8YoWdjMis7qWGCm7XLc0eYE8CHy K3egqFxdlHhMaq6gHATN9sd3p+H+SHM70++CRzg3gaqFHvN1GBF+qz0W980G43IbqfY5KlC OeN8gK0Y7/AI9xIhZJebA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:EVCIpiAXr6A=:+b2mc+60/In25yq6fqbqrg 2jIFl1crJQVh5s1y2QJHPg5prZ4TlQWosjFq71auNoeFjoHUSFjoVPv0mCf36b/1If6ypAgjb FP29bmriCSaqSp/wEyfxAIDF8nXjNoA9ybT55lpakpS08bWOA8pAP4k8SCD5k5WlEpt/7+56c fqUj0WbLFQihzYDKZOCGltvmsfKGGEqc5C6eeHb4OmiwBjZfOQFD2bQlz8nGZpArXvL3gvxdG gFOymt6lpADxcXj9sf+0IxR8HXkNBsKXE1hIloDnp1vmfiY9v1J0LTpTdInEEWLcI50utk6Xt 3g/2VmPNTzpRstrXuMVFL/8BeV/hE4eRY66YPNqLmtbCyRcH/AZfwPxfH3Nh7x5nNgPj9K2Uw K99T6jSNZdh1ervSvIH+IT6EtRX9gQaoTadEvVnO8R/YwiEyacO1mogjHQa431RVMl8TC3fGt P9IAKjXOJeEKhdRVfYI+TeY4ySfKtN2ywCS4dIbNJXlKUVYQRGUE0rpnt6UeVjpn8fH/ner/D WB7GY9eogXLhWY3zRc4CG1xZ0px8B18vNDXeQvkGt9rDpdKOtR3X7XlFsABL6aYldbxvhw4Mo dGH0wTk5K16qCp5iAY73DzRPND4zaUh4rSnahNf/q/4zq/Xtnjq67KDvY3rpJU/HW7yFg2Yso XBMD8UZlouSHkDyXpD5LP/7l7mbxsCycVWsXbInEMcMfFdl3xffHd0yacJaclNYqwBZSNeQGP zLe82XcutZj3UbVItcZvo8xDujODuZXoSyxlxB4cyl6EbKERPFhebDfGWZ8uqnY+dI+xlCxaP vsrO3fwyyge+WjwzWUtam6m+6kmupvcWia+biU3Mqj34XuizFhDzohMsrVzdeizHlp99crs6Q U8tywmAovSr5Z4FPjb+io1DIARtmWOz71VlGIihWziCY+ZyO/1qgsdZZqFQmukSDTvsWRjj29 P9PeQUdZl9Q== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > Repeat the same recipe in "emacs -Q", after typing "C-x 4 C-o RET", > which should show "*Messages*" in another window without selecting > that window. Look at what "*Messages*" shows after each evaluation. > Does the behavior still look strange? Any questions left? Yes. Why does only Emacs 26 show this behavior and not all other Emacs versions I have around here? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 05:21:45 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 10:21:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqxrN-00058r-Al for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:21:45 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:50411) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqxrL-00058e-Np for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:21:44 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.90]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0McVKy-1gZITw2Fns-00Hj42; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:21:36 +0100 Message-ID: <5C5963AB.4050503@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:21:31 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab , Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:fs/CtOzakdb1DJk9d4flZF6h3Wo8tZqhEgJOQNVvP4hmlryA7C2 QxZDczZyYmKusGGoaT3TqvXMK0EvwKNadzCTkdfX4tFRKAjm8r+tkF/qL+oXURArYRrzArt RvlQhYkBOfp9rIoVtHT/LhrAO+mFDwMk/iROVQZKxA/saRuC9CLuu5dE7HpRI2MDQoXf4dh FeouPvV4LflqxEU5eGZtw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:q5Cs6+RYgnE=:4dFNFtsG4NAHp37jp6fICN AqE/7tcF4CAF8cqFSvZMxhrEOKXBe4JUhXwKw+TniFKfbUmPsNe30KQ1XfNdzZkG24+q/xreD ADiGdZOHWWSGy+zKZ9a6RbBC9mKo8MuxQlG/XFwCkHIgvbMccAyErPNWZOgMDP5XVfT7gC7W9 /Z3qndmZsjLMGr37qwiLOhhs5MOGK0S0sEvhiSY/v9jR1XpVlcA3KKt0RPA0Acs7td6Z6PK7n by4bQDfzpuof/NjTuz+jHdSfmGwfoH37QZEJe1kKdpJPU26jl0A6uucSWeDzrO8fsJ2VR/ENA 2BJZOTXWrdqs77tlwFB8fHCzDCWR1bLpMOL73tzQbqa6TzDHCr0HgjLDsrL8yTrUBORQJktp6 6sNGsnLvS6Zef6Ct8sYRkHmYnzcmV8hCafnI8gDma0HB279ZkRffFfTncKt2HLfK5eTB+K5YW oRJn+mhsKQF3vgLR8e31yHpOckm4F0IioqQW19shw9VhUkUqYSzN0Yqw61a7mAKAxcpjlP31p ZEser0KAFdfHhdAjIy+dHkHOiYC8Zju6uNmkI+lyS/BnlGM2XAnF9hFsJEHfiMT8XWp4EOasJ E3rwnXX+Qb9Ie6DbBVr6qyEK0AS79pJZhXr8ELwQmfw0lSe6Qyc7EQlMvsA9pz/+nKzNAkd1c d2gC56TKtxYciwahy47kC/Aux6R54UGh8Y1Qayt/WIL55pQhfdYA2sMYWIoiGQTqksLeOhgae 3cTIJ4Zc0da20Selv2crUVGCPB2bQq5eesBGp7brfyEU5fCmFAQrdfEFXUGmPsXzqMwRsIK4M UMfoswu0rfacX0sOOASmb+T22vqSJFJjW0GH3u5FIMYpIdz+nz+BT5z/Q7ZfJmlUiDw2JT8PC FJyO1BltQzS7yHqAVF1b/g53zXMVlDOwiKwpKwMD23WTfQPSi4Wq21IZGG05P5wOTOkMgHb8v mBHYv7dNi3w== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >> M-: (message "1\n2") >> >> -> one line message "1\n2". > > That's not the message, it's the echo of the return value. Sure. I used this recipe because I found it in the context of Bug#34179 (and reported it there already) but could not reproduce it otherwise. