Subject: Re: bug#34140: AddressSanitizer reported heap-buffer-overflow when ignoring case

From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:44:26 -0800

On 1/22/19 12:44 AM, [email-masked] wrote:
> If I may beg to differ, I see no reason that GNULIB can't be
> ahead of GLIBC.
The only reason is avoiding hassle: I'd have to decouple this gnulib 
file from glibc now (which requires changing some other administrative 
file), and then recouple it later. If this bug were important I'd be 
inclined to do the extra work - but is it that important?