GNU bug report logs -
#34136
guix pull -l fails on fresh user profiles
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:56:24 +0100
with message-id <87sgxnlyzr.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#34136: guix pull -l fails on fresh user profiles
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34136,
regarding guix pull -l fails on fresh user profiles
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
34136: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34136
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Switch to a new user, or simply log in as 'root' if you've never "guix
pull"ed with it, then
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
# guix pull -l
Backtrace:
8 (apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 11508e0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
705:2 7 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle…>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 6 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 11d2140>)))
In guix/ui.scm:
1644:12 5 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
829:9 4 (catch srfi-34 #<procedure 2e24be0 at guix/ui.scm:622:…> …)
829:9 3 (catch system-error #<procedure 2e24c80 at guix/script…> …)
829:9 2 (catch git-error #<procedure 2e24b40 at guix/scripts/p…> …)
829:9 1 (catch system-error #<procedure 2e28c40 at guix/script…> …)
In unknown file:
0 (raise #<condition &profile-not-found-error [profile: "…>)
ERROR: In procedure raise:
Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #<condition &profile-not-found-error [profile: "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix"] 2e1e8c0>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I think we should make `guix pull -l' return a value that can be used
meaningfully in deployment scripts. For instance, a non-zero
exit code could mean this is a fresh user profile.
Thoughts?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:
> Switch to a new user, or simply log in as 'root' if you've never "guix
> pull"ed with it, then
>
> # guix pull -l
> Backtrace:
> 8 (apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 11508e0>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 705:2 7 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle…>)
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 619:8 6 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 11d2140>)))
> In guix/ui.scm:
> 1644:12 5 (run-guix-command _ . _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 829:9 4 (catch srfi-34 #<procedure 2e24be0 at guix/ui.scm:622:…> …)
> 829:9 3 (catch system-error #<procedure 2e24c80 at guix/script…> …)
> 829:9 2 (catch git-error #<procedure 