GNU bug report logs -
#34162
linux-libre 4.20+ fails to mount ext4 on aarch64
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:02:31 -0500
with message-id <87imyeln2l.fsf <at> netris.org>
and subject line Re: bug#34162: linux-libre 4.20+ fails to mount ext4 on aarch64
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34162,
regarding linux-libre 4.20+ fails to mount ext4 on aarch64
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
34162: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34162
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
After upgrading to linux-libre 4.20, and again tested with 4.20.3, an
aarch64 system failed to boot (using 4.19.10 worked fine):
[ 3.692351] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.39.0-ioctl (2018-04-03) initialised: dm-devel <at> redhat.com
ext2fs_check_if_mount: Can't check if filesystem is mounted due to missing mtab file while determining whether /dev/sda6 is mounted.
/dev/sda6: clean, 596262/6553600 files, 7663147/26214400 blocks
[ 3.948786] EXT4-fs (sda6): Cannot load crc32c driver.
ERROR: In procedure mount:
In procedure mount: No such file or directory
Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
GNU Guile 2.2.4
Copyright (C) 1995-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details.
Enter `,help' for help.
scheme@(guile-user)>
Workaround or fix was to add to config.scm:
(initrd (append (list "crc32c_generic" ... ) %base-initrd-modules))
4.19.10 and earlier worked fine without this addition; as far as I can
see the relevent kernel configurations are all present; but some
behavior changed with the ext4 driver; Is the initrd no longer including
soft module dependencies? (e.g. for optional ext4 features)
This seems similar to Debian bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/819725
live well,
vagrant
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> writes:
> On 2019-01-23, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Here's a proposed (untested) patch. Would you like to test it and see
>> if it eliminates the need for this workaround?
>
> It did, thanks!
Okay, I pushed it to master, commit
ff0b73028c0bbbcbf352989ed3863947357c3bce.
I'm closing this bug report.
Thanks!
Mark
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 119 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.