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 05:22:08 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 10:22:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqxri-0005AD-Th for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:22:07 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:35999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqxre-00059E-Qy for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:22:03 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.90]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbMF8-1hXQAD35yc-00ktvB; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:21:55 +0100 Message-ID: <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:21:50 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:SGzJGQOh+bn5axix/sVc5x6dl2ickL67tEjoIKSpMOUJlAeXrIK bXtNrZGArtE9NdSQsP9jgPFBxywQdrUABcBCRtuS7/ujpNGc5ygyplOMadBjGc/5sJwdSF3 Ku4bcyj9aJSKNcjnbBK2H+ms3QI70LOZuRjmrVFJuaItO0Bt+/q7chJwv1BChdR9xhBy4u4 G6JlpWFiFySv93AlHXTHw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:SDSdJrYmi3w=:OgFe4NGBXdtq5it0DEfle8 uM97t9Zb98ScEPGxk64L60+jSBRQowyfAV0PvU1yEYIanxD7XTCCTpjrH/BBL1CDTCRHNYErx tREriMgdzkd3TeHGxpR1w3iaYkqSsojEzrx1HVwxBkACibQGjIT9kEQ8QWbQusFPhjXQwQaWW 1UsZbq33+pL1iw626L93lwa2eLWNQG6Unshu30vi5ywRpNHvhgbjPe+auJw/hU/BPa0C25W/7 de+4H7BGmSVP1zY3e2sPlecbHS1ohQhOPKQCruxSy0emSZEQBJAv+XD0NjVP1b6vImHuVZ0sU TNIog21ugzhoJBgNPDsZPsoU2uzOZT/Bvv7JC4LcWwjjs3+289HvhHj7J4KBbrVAjus1dzHpf Eau7MaGTtx4BBLD669YIzPlzpD1SE/trOSCApsHVMsXthvBPfzZokpdlusmQxOzlYO3jcxVl/ 59xl35ym4vznmPmE4qyGZTHV0/DD/ZheOvRjDUtXrR3owoNIi5XQw1sqFco4e+eELZeRRX97f WQ8N9LRne6wN9vRpOQuD19URemQ3KQZSpWHj1mFZbB5RorBa4dOPO3XEpqJo2llDaYOra50AM uCUtW28YvOKUskeKpzoPL7lSkQ810ERBNYhMSjQkkIykEJxHKzmzFpawl3BmefuEqxfQXwweZ 4UxkXMDm9ccbjvv52HIXdYLWwk1dLYHvw5Ga9g8p71qA5itZ9tfHFU7QxIehdDS/ARMJpmbfm I+hz5eiOPERjAuSu2dwcwxHU3l2x0ICEOtUc5z0GAPFVJZHR0BX3fbL8goqVwynBMEMDFD3/v AMq0IiQ+RNu562TZ9BZLox2DCc4iM+GohQmHIlYRFYelZ3LqIccNvvSmPZd/l9+jpAXVDvzXM eeFNIH/Av62FJKUX2qYcgpNzcY2ijp31XvqadjsnLPqLPqQ/6k5iGM1zX9ugaCeP2nLVEONud VrEX1NKCorA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > What is the value of print-escape-newlines? So it's commit a92e7b4ef6915e079a97e4e33e45b11508170cb1 Author: Paul Eggert Date: Wed Apr 25 12:20:04 2018 -0700 Don=E2=80=99t set print-escape-newlines in the minibuffer This appears to be an unnecessary and possibly-confusing revenant from ancient code (Bug#31251). See thread containing: https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2018-04/msg00654.html * src/minibuf.c (read_minibuf): Do not set print-escape-newlines. * src/print.c (syms_of_print): Do not defsym print-escape-newlines or print-escape-control-characters, as these symbols are not used in C code. that fixed the behavior for Emacs 27. Since it apparently worked until Emacs 25 we have a regression in Emacs 26 though. Thanks for spotting it, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 05:36:34 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 10:36:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqy5h-0005Zc-Mj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:36:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49241) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqy5d-0005ZC-Gg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:36:32 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqy5Y-00070D-C4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:36:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqy5X-0002mN-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:36:24 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gqy5W-0006yu-Qj; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:36:22 -0500 Received: from [176.12.191.252] (port=48434 helo=[10.167.100.3]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gqy5U-00012E-P1; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:36:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 12:36:18 +0200 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, martin rudalics , Andreas Schwab From: Eli Zaretskii Message-ID: <07F7084B-E728-4D6E-BA75-542D686AFCF6@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On February 5, 2019 12:21:50 PM GMT+02:00, martin rudalics wrote: > > What is the value of print-escape-newlines? >=20 > So it's >=20 > commit a92e7b4ef6915e079a97e4e33e45b11508170cb1 > Author: Paul Eggert > Date: Wed Apr 25 12:20:04 2018 -0700 >=20 > Don=E2=80=99t set print-escape-newlines in the minibuffer >=20 > This appears to be an unnecessary and possibly-confusing > revenant from ancient code (Bug#31251)=2E See thread containing: > https://lists=2Egnu=2Eorg/r/emacs-devel/2018-04/msg00654=2Ehtml > * src/minibuf=2Ec (read_minibuf): Do not set print-escape-newlines= =2E > * src/print=2Ec (syms_of_print): Do not defsym print-escape-newlines > or print-escape-control-characters, as these symbols are not used > in C code=2E >=20 > that fixed the behavior for Emacs 27=2E Since it apparently worked > until Emacs 25 we have a regression in Emacs 26 though=2E >=20 > Thanks for spotting it, martin What regression is that? Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any= problem with the latest pretest of Emacs 26=2E2=2E From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 06:39:21 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 11:39:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqz4T-0007FO-HX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 06:39:21 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:60069) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gqz4R-0007FF-8s for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 06:39:19 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43v2fZ0HXjz1qxJT; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:39:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43v2fZ0444z1qqkJ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:39:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dnPAJfHcK-mM; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:39:17 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: slyLX624AdrdRybVKuov6qKXILhlo7mRjY+uOYRRTnlmTIhKwTEwDZzzXk+OIkGf Received: from hawking (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:39:17 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> X-Yow: I'm EMOTIONAL now because I have MERCHANDISING CLOUT!! Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 12:39:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:21:50 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Feb 05 2019, martin rudalics wrote: > Since it apparently worked > until Emacs 25 we have a regression in Emacs 26 though. The regression appears to be that the synchronisation of buffer local and global values doesn't work. When I type M-x, then C-h v print-escape-newlines, I get this: print-escape-newlines is a variable defined in ‘C source code’. Its value is nil Local in buffer *Minibuf-1*; global value is t Which doesn't make sense (the values are swapped). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 08:25:20 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 13:25:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gr0j1-0003Xg-Kw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:25:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34951) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gr0iz-0003XR-GM for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:25:17 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gr0it-0007Fj-0P; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:25:11 -0500 Received: from [176.12.191.252] (port=48406 helo=[10.167.100.3]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gr0ir-00056z-Th; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:25:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 15:25:06 +0200 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Andreas Schwab , martin rudalics From: Eli Zaretskii Message-ID: <301479A8-0ED5-4F87-B866-EED49F798A7E@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On February 5, 2019 1:39:16 