From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 23 16:22:11 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2019 21:22:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43118 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmPyN-00055V-DO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:22:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55942) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmPyL-00055I-E5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:22:09 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gmPyG-0001Au-8Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:22:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gmPyC-00051g-Bd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:22:03 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gmPpc-00060J-0M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:13:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:49160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gmPpb-0005zi-K2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:13:07 -0500 Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (cotinga-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51EA11A1622 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1548277986; bh=s9v/bsx577m0eN8a2noIHPZoMkmYs8N3pmPEhzya2U0=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=iba7IT6GDmewyAKKV9oFgcMbdVt1NXuTaDyxT6jhtZDUSkODtqOVeLTE+6/1NljHL o7t0yzpLIZdDFoLoFV9ZujrrTkZKKcJTLNh2BJLnBgxAaxtymS1nK2IuvEPZKNGEz0 H0JddOgGDdO9bU2QcZ2w8RmLMegscgG5okdsprHg= X-Riseup-User-ID: 5E099F3FE635B82512887050EACC6E62E92DC3FB5A096AD71FFB755B48EF0B02 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cotinga.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 83DFB432A5 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:05 -0800 (PST) To: bug-guix@gnu.org From: swedebugia Subject: Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform. Message-ID: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:12:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 198.252.153.129 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) "Installing for i386-pc platform. Installation finished. No error reported." After reboot: $ uname -a Linux komputilo 4.20.3-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux The i386 is technically incorrect according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80386 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 I think we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished. No error reported." -- Cheers Swedebugia From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 23 17:15:05 2019 Received: (at 34184) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2019 22:15:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmQnZ-0006ID-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:15:05 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:51016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmQnX-0006He-CQ for 34184@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:15:03 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.88] (185.220.102.4 [185.220.102.4]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5a0596f0 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:14:53 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> References: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: bug#34184: Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform. To: swedebugia ,34184@debbugs.gnu.org From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34184 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Le 23 janvier 2019 22:12:58 GMT+01:00, swedebugia = a =C3=A9crit : >"Installing for i386-pc platform=2E >Installation finished=2E No error reported=2E" > >After reboot: > $ uname -a >Linux komputilo 4=2E20=2E3-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux > >The i386 is technically incorrect according to=20 >https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/Intel_80386 and=20 >https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/X86-64 > >I think we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished=2E No=20 >error reported=2E" Hi, this message is actually from grub-install and is perfectly correct: i= t means it's intalling in legacy (bios) mode=2E "No error reported" is also= from grub and is very confusing=E2=80=A6 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 23 17:28:09 2019 Received: (at 34184) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2019 22:28:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmR0D-0006ad-5L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:28:09 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21839) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmR0A-0006aS-Gl for 34184@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:28:07 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548282450; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=csWjHtehN6pYveQnaK6B9DR/kIpGQTezJKG1V8SpEg+ADRSvSUj0gmaELjL0SGMzX0tQsZ2cgIhJYAfxIrHZPcJdrAnXWz4GnsP3SZyU6/UgGN9ZNPvAhOgSRP++V4MiajcS+9aLdiKfDLr5knGrCNXZU8rS/i4dfMpfUUP/erI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1548282450; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=g7f09+Nsw1h71cMC3RluFrp62JM2nB4FQx+2d1G6K9Q=; b=bPB/C/HDgcjJOVeiNW86bi1DJWJ2ASfSQ9Mlk4qOxHFfn60Cxi9FgED+IblU571QDZ9TwZSH69zP6evEaTetJxAsRaT0vjUVwI3NqkHTHgyVEWYNa7Zw77AmE2K3jAiZrm3lHTKT/2EWQCMRS/xd0kcsjjkpSOjjfrAN+o8XXjk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1548282450; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=999; bh=g7f09+Nsw1h71cMC3RluFrp62JM2nB4FQx+2d1G6K9Q=; b=JI7VTMfCzfUFE0zW+BYuWuWmfhpbXELyFq91RxdRzPyYcAnktT26uB87jxAhdCSM JYFKlGyXuZhN+BJUuH6w1aTAZftNyiGtMOZmKmSXEa0bI8+DC4/c3IPSyndIqBrWQRm XZGxGHdL7J+Xn+JylhoI9zywBHP8yDUz0h/j/MrU= Received: from localhost (p578E6B53.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.142.107.83]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1548282449822375.832524149527; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:27:29 -0800 (PST) References: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: bug#34184: Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform. In-reply-to: X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:27:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87imyf57sh.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34184 Cc: swedebugia , 34184@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Julien Lepiller writes: > Le 23 janvier 2019 22:12:58 GMT+01:00, swedebugia = a =C3=A9crit : >>"Installing for i386-pc platform. >>Installation finished. No error reported." >> >>After reboot: >> $ uname -a >>Linux komputilo 4.20.3-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >>The i386 is technically incorrect according to >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80386 and >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 >> >>I think we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished. No >>error reported." > > Hi, this message is actually from grub-install and is perfectly > correct: it means it's intalling in legacy (bios) mode. "No error > reported" is also from grub and is very confusing=E2=80=A6 Maybe we should 1) prefix messages from other tools with the name of the tool, and 2) hide these tool messages by default behind descriptive messages like =E2=80=9Cinstalling bootloader=E2=80=9D What do you think? -- Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 24 02:41:31 2019 Received: (at 34184) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2019 07:41:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43257 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmZdj-0003Ql-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 02:41:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:56508) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmZdg-0003Qa-B9 for 34184@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 02:41:29 -0500 Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (cotinga-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD32B1A0C4E; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:41:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1548315687; bh=d8qoWJOAmRPmqprrhMmMtxWP4Jdyx2k/oxtQvXdFaBE=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:CC:From:From; b=iEWqW7aHb84CzAkRu1QWuIo/lsCnBdrnCYAFjPH3Slcv4lPPMsgmw9TqjUI5Hb1g6 6WNxwABpwfL9XQTf+NbhCaWe19WKesSw23Nm7OWUqrj2W/L075bH8hBFoeDBnNBoFL BzO+6pJbUzrOQwB7EV0CT95x1Cu1DZICGh07jleY= X-Riseup-User-ID: F5367821B1BE5357DABE22F37B3667D9AD0605B7FF5E9DA4825F30D5B0C9A759 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cotinga.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id B680F4337B; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:41:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:41:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87imyf57sh.fsf@elephly.net> References: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> <87imyf57sh.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----TZMWZETZA2NZBVEZXP6IE0TCW829P5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: bug#34184: Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform. To: Ricardo Wurmus ,Julien Lepiller From: swedebugia Message-ID: <52EB70B3-A774-4BE7-9872-16503C2C1EC1@riseup.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34184 Cc: 34184@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) ------TZMWZETZA2NZBVEZXP6IE0TCW829P5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus skrev: (23 januari 2019 23:27:26 CET) > >Julien Lepiller writes: > >> Le 23 janvier 2019 22:12:58 GMT+01:00, swedebugia > a =C3=A9crit : >>>"Installing for i386-pc platform=2E >>>Installation finished=2E No error reported=2E" >>> >>>After reboot: >>> $ uname -a >>>Linux komputilo 4=2E20=2E3-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >>>The i386 is technically incorrect according to >>>https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/Intel_80386 and >>>https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/X86-64 >>> >>>I think we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished=2E No >>>error reported=2E" >> >> Hi, this message is actually from grub-install and is perfectly >> correct: it means it's intalling in legacy (bios) mode=2E "No error >> reported" is also from grub and is very confusing=E2=80=A6 > >Maybe we should > >1) prefix messages from other tools with the name of the tool, and >2) hide these tool messages by default behind descriptive messages like >=E2=80=9Cinstalling bootloader=E2=80=9D > >What do you think? > >-- >Ricardo +1 =F0=9F=98=83 --=20 Sent from my p=E2=89=A1p for Android=2E ------TZMWZETZA2NZBVEZXP6IE0TCW829P5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ricardo Wurmus <reka= do@elephly=2Enet> skrev: (23 januari 2019 23:27:26 CET)

Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller=2Eeu> wri=
tes:

Le 23 janvier =
2019 22:12:58 GMT+01:00, swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup=2Enet> a =C3=
=A9crit :
"Installing f=
or i386-pc platform=2E
Installation finished=2E No error reported=2E"
After reboot:
  $ uname -a
Linux komputilo 4=2E20=2E3-gnu #1 SMP=
 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux

The i386 is technically incorrect according tohttps://en=2Ewi=
kipedia=2Eorg/wiki/Intel_80386 and
https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/X86-64

I t=
hink we should drop the line and keep "Installation finished=2E No
error=
 reported=2E"

 Hi, this message is actually from grub-i=
nstall and is perfectly
 correct: it means it's intalling in legacy (bio=
s) mode=2E "No error
 reported" is also from grub and is very confusing=
=E2=80=A6

Maybe we should

1) prefix messages fro=
m other tools with the name of the tool, and
2) hide these tool messages=
 by default behind descriptive messages like
=E2=80=9Cinstalling bootloa=
der=E2=80=9D

What do you think?

--
Ricardo


+1 =F0=9F=98=83
--
Sent from my p= =E2=89=A1p for Android=2E
------TZMWZETZA2NZBVEZXP6IE0TCW829P5-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 24 13:44:08 2019 Received: (at 34184) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2019 18:44:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44245 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmjyy-00070J-Bs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:44:08 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:34967) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmjyw-0006zb-Jg for 34184@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:44:06 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0A623682; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:44:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:44:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=tSpxSCe4Zp4MoOypZwF1Oo3s AAmw3GWsszsIRDhbXIQ=; b=GDkIl6T9Qb6EzZEi6fh9GYFlK5L2Cm/VFbaSMKHa 7DPWG9n8APswHpq+dwylyCmD//gULLOgagqGW/ScJEgO3m77j0wO8hYN4ngEHC/i wjGxGRqYj7qLPFQHeMxc/+JuZi08g0kKOjslfJnFV0ztmJiIienIgjCqczNqDLQP Xpo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=tSpxSC e4Zp4MoOypZwF1Oo3sAAmw3GWsszsIRDhbXIQ=; b=kB0SJ+PYZI7zAZo99uZ8L9 DAbGn/jj7s+gU3TeTKTX0iY02i2PYSTNXzXEQoKGS+b7C5Bng1RSSoaxINEVa9X6 nGP+eBzLNFWsKdr2movvmtszYcEJ3QSoCWU49DiDE4zh7LwEbNV34hc6Z9VgmWt7 nI+fYMRbdVFfGE+8XhdpE0lqkFgvNfM2GyeM7wOSbdK4R3eA2Ep3gIanr5lRvSCO IWwrjUBoYgC6qf7U3NCxPzRs7hWXz6ZIEVBzwvflZU6+U4RQeYd0WP/cK9v0vgMT zVnB3Jcx1AYnZN5BiVE/tC1WVWswGsyFIlCyh65tg7/ueseRWXoXVfxIhpoeNXoA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledriedvgdduudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesghdtreertdervdenucfhrhhomh epnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecu kfhppeeikedrkedurdeikedrudelleenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvoh esfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-68-81-68-199.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [68.81.68.199]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A058310086; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:44:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:40:41 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: swedebugia Subject: Re: bug#34184: Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform. Message-ID: <20190123214041.GB5834@jasmine.lan> References: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.0 (2018-11-25) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34184 Cc: 34184@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:12:58PM +0100, swedebugia wrote: > "Installing for i386-pc platform. > Installation finished. No error reported." This message comes from GRUB. Not having read the GRUB docs closely, I assume it refers to the bootloader style ("PC" vs EFI) rather than the CPU architecture. I agree it's a bit misleading, especially to non-technical users. I wonder how it could be improved, however? In the long run, I think we should offer a graphical interface to `guix system`, `guix package`, etc, and in that case non-technical users would never see this message. --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlxI31kACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjfcA/9Hv1DX+mMtISs9NBWXGXsscLNfjNIaEZur3XBYLdvDyEWevx87dhZg/BN t19MLD9hL+6gNLc4TlOwi4FY3oDjYM7mloZQ/07rBePf8s2BKnsOHllKf/L7UCUC k9SnW/ivy4PIn1tiWK7t0cv7hA78pkJvrBT/pmq4XpGPc2Kr+0Jb+SMHhFYf9d9d tTUKvgwe83JAzz/O51NqlCGJY9g9xr+eZPYxRGqXnkVnm+zhVkE7IFciUaHhVZEo erFVCXI4L1TmPfT7P6XNwFKYIwioDx++raUWaUk6R/wdqKKCzgf+z1X2cMShQfw0 A+/xW72inKi/QxG1KUiG37UTvgrrTxlJTrAraBaS0dQ8kh91fHgYGgiK6VgXSkMo 8k/Z7Pb3dIYO0qJmhGqlzZDCReb23TQJc/nIWRAGx7wzp/BKCSZs5ynGAZnc7RSn SE705+h4hrQYMwfqbh5TBZZ2hiOzSB0DJv8phMmKEBVds6JoZL/2MqtBGQiRpSHT 7eQiv11b+tqTmgOCoC2o93GGkjcM3mX5RohdtrBPzbJIWnVqDWxEPN5MiCBv4HZ4 j+K4M0tNTkjNBlZ30Z7/yCrvRs7gGR5v3xhvcrHld+VkpQLLYYljUzaxhP7mCLIt te/fToiSJRXDdfnJttYG5Td++U3MPggWfMiQiu445BiptU3mg/8= =mAUB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 25 17:37:44 2019 Received: (at 34184) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2019 22:37:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45706 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gnA6Z-0004G6-WB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:37:44 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:43154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gnA6X-0004Fw-Rr for 34184@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:37:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2032E6CAD; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 23:37:40 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bnfNNS6nYjR4; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 23:37:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B15B6CAC; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 23:37:38 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#34184: Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform. References: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> <87imyf57sh.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 23:37:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87imyf57sh.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:27:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87h8dwmki5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34184 Cc: Julien Lepiller , 34184@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Julien Lepiller writes: [...] >> Hi, this message is actually from grub-install and is perfectly >> correct: it means it's intalling in legacy (bios) mode. "No error >> reported" is also from grub and is very confusing=E2=80=A6 > > Maybe we should > > 1) prefix messages from other tools with the name of the tool, and > 2) hide these tool messages by default behind descriptive messages like > =E2=80=9Cinstalling bootloader=E2=80=9D > > What do you think? Good idea, that would avoid confusions; I=E2=80=99m fine one way or the oth= er. It may still be useful, though, to grab the raw messages from these tools in case something goes wrong (or even if it succeeds but =E2=80=98grub-install=E2=80=99 made an EFI install when you were expecting = a BIOS install, say.) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 12 12:34:41 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2019 17:34:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gtbxB-0007kH-8V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:41 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:48255) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gtbx9-0007k2-8N for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:40 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97629220FC; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=u/fnxb4XLDP61P9mFj4zjZEFtyy1kgRM1imLF7wPBa4=; b=LZSIAVZlh9Yg qoMP2y1mV466jdzE0cfo0DqQM/hxVw6ilxF8ZCGMoMa4C96KPng4b4WN7iMWtgLx TZpXK9cu0eJigDXwNLCjjuOtJbHjtyT3CuS88YCXfLLolqhFAkautIrK4Ck0XUGG ajIEehvLmJLYLv1MabACs1J5WY59RrQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=u/fnxb4XLDP61P9mFj4zjZEFtyy1kgRM1imLF7wPB a4=; b=HIg8cRXMTIh3adnb25znpM+3Ag7SRrmHqieelqfnjJuBgsGvVzF0utQXe /v0F7dRNyL2BEicnuzzQMLZnnyVqso3c8Cdlr8OjOarbyifDDrD8PZ+KzputLGjw TmHfqDEMI3k3JzK6XHGJ8IsbKWCG31qNcLucmTOTBINFMYdesqco0IVM/1gsIa7c yGgXXd+JnlCWGwcyUOcL1tX9GffZdJEgC7DQ0xOshYpPvmXtPPwAEuKH//wbJesV /XzQSTZUhbHM6tBGFm9AXKMimT2XT/IjLbHwqknSeLsgm27tYhnMEqyQo7KLle2d 3e5dhMDGkq2Ooe5q9xb1Br3eEKBig== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledruddtuddguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecu fedttdenucfgmhhpthihuchsuhgsjhgvtghtucdluddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvkfggtg gufgesghdtreertdervdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohes fhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecukfhppeejiedruddvgedrvddtvddrudefjeenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-202-137.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.202.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 122D4E461F for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:27 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <20190212173427.GA26783@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: severity 34184 wishlist Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: messagingengine.com] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [66.111.4.26 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject 0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline severity 34184 wishlist --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlxjA6MACgkQJkb6MLrK fwizVxAAzfVpzJydTn5Wwe9gNZKXw/cBHWNCy8tNejsFxDwwZEwKQsoL6Fbxby/K L/7Qjc4JNT+KuJpr+pAPsltPhWATmizI66GbeQAcQ9Cjp8s1g1bxOkQj1YQV9Zuz kImHv38JXbHVrWFCiCstD51bc4xeD4DnPATkqmdOBSUOFgYvFDzL9deg8xVGCR2z TIYIJVaV1w5JdORqyIfNNd7PclF4+pYHqUlM61IjRyErdwT8spqGui8qNHY8C5G7 3zE+ozBmBlzyS19LkfuV8Fa53glF3vzC/EcjTdYs3hgUNvEWPJaVEFuDctQFER2w FzlOrxhYPngMuuzOPis2v3ySCbaGHqhSXiPm3PYsHBYI3bsiwoseKbg1tHjfCRKv xB+nAu8m65Un2ijTDr72Kv/3WIXvNXpy7MsK2J+6Iuqv3HHQMiq5/3QfEB5tStk0 ZyuAsSGc6fAbhCEnScKYE20zmwTgZpuWRyi/X2DO3gvY/iHhlomGdg+0GkzAsIiu fhcfGd6M7tUP41p7rmiIBJmGfij5SwLR8HQUJ3KX1nkSav27f+BTs7+9hrEiCLZZ qCpPE/6GqXhwLDGJeWp9JTeTqraBFfb7A7KSXxzGvI0I+u5tVlwipNCVg1U+xJEA zyk8ca6o/9XGJbi3JpkwoPKPZGxG8UCCP6cZ9CxU88bBdgeLNws= =ye45 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 12 12:46:32 2019 Received: (at 34184) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2019 17:46:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45132 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gtc8e-0000rR-9N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:46:32 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:44817) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gtc8c-0000m4-7N for 34184@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:46:31 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC04B23590; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:46:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:46:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Bi/XbZZ/qV8Urb2kikA/dRZH 2nd/BCwqvIlVEJ4mTTw=; b=W5t3TCowHj190wwNYpNlE088IlO8TCFbkFTczJuz HxiGMs4DvybrTsLTJ3vOtsa7Qyd7578ASvVfdmqSTdpOv2AqWEp0Errlc9/vJSgo bDnx7NVjsbk7pBo7WJYaHlfoxLPdMg9jJnNGaesTARhmXEDs46n3wKClxXDYKoOS n4s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Bi/XbZ Z/qV8Urb2kikA/dRZH2nd/BCwqvIlVEJ4mTTw=; b=ccSwvSTiqa6D6rbARxWLDt hTG2YMpGBvXkgvsYYwYIrSZRs4xaOA/9vE65Z6W7N2sxyVFRCzAtzOBLD1ncedCO q1G/KotZHhtzlzrhClmEDVtHiuqb4JK2RMbJuDXLSPgaU8pVKyEAproyjB2dcLR1 JQywEzbN0cU3sMpetPjH1ZWdPKilnb9gAuACWLvVfW0INEo88FP5jh3Ts4CO8oht 7qk1RRTTVc2JHlCB7McrNp8rPCIe0DHFa3vE4YR8PeTffuNUfHZq/G876T+gHDTt LrGsNB2vT2zbWGarrI+QeQ4jPt3z/TQSsiBfzHbZf96IMnMdH/RRN8923xGANeEQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledruddtuddguddthecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecu fedttdenuchmihhsshhinhhgucfvqfcufhhivghlugculdeftddmnecujfgurhepfffhuf fkfhggtggujggfsehgtderredtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcu oehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucfkphepjeeirdduvdegrddvtddvrd dufeejnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgr mhgvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-202-137.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.202.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C381DE4693 for <34184@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:46:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:46:22 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#34184: Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform. Message-ID: <20190212174622.GA300@jasmine.lan> References: <016c95a4-cd49-d733-29a2-80bd2b44d4cc@riseup.net> <87imyf57sh.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87imyf57sh.fsf@elephly.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34184 Cc: 34184@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:27:26PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Maybe we should >=20 > 1) prefix messages from other tools with the name of the tool, and > 2) hide these tool messages by default behind descriptive messages like > =E2=80=9Cinstalling bootloader=E2=80=9D Yes, absolutely. We just had another person ask about this on IRC. It may not be the most important thing to fix overall, but it's one of the first things people see when starting with a Guix system so it is important. --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlxjBm4ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhffw//aV+qsfEWnY1NIl+qZ87NEBHp3a8AuahCYZX6owVMCNYHMcMQUin9PAub L3/VdZ0aYYH3NWXXOAkI1TY7/1Vh3dJ+ivmysqL48B1zbAMfTBhWIJqLzWcjliKt iuEixKby4E0AImp+fTp7tnus7c4EPdU/EG7ug7aXju0u1o8UaVECJK70yGTF/6bB z/InM9KvgaXY4gefyp/hilWO8CRXvnwQHcN1A9kB8PgNaEKGQlkX0or+8HiUZlkv +REXzrZ4sRqGCcAbmzegAlWkNEb8PkBSy0uYRXu/YMP9MGV9eWAisiCZpTpzBsAy RcPP9wpc8FypUyH+UcbiX6OU2GPLtnKUfxGRudDm0llYrljfzr3fkEVkc0NcFPzT xHVIG6LRc8xAbyEsij9PqKkdxuksEHk6bUJcX4kKl8poDn1DuXTxfY73q2BaoawP Q89OqLFL1iX7ve1+eZVLSxj4Kd2jlNT9NxmIz5H6E/Qk6tDneaqYRRVYeZKrwcun 8by5t9ElW9EPwJreW4pOqfs7BPrSl5QGrYn50rsbWVSOWTdpGIBABIDjubSEKij1 ObYki1bAikt2OrJeIHbDuT2/XK99c/ckSc4PnSln7ZfkzO8rK5HrGzpXNqQQiDix I0ynuYTeuz3IWrcdfM7AqerOlUhnN7dOOrPZswHVmh+eS40A5LM= =K7EV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 13 17:53:02 2020 Received: (at 34184-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2020 21:53:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYzJG-0002vh-OI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 17:53:02 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYzJC-0002vF-LP for 34184-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 17:53:01 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589406777; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=LO5xPxXP0FBS+wfoI6WbTBshtfrNaPIFEU0hf+uKcFHJ7mQ5w2Krdikvq2rNMUg05/Qr41ahvL0ZkoMuP7jw+Z0U6JG+6mLKSRNpSYVSQwpDp418iiGIdZyGzjc0Vjy+HxhIm9UpnXoL5S5WsLkoYcEO1EbPMaVGAqL7sFXRMp8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1589406777; h=Content-Type:Date:From:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To; bh=sBQFlH6YAmCFd0J9iC+YdRaUYE4MtbsuzeJTxrHWXEk=; b=Us41sv9UfXPkDhBaxSPBPdO1t/Za4ibdRBbwTaAntxFoVy8G4oNV+iiJZznPoUKkORuynHMYhNjQI6r6c1Pp2JiWjKmnSVlNowWXkhSvRYt50Ks1+If7h/k5HyVD2JAszfC/jgYJhEFFrUX5eGUIFUhlRYFHMF0VuNMiv6nesOM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1589406777; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=sBQFlH6YAmCFd0J9iC+YdRaUYE4MtbsuzeJTxrHWXEk=; b=BZDkrVOMOYGAS26w192hV5MZyP0GsL8Zafs61KbLg8Ctzo7XvPi/bWCtPay/LNd8 0W0OYbqOoCS5qZEGyARE1dKypxC3VCI5DFsh36Z9kEjyD0GnnKx+Le3WZj7Z1w81hbo JVzx5nnzglj/jYTTqvfjFkxqS4lWsp5aOx53P0aI= Received: from localhost (p54AD4A2E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.74.46]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1589406775275375.2296542165659; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:52:55 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: 34184-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Nitpick on reconfigure message: Installing for i386-pc platform. X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:52:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87blmr1ozw.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 34184-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I believe this was fixed by commit 21fcfe1ee969cc477dc41486ae4074e655d44274. Closing. -- Ricardo From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:56:33 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator