Package: coreutils;
Reported by: Chris Kalish <chris <at> thekalishes.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:48:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Done: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
View this message in rfc822 format
From: Chris Kalish <chris <at> thekalishes.com> To: 34199 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: bug#34199: closed (Re: bug#34199: Small bug in cp (for win64)) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 14:10:59 -0500
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi, guys ... any word on this? (see below) -chris On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:38 PM Chris Kalish <chris <at> thekalishes.com> wrote: > Hmmm ... not sure of the distribution, but the help file pointed me at > this address: > > C:\> cp --version > > cp (GNU coreutils) 5.3.0 > > Written by Torbjorn Granlund, David MacKenzie, and Jim Meyering. > > > Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > > C:\> cp --help > .... ..... .... .... > As a special case, cp makes a backup of SOURCE when the force and backup > options are given and SOURCE and DEST are the same name for an existing, > regular file. > > Report bugs to <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org>. > > > -chris > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:35 PM GNU bug Tracking System < > help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> wrote: > >> Your bug report >> >> #34199: Small bug in cp (for win64) >> >> which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed. >> >> The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. >> If you require more details, please reply to 34199 <at> debbugs.gnu.org. >> >> -- >> 34199: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34199 >> GNU Bug Tracking System >> Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com> >> To: Chris Kalish <chris <at> thekalishes.com>, 34199-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org >> Cc: >> Bcc: >> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:33:57 -0600 >> Subject: Re: bug#34199: Small bug in cp (for win64) >> tag 34199 notabug >> thanks >> >> On 1/25/19 11:14 AM, Chris Kalish wrote: >> > Hi, guys ... I use cp to backup source systems to an external drive. It >> > works great (and the --update=number function is a key differentiator). >> > However, I noticed that (for NTFS file systems) long directory names >> > (\abc\def\ghi\jkl\mno\pqrstuvwxyz\blahblah\longlonglongdirectorystring) >> are >> > not supported (they throw "no such file or directory errors"). I assume >> > you're making an assumption on a max static var size (i.e., >> > szDirectory[100]) ... can you either up that allocation or malloc() the >> > memory to the input string? I believe the NTFS fully-cascading filename >> > limit is 32,000 characters. >> >> You are incorrect about upstream cp itself having a fixed-size buffer; >> however, the underlying operating system and/or file system may have >> limits that you are tripping over. I know that on Windows, whether an >> application was compiled against ASCII vs. Unicode functions from libc >> can make a difference on the maximum file name that program can use. >> >> However, I can also state that at least the cygwin build of cp (from >> cygwin.com) does not suffer from the limitation on Windows, and it uses >> the same upstream cp sources. So I assume that you are using a >> pre-built cp from some other site than cygwin, and that the limitation >> is inherent to the porting job of whatever you are using. Therefore, >> you are better off reporting this to the downstream distributor of the >> pre-built binary you are using, as upstream is not the problem. I'm >> marking this as not a bug to avoid it staying open forever in our bug >> database, but feel free to reply to this with further details, and we >> can reopen it if you provide more details that points back at the >> upstream code doing something that interferes with proper long file name >> usage. >> >> -- >> Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer >> Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 >> Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Chris Kalish <chris <at> thekalishes.com> >> To: CP Bugs <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org> >> Cc: >> Bcc: >> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:14:42 -0500 >> Subject: Small bug in cp (for win64) >> Hi, guys ... I use cp to backup source systems to an external drive. It >> works great (and the --update=number function is a key differentiator). >> However, I noticed that (for NTFS file systems) long directory names >> (\abc\def\ghi\jkl\mno\pqrstuvwxyz\blahblah\longlonglongdirectorystring) are >> not supported (they throw "no such file or directory errors"). I assume >> you're making an assumption on a max static var size (i.e., >> szDirectory[100]) ... can you either up that allocation or malloc() the >> memory to the input string? I believe the NTFS fully-cascading filename >> limit is 32,000 characters. >> >> (actual example): >> >> *cp: cannot create regular file >> `C:\\XDrive\\temp\\delete\\KalishCMirror\\XDrive\\Temp\\delete\\GDGBackups\\Presariokids\\LastBackup\\EBackups\\Devin\\DAS\\Documents\\eclipseWS\\2cov2cor\\.settings\\org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.core.prefs': >> No such file or directory* >> >> >> It will copy if I subst the directory name into a virtual drive letter, >> but that is not a reasonable solution to recusing my entire drive. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -chris >> >>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.