PM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Feb 05 2019, martin rudalics wrote: >=20 > > Since it apparently worked > > until Emacs 25 we have a regression in Emacs 26 though=2E >=20 > The regression appears to be that the synchronisation of buffer local > and global values doesn't work=2E When I type M-x, then C-h v > print-escape-newlines, I get this: >=20 > print-escape-newlines is a variable defined in =E2=80=98C source code=E2= =80=99=2E > Its value is nil > Local in buffer *Minibuf-1*; global value is t >=20 > Which doesn't make sense (the values are swapped)=2E >=20 > Andreas=2E I'm not sure I agree with the conclusion=2E It could simply be that the c= ode which distinguishes between local and global values is confused becaus= e M-x puts you in *Minibuf-1*, whereas C-h v switches to *Minibuf-2*=2E From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 05 08:44:15 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2019 13:44:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gr11L-00040U-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:44:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39893) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gr11I-00040H-PG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:44:13 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gr11D-0006cJ-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:44:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gr11C-0008Mg-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:44:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gr11B-0006bb-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:44:06 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:41591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gr11B-0006ar-Kj; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 08:44:05 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43v5QW4JmNz1rTRh; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 14:44:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43v5QW2Z2Kz1qvWH; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 14:44:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M0-cF-lwP-q1; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 14:44:02 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: ZbGsIo2Jbm0wrzW11cGi58GCwPw70iMC4G9oIHLY4Jg3YTOAwrq/DT6/NqadZmBe Received: from hawking (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 14:44:02 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> <301479A8-0ED5-4F87-B866-EED49F798A7E@gnu.org> X-Yow: Yes, but will I see the EASTER BUNNY in skintight leather at an IRON MAIDEN concert? Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 14:44:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <301479A8-0ED5-4F87-B866-EED49F798A7E@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 05 Feb 2019 15:25:06 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org, martin rudalics , bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Feb 05 2019, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > On February 5, 2019 1:39:16 PM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> On Feb 05 2019, martin rudalics wrote: >>=20 >> > Since it apparently worked >> > until Emacs 25 we have a regression in Emacs 26 though. >>=20 >> The regression appears to be that the synchronisation of buffer local >> and global values doesn't work. When I type M-x, then C-h v >> print-escape-newlines, I get this: >>=20 >> print-escape-newlines is a variable defined in =E2=80=98C source code=E2= =80=99. >> Its value is nil >> Local in buffer *Minibuf-1*; global value is t >>=20 >> Which doesn't make sense (the values are swapped). >>=20 >> Andreas. > > I'm not sure I agree with the conclusion. It could simply be that the = code which distinguishes between local and global values is confused bec= ause M-x puts you in *Minibuf-1*, whereas C-h v switches to *Minibuf-2*. The latter no longer exists when describe-variable is executed. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint =3D 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC= 1 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 08 04:58:32 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2019 09:58:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gs2vY-0006k8-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 04:58:32 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:39647) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gs2vW-0006jx-Mu for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 04:58:31 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.55]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHrk1-1goU9V18vd-003ZyJ; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:58:16 +0100 Message-ID: <5C5D52AC.4060501@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:58:04 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020503090004050408020302" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9B4jlk06yTmqwsq3DcWnJZYsi5i9J3d4ry9u/Etn1euxIyuyjEb AuE4KYJZCi/GCBS73kDV9gWpn9Hz+aAZocJg1cfKdyGd6Jn01LnNxJWmUWPHlZWOilLP/1p 30P7q1nVnP+MwDMbUgP/GGC9t5HTXFqW/ZiiYm/c97JkxwWcm/wmnFJ2DBUxtPkIrugR4yb BExz5pSkSCsgQ0ALR/z1g== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:9df2mKxz9vc=:s4s7F12OwFJaQETY6pTnHl 8CsuZag3s8/RFY9Emch7r6qPewSuNbNu0L/A+1ERdL+/6+ml5oKtxq6rOs65Kc5soVHERYUR9 KPXD3XyfXo8QNDy6aAMgqxP9QkQk6dYRMsIEeTPZif7AOoh+CQZ+jilgkdg34hSwpKwez8TYT 78i1y9Tlsh7jkBrCVu+s41m25Y3IFvUk32svxOyhn4JFV98vIUm1ZmUsv430X8YmxoLnAvQxr BdP6NcX8brDJ6/l0jSYQQDFX94rdgD5YN/YvBZ8IHoWZbt/0xJ45qDzB3FZSYoIaL609t92+4 52JLk13NU1k9Pzi5x/4CpEJzU4+fK3U2erU/SgJJgH0aX8X2IjBLDc4HVI9vcJ0TVmKYDWT+9 9593jD0sPboHLXzmLtTLKayiYFCc4lFT+IyC+6oQNheXZneMPORtP7gqw5gMaEOv+S90YXIy9 B6rAg/N04m3AjvEhrQslO5Ha2EaNDEpycKIiSRopqbp6gQUalKmyoDNrXV+2zYGz34LuO9jzW RJnG5QaYTiFcz6tJFkM3bOxHekl/OaZSYCl65XyZo7IEdEqNXi8NaR2vFFIYKKo2VSNxlKyan pqHens8bb3uziQyGYGwyZ81QyR+t20kAbhuYrK9MbFE2vmcwXkX+bdhenCQvHHiV6aGoAzG/p XsuhA97cavDkRf+GtHBlJiY79ivUiOpgrg5gCH6UCmd9o5wvKBdbgmYlWo3iXFAaJN/yPtBn5 LUrcAnljBVmp3wkWmZI/GTNvtpNlE2ejBh9jRY5Yh4f0dAiLrhVAkcYrZaiyYbqS4VjihHQQl HQpyplWgCU+FyHzNyS5zIrrX99NdevQqmg7g8kzKpKfiRm03WLeuAocrbiEStBdoTtz9qUZeo DC2vgTX4+lNTGlq05y0q6WSypQQXZVDQEvp2bvVC2KcgTNvAsqqdy1p6Q/6dEg X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020503090004050408020302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > The regression appears to be that the synchronisation of buffer local > and global values doesn't work. When I type M-x, then C-h v > print-escape-newlines, I get this: > > print-escape-newlines is a variable defined in =E2=80=98C source code=E2= =80=99. > Its value is nil > Local in buffer *Minibuf-1*; global value is t > > Which doesn't make sense (the values are swapped). The problem is with 2018-06-03 Stefan Monnier Fix bug#30846, along with misc cleanups found along the way and in particular Don't call swap_in_symval_forwarding since the currently swapped binding is never one we've modified. I don't care how it gets fixed but it should get fixed, for example, as in the attached patch. Bugs like this can make people spend hours of debugging all sorts of completely unrelated areas which is no fun. So please, pretty please review that entire patch again - maybe it contains additional sorts of problems. Thank you in advance, martin --------------020503090004050408020302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; name="data.c.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="data.c.diff" ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3NyYy9kYXRhLmMgYi9zcmMvZGF0YS5jCmluZGV4IDU3MTExNDguLmM4 MTkzZGIgMTAwNjQ0Ci0tLSBhL3NyYy9kYXRhLmMKKysrIGIvc3JjL2RhdGEuYwpAQCAtMTk1 Niw2ICsxOTU2LDEzIEBAIHN0cnVjdCBMaXNwX1N5bWJvbCAqCiAJCUJWQVIgKGN1cnJlbnRf YnVmZmVyLCBsb2NhbF92YXJfYWxpc3QpKSk7CiAgICAgfQogCisgIC8qIElmIHRoZSBzeW1i b2wgZm9yd2FyZHMgaW50byBhIEMgdmFyaWFibGUsIHRoZW4gbG9hZCB0aGUgYmluZGluZwor ICAgICBmb3IgdGhpcyBidWZmZXIgbm93LiAgSWYgQyBjb2RlIG1vZGlmaWVzIHRoZSB2YXJp YWJsZSBiZWZvcmUgd2UKKyAgICAgbG9hZCB0aGUgYmluZGluZyBpbiwgdGhlbiB0aGF0IG5l dyB2YWx1ZSB3aWxsIGNsb2JiZXIgdGhlIGRlZmF1bHQKKyAgICAgYmluZGluZyB0aGUgbmV4 dCB0aW1lIHdlIHVubG9hZCBpdC4gICovCisgIGlmIChibHYtPmZ3ZCkKKyAgICBzd2FwX2lu X3N5bXZhbF9mb3J3YXJkaW5nIChzeW0sIGJsdik7CisKICAgcmV0dXJuIHZhcmlhYmxlOwog fQogCg== --------------020503090004050408020302-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 12 16:34:06 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2019 21:34:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45287 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gtfgr-0000tw-Iv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:34:05 -0500 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:38819) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gtfgo-0000tn-Ou for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:34:04 -0500 Received: from milanesa.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x1CLY0ku011992; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:34:00 -0500 Received: by milanesa.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2FFF866140; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:34:00 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell Message-ID: References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> <5C5D52AC.4060501@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:34:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5C5D52AC.4060501@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:58:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6481=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6481> : inlines <7017> : streams <1812856> : uri <2795312> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > The problem is with > > 2018-06-03 Stefan Monnier > > Fix bug#30846, along with misc cleanups found along the way > > and in particular > > Don't call swap_in_symval_forwarding since the currently swapped > binding is never one we've modified. Indeed, good spotting. I installed the patch below which mostly reverts this part of the commit. > So please, pretty please review that entire patch again - maybe it > contains additional sorts of problems. This is a rather tricky part of the code, indeed. I reviewed it thoroughly before installing it and yet here we are. I re-reviewed it now and couldn't spot any further mistakes, but you know what this means. Stefan diff --git a/src/data.c b/src/data.c index 571114802a..ed6dedbe24 100644 --- a/src/data.c +++ b/src/data.c @@ -1954,6 +1954,16 @@ Instead, use `add-hook' and specify t for the LOCAL argument. */) (current_buffer, Fcons (Fcons (variable, XCDR (blv->defcell)), BVAR (current_buffer, local_var_alist))); + + /* If the symbol forwards into a C variable, then load the binding + for this buffer now, to preserve the invariant that forwarded + variables must always hold the value corresponding to the + current buffer (they are swapped eagerly). + Otherwise, if C code modifies the variable before we load the + binding in, then that new value would clobber the default binding + the next time we unload it. See bug#34318. */ + if (blv->fwd) + swap_in_symval_forwarding (sym, blv); } return variable; diff --git a/test/src/data-tests.el b/test/src/data-tests.el index 0069ee84fe..f3b4262de4 100644 --- a/test/src/data-tests.el +++ b/test/src/data-tests.el @@ -508,4 +508,22 @@ binding-test-some-local (bound-and-true-p data-tests-foo2) (bound-and-true-p data-tests-foo3))))))) +(ert-deftest data-tests-make-local-forwarded-var () ;bug#34318 + ;; Boy, this bug is tricky to trigger. You need to: + ;; - call make-local-variable on a forwarded var (i.e. one that + ;; has a corresponding C var linked via DEFVAR_(LISP|INT|BOOL)) + ;; - cause the C code to modify this variable from the C side of the + ;; forwarding, but this needs to happen before the var is accessed + ;; from the Lisp side and before we switch to another buffer. + ;; The trigger in bug#34318 doesn't exist any more because the C code has + ;; changes. Instead I found the trigger below. + (with-temp-buffer + (setq last-coding-system-used 'bug34318) + (make-local-variable 'last-coding-system-used) + ;; This should set last-coding-system-used to `no-conversion'. + (decode-coding-string "hello" nil) + (should (equal (list last-coding-system-used + (default-value 'last-coding-system-used)) + '(no-conversion bug34318))))) + ;;; data-tests.el ends here From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 04:01:47 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 09:01:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw1Hf-0003K7-Cg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:01:47 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:44163) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw1He-0003Jp-Da; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:01:46 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.134]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcSAg-1hMrVg37As-00jqr2; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:00:54 +0100 Message-ID: <5C6BC5BF.1010203@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:00:47 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> <5C5D52AC.4060501@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:CGIDyC9xCk30K422G5eqGTry2y8w+bwTYrFeYOlhKo/2lgecuZ3 hvE8ca47LGCEzJ7rt807meT9sSRk7x3II5fISUaNcxJiB8tO1uDLj0Kcrh1WGshNMRZh9QI 3lJVX7FE3YfYX7iYXlPl4bn6ncjfAt20moK0K2EoRhf/R2p5NcrxM4cM0j9Lw/CDHutUaqH kJ6ceceov6y4UQbCnd+Og== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ZuSy7eW6lY4=:QAp1gtsdzbjoDnVTS4ZKH2 BByJ8D/MVE0ZmSXeN88bh70K/HFXGbu+8ikzSAY9QLkZRphQRlgiY7DnHfsbov4VePfC8rVhC hAlspeEQNesZExW4dvwYmSdwH537os6TBj2ZtvGMDFIJpVn8gjzDiF+KPF5Cv5td7fV5fHBO7 nIotEDJtV3cnhMXtn1RZNN/yZgrAyUpotegTGd9MIzbDRIcn8HTwAE7U8s05xMxS8wUVCR9mX AGFSk+hHFW9jEvmI7z2A0S3uNeZYj+lCH8GuzC4w2uEeGlqRfBR/R+rb+rE/3PAEpsv53djao bCoi1cHYClNoUV8bwaYwK7Wj//KxOLibJuwea3WDNZ7jMt89P4aEly4HlAUBtAge/1cO0YZT2 +TqGAX2oRTBe4xR42z0Py+SslaZufd6dGzSFZb2FOj5d3WLhpfSpHew7DmfBkYSeLCmqu5hF9 c9W7XzWOnEf97kBhxG2L1D7Q15Gs1LlD9JqCkM8rzpA6X3Wemdnm0v2DmpqNhzHaBwEbXnTXz T6UT1+lG7X8qVwbTePVXk9K5p89YizO0ZBxfOQFvxZUqL/ypc9UO2B2Vjld5WHWNK+8uYM/ud mX8NEB140GNGvTddVR3iPCNl6BcxnBoEytzyMnXQd1aISNkPJa0Bz4tKKztgniR8WFJJELuGR 86xDkDw9ccGhRjbs/bu/TJTOerJioOVr8YxUhflNy48eOXW2LilY3BM6ymyE7+IY6rRXLOoDc 1EIC2ZTeu8Apst4s9xel0vkDiaRqn+CW4Wi7x48n0t11peniade23PYAOX0EcokQMrhhEyAzg tL5Gssc2oGjH88wUHKM3gVpfJtAB7BzOmyBokRVf+To8tDGCHdLekWAJmb3vg5+PbPgHI4Ltv /aT9KsEgGo+7S4HdxWWk4yKQK/8x6bwRyDyPuMINr9gYHKPjSXjrrpnwjePH56O5cq6leGYCD 3m5/uLxphxw== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) fixed 34318 26.2 quit >> Don't call swap_in_symval_forwarding since the currently swapped >> binding is never one we've modified. > > Indeed, good spotting. I installed the patch below which mostly rever= ts > this part of the commit. Thanks for the fix. > +(ert-deftest data-tests-make-local-forwarded-var () ;bug#34318 > + ;; Boy, this bug is tricky to trigger. You need to: > + ;; - call make-local-variable on a forwarded var (i.e. one that > + ;; has a corresponding C var linked via DEFVAR_(LISP|INT|BOOL)) > + ;; - cause the C code to modify this variable from the C side of th= e > + ;; forwarding, but this needs to happen before the var is accesse= d > + ;; from the Lisp side and before we switch to another buffer. > + ;; The trigger in bug#34318 doesn't exist any more because the C co= de has > + ;; changes. I suppose you refer to Paul's "Don=E2=80=99t set print-escape-newlines in= the minibuffer" here. Right? > Instead I found the trigger below. > + (with-temp-buffer > + (setq last-coding-system-used 'bug34318) > + (make-local-variable 'last-coding-system-used) > + ;; This should set last-coding-system-used to `no-conversion'. > + (decode-coding-string "hello" nil) > + (should (equal (list last-coding-system-used > + (default-value 'last-coding-system-used)) > + '(no-conversion bug34318))))) > + > ;;; data-tests.el ends here martin, closing this bug From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 19 07:52:13 2019 Received: (at 34318) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2019 12:52:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw4sf-0004VX-8T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:52:13 -0500 Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:33740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gw4sd-0004VP-Ew for 34318@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:52:12 -0500 Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x1JCq9J0022021; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:52:10 -0500 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8354266196; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:52:09 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#34318: 26.1.90; Strange behavior of two line message with running shell Message-ID: References: <5C5889D7.5020102@gmx.at> <874l9j9oyq.fsf@igel.home> <5C594AF8.2040107@gmx.at> <5C5963BE.6080800@gmx.at> <5C5D52AC.4060501@gmx.at> <5C6BC5BF.1010203@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:52:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5C6BC5BF.1010203@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:00:47 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6486=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6486> : inlines <7018> : streams <1813489> : uri <2798811> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34318 Cc: 34318@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) >> + ;; The trigger in bug#34318 doesn't exist any more because the C code= has >> + ;; changes. > I suppose you refer to Paul's "Don=E2=80=99t set print-escape-newlines in= the > minibuffer" here. Right? Yes (and the last word should be "change*d*"). Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 01 19:35:18 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2019 23:35:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40051 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6SU-0001Op-6Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:35:18 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f176.google.com ([209.85.222.176]:38614) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hB6SS-0001OX-Eg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:35:16 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id g1so6818362qki.5 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 16:35:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=F+QDUH8JuQ8xeqjT15+zNc+OmKlMbbMtVyZC9a2prfU=; b=U9R5ElBDhUj+B6ZFbjRlfdntrTAgHvDVznw/ZbPjSxtqRnXpwBLbkyyRx8Pgg+FUvw SDzF+gdmqL6JyNaCGj1ZvXWhkCFmbT47ZyOTebnxaVkNRhcOfHcSPwQdaqQ0/9lMHK0s lBYgKHrmc50HQX9TKoVu8cpWseX3AJ4Rv25F+oTFOW5IIT3lgiL4cZ2dayAgF3qiTdqz HtWiycCGvI43nzXMbhSEJdbm2LeTK9jljfIx4nWb0xtuwkT1YzTFkBNKthByj6XqjafD zLjcM9KugOkEz7kvPsBIhrX77TedlthHrQRg1dm0XBUF1kZvbF05ZndSkox14OQuyut/ G4pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=F+QDUH8JuQ8xeqjT15+zNc+OmKlMbbMtVyZC9a2prfU=; b=RL8Ip7s20A9MfmKRcJNp7BzGpfu5zP2Igp3vkHgiLN9e85tF/yC9aUT01PKmVO95bJ E8mYGudaDWchImmJZVMr+hKQnd81kePYmNWWU2dVZpHqduePCqxdIiocGIFs8QIoPPeF 0YfH5fPqetJbCp8yAK7l2oCKy+LfOT9dSPIwVnvFyJgcP40chywhMAJQRfKSZfBD9DUP vPyJStySk1Xyw0nLnzHtgWFn8ZdUMsUVZqHcZY5pthJ6O9QAsJXVhJ6c3oV1+7rM8Gl1 2Vf/r4f2OjKhLYMFaDQvn3rgvThKMy/rATPrpoWQIUIwigsrVJk4X1c5W6db4SDVCTcq djeg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbGkUxHEqkMHYzFKFtHd3nLcVr2CW8d72okupOb58oT9Y3XACR EZ4QU4YNBJ+46F2xsPJahJDWevIp X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqziaqe3aXDQFF46E6hL9VAcsUjf53s5AwFqsxiIoe2WpX/rWkZLyZ9dR5yqGPrUNvGhurgvvg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:4f45:: with SMTP id d66mr30895998qkb.170.1554161710683; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 16:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b7sm6106177qkc.47.2019.04.01.16.35.09 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Apr 2019 16:35:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #34318 Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:35:09 -0400 Message-ID: <877ecdi9jm.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 34318 26.2 quit From unknown Fri Aug 15 04:03:19 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator