From smeuuh@gmail.com Fri May 29 07:46:02 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 29 May 2009 14:46:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=4.0 tests=MULTALT autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4TEjvxq004878 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:45:58 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MA3LH-0003D9-DU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:45:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MA3LA-0003BA-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:45:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33857 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MA3L7-0003Ah-8l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:45:45 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f116.google.com ([209.85.221.116]:63099) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MA3L6-000116-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:45:44 -0400 Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so9447380qyk.14 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:45:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3sL+ueVTpPSfkAp7kPuGkS/bhALHJNKERD/NNGMSb3c=; b=vw8t7MMp63l6Mrqt/6AV0cHz895taV2oIhZtOOmb7nJIVd9ndJwSs9Xyimvl01OHtT srhjF0QpwcS5Dyeaa+ppkAhBln8sgkjOVWspD7quMPnnGvJL1jglvdKsFKfA6O1gQk0q pxDlPKFt3vjb4qf5zAD7uI4t2U7TWQ4TBZElw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=TUqqiRNsg5C9vlo621G+sIPIFmAaZgTqvKp31iFbDqcmydWQTlAjtEOcnqB0YEo9zP YQbaaVvKXezGKj08jQlxYjR+P+bbHgoYx6wOLGQ6JLFqYBkDmhLDJ8VNoG+zk6Rf8Z7B hCKHAIfu0eGJvOrJaANBi6Yfa+ojomWDGZNWw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: smeuuh@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.99.130 with SMTP id u2mr1091114qcn.29.1243608342915; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:45:42 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d12cace86ef2a384 Message-ID: <6fa54e4e0905290745y30d14b79y7be9a0b8f429833d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: c-mode uses font-lock-doc-face for /** From: Antoine Levitt To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b845c84eb76046b0e2122 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) --0016363b845c84eb76046b0e2122 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Compare : /** some file */ with /* some file */ In the first case, font-lock-doc-face is used, in the second font-lock-comment-face is. The first example fontifies with doc-face only if there is just "/**" : "/*", "/** " (with a space) or "/***", for instance, use the standard comment-face. This is using emacs 23.0.94.1, and was reproduced on emacs22 as well. C++ and obj-C aren't affected, and java also shows this behavior on "/***"" and "/** "/ This behavior is certainly unexpected : I expect all comments to be fontified with the same face. Am I right in thinking it's a bug ? Antoine --0016363b845c84eb76046b0e2122 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Compare :
/**
some file
*/
with
/*
some file
*/
In the first case, font-lock-doc-face is used, in the second font-lock-com= ment-face is.

The first example fontifies with doc-face only if ther= e is just "/**" : "/*", "/** " (with a space)= or "/***", for instance, use the standard comment-face.

This is using emacs 23.0.94.1, and was reproduced on emacs22 as well. C= ++ and obj-C aren't affected, and java also shows this behavior on &quo= t;/***"" and "/** "/

This behavior is certainly = unexpected : I expect all comments to be fontified with the same face. Am I right in thinking it's a bug ?
Antoine
--0016363b845c84eb76046b0e2122-- From monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA Fri May 29 09:01:48 2009 Received: (at 3417-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 29 May 2009 16:01:48 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca (chene.dit.umontreal.ca [132.204.246.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4TG1hAE017766 for <3417-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 29 May 2009 09:01:44 -0700 Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n4TG1cJV030717; Fri, 29 May 2009 12:01:38 -0400 Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5A3003A170; Fri, 29 May 2009 12:01:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Antoine Levitt Cc: 3417-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#3417: c-mode uses font-lock-doc-face for /** Message-ID: References: <6fa54e4e0905290745y30d14b79y7be9a0b8f429833d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:01:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6fa54e4e0905290745y30d14b79y7be9a0b8f429833d@mail.gmail.com> (Antoine Levitt's message of "Fri, 29 May 2009 16:45:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3285=0 > This behavior is certainly unexpected : I expect all comments to be > fontified with the same face. Am I right in thinking it's a bug ? It's a feature. This comment format is used by doxygen (or somesuch). Stefan From smeuuh@gmail.com Fri May 29 09:20:30 2009 Received: (at 3417-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 29 May 2009 16:20:30 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MULTALT autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4TGKOdl021375 for <3417-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 29 May 2009 09:20:26 -0700 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so4159091qwd.13 for <3417-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 29 May 2009 09:20:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=dcg3k1iJcI0N02f6UiTXOdZdngCvtXjBPtF+5zZ9iUU=; b=RNVDz5CGqArYt/ljA5X7iGjLnHlBUaV6pGw/enkTeUeqcbRH9pladlF5BizLWaNhzf oyXqEYBq7xxBB3l3R74AON1OSCa3P7+gGE9nyt1R9mUoD1S6ipngcKyd7O5MioVCAd54 FOzCmLWS+E5G5A+/gM6iSguPKUy8G9WZA25uw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=WZDHY5fMtuM5OAJdcKZzex0y9CBWuuPBpq/dDjKRtZiFG9f6+llRXwWOSnUorExHaX uX9GtAun0YpW0FdhTJaIknmCbSGUkJOopMUW7vdfBuz81btQNth/bMnJVDSqujllXKdc ufq+vaFVJvNL4ldSDTZuHIREiToOdpXCvJro4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: smeuuh@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.97.202 with SMTP id m10mr1169337qcn.77.1243614024257; Fri, 29 May 2009 09:20:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6fa54e4e0905290745y30d14b79y7be9a0b8f429833d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:20:24 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ce1e6bbef678e7a5 Message-ID: <6fa54e4e0905290920i5d328714i98cd1293a754b5f9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: bug#3417: c-mode uses font-lock-doc-face for /** From: Antoine Levitt To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 3417-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368320722755bb046b0f7445 --0016368320722755bb046b0f7445 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ok, it makes sense. But how comes "/** " (with a space) isn't fontified, when it is in other modes like java ? There is no obvious difference between : /** * some comment */ and /** * some comment */ , but they are fontified differently (the second has a space after the /**). 2009/5/29 Stefan Monnier > > This behavior is certainly unexpected : I expect all comments to be > > fontified with the same face. Am I right in thinking it's a bug ? > > It's a feature. This comment format is used by doxygen (or somesuch). > > > Stefan > --0016368320722755bb046b0f7445 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, it makes sense.

But how comes "/** " (with a space) is= n't fontified, when it is in other modes like java ? There is no obviou= s difference between :
/**
* some comment */
and
/**
* some= comment */
, but they are fontified differently (the second has a space after the /**)= .

--0016368320722755bb046b0f7445-- From rudalics@gmx.at Fri May 29 09:47:05 2009 Received: (at 3417) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 29 May 2009 16:47:05 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n4TGl0V6025911 for <3417@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 29 May 2009 09:47:01 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 May 2009 16:46:54 -0000 Received: from 62-47-37-185.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.37.185]) [62.47.37.185] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 29 May 2009 18:46:54 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18PFw0n9Q0PJ31BK8NJQp70ZGtAplr161iSLM5r5V sD0eIo8+FzI2tN Message-ID: <4A20117B.8040605@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:46:51 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antoine Levitt , 3417@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#3417: c-mode uses font-lock-doc-face for /** References: <6fa54e4e0905290745y30d14b79y7be9a0b8f429833d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6fa54e4e0905290745y30d14b79y7be9a0b8f429833d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.67 > Compare : > /** > some file > */ > with > /* > some file > */ > > In the first case, font-lock-doc-face is used, in the second > font-lock-comment-face is. > > The first example fontifies with doc-face only if there is just "/**" : > "/*", "/** " (with a space) or "/***", for instance, use the standard > comment-face. > > This is using emacs 23.0.94.1, and was reproduced on emacs22 as well. C++ > and obj-C aren't affected, and java also shows this behavior on "/***"" and > "/** "/ > > This behavior is certainly unexpected : I expect all comments to be > fontified with the same face. Am I right in thinking it's a bug ? Have you tried to customize `c-doc-comment-style'? martin From smeuuh@gmail.com Fri May 29 10:03:15 2009 Received: (at 3417) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 29 May 2009 17:03:15 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MULTALT autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com (mail-qy0-f178.google.com [209.85.221.178]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4TH3AjK028488 for <3417@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:03:11 -0700 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so8321741qyk.19 for <3417@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:03:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=W+OwTvzF1V2/7RoHslGfZRO1ln6nDtIF8WM1d4mHcHk=; b=ufb6BTjej0cgV3uif3KY2LdU4Re3MmHUO96XQhvx/5Luvb7Wcco40a8IbbTpZppzd0 sSMULLJyxUT/7qaMqvRT+Jo+DrA9Wv41pbAbFgC5US6HUNPjIaYb6W//l7+Tnra/Hewc T1h2nqYQFwjtpkt3DRg6h0Tb2dBk4H4QLaJ5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=wb0ZuQ/7P68o303zaT75hk3ls+LO0RxxU03h3ftwdV573g4B7AiJ0ui6X862ykHYyC S3gvfPv8O9k5/A8VdniEHQjvOrnNq5XM748n2Of0rRcVbhXfh4rc/4ybPFCHvuv/+Z7m kh5mGOZOOX3f9I8ZB7BnsKoVGiMaHguify5nU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: smeuuh@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.97.194 with SMTP id m2mr1164600qcn.21.1243616585155; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:03:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A20117B.8040605@gmx.at> References: <6fa54e4e0905290745y30d14b79y7be9a0b8f429833d@mail.gmail.com> <4A20117B.8040605@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 19:03:05 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c4679cb48bb6e6c8 Message-ID: <6fa54e4e0905291003k55d24a6dncebf416b28062f40@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: bug#3417: c-mode uses font-lock-doc-face for /** From: Antoine Levitt To: martin rudalics Cc: 3417@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368324eacb88db046b100c15 --0016368324eacb88db046b100c15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Using your variable as a starting point, I found this : for gtkdoc (default in C), regexp is : (c-font-lock-doc-comments "/\\*\\*$" limit gtkdoc-font-lock-doc-comments) for javadoc, it's : (c-font-lock-doc-comments "/\\*\\*" limit javadoc-font-lock-doc-comments))))) Gtkdoc manual specifies : A multiline comment that starts with an additional '*' marks a documentation block that will be processed by the Gtk-Doc tools. Shouldn't the regexp for gtkdoc be "/\\*\\*" then ? (without the $) 2009/5/29 martin rudalics > > Compare : > > /** > > some file > > */ > > with > > /* > > some file > > */ > > > > In the first case, font-lock-doc-face is used, in the second > > font-lock-comment-face is. > > > > The first example fontifies with doc-face only if there is just "/**" : > > "/*", "/** " (with a space) or "/***", for instance, use the standard > > comment-face. > > > > This is using emacs 23.0.94.1, and was reproduced on emacs22 as well. C++ > > and obj-C aren't affected, and java also shows this behavior on "/***"" > and > > "/** "/ > > > > This behavior is certainly unexpected : I expect all comments to be > > fontified with the same face. Am I right in thinking it's a bug ? > > Have you tried to customize `c-doc-comment-style'? > > martin > --0016368324eacb88db046b100c15 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Using your variable as a starting point, I found this :
for gtkdoc (defa= ult in C), regexp is :
=A0=A0=A0 (c-font-lock-doc-comments "/\\*\\*= $" limit
=A0=A0=A0 =A0 gtkdoc-font-lock-doc-comments)

for ja= vadoc, it's :=A0=A0=A0
(c-font-lock-doc-comments "/\\*\\*" limit
=A0=A0=A0 =A0 javado= c-font-lock-doc-comments)))))

Gtkdoc manual specifies :

A multiline comment that starts with an additional '*' mark= s a documentation block that will be processed by the Gtk-Doc tools.

Shouldn't the regexp for gtkdoc be= "/\\*\\*" then ? (without the $)

2009/5/29 martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> Compare :
> /**
> some file
> */
> with
> /*
> some file
> */
>
> In the first case, font-lock-doc-face is used, in the second
> font-lock-comment-face is.
>
> The first example fontifies with doc-face only if there is just "= /**" :
> "/*", "/** " (with a space) or "/***", f= or instance, use the standard
> comment-face.
>
> This is using emacs 23.0.94.1, and was reproduced on emacs22 as well. = C++
> and obj-C aren't affected, and java also shows this behavior on &q= uot;/***"" and
> "/** "/
>
> This behavior is certainly unexpected : I expect all comments to be > fontified with the same face. Am I right in thinking it's a bug ?<= br>
Have you tried to customize `c-doc-comment-style'?

martin

--0016368324eacb88db046b100c15-- From rudalics@gmx.at Fri May 29 10:10:58 2009 Received: (at 3417) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 29 May 2009 17:10:59 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n4THAsVf030442 for <3417@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:10:55 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 May 2009 17:10:48 -0000 Received: from 62-47-37-185.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.37.185]) [62.47.37.185] by mail.gmx.net (mp061) with SMTP; 29 May 2009 19:10:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19iZzg01xti5x96k809SfRS9vVaF7kO1x3OqowGrq XK5T3YMkANZEZK Message-ID: <4A201715.3080800@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 19:10:45 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antoine Levitt CC: 3417@debbugs.gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie Subject: Re: bug#3417: c-mode uses font-lock-doc-face for /** References: <6fa54e4e0905290745y30d14b79y7be9a0b8f429833d@mail.gmail.com> <4A20117B.8040605@gmx.at> <6fa54e4e0905291003k55d24a6dncebf416b28062f40@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6fa54e4e0905291003k55d24a6dncebf416b28062f40@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6899999999999999 > Using your variable as a starting point, I found this : > for gtkdoc (default in C), regexp is : > (c-font-lock-doc-comments "/\\*\\*$" limit > gtkdoc-font-lock-doc-comments) > > for javadoc, it's : > (c-font-lock-doc-comments "/\\*\\*" limit > javadoc-font-lock-doc-comments))))) > > Gtkdoc manual specifies : > > A multiline comment that starts with an additional '*' marks a documentation > block that will be processed by the Gtk-Doc tools. > > Shouldn't the regexp for gtkdoc be "/\\*\\*" then ? (without the $) I don't have the slightest idea about these conventions. That's in the domain of Mr. Mackenzie. Good evening, Alan ... martin From unknown Mon Jun 16 23:48:13 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: $requester Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:24:18 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # A New Hope # A log time ago, in a galaxy far, far away # something happened. # # Magically this resulted in the following # action being taken, but this fake control # message doesn't tell you why it happened # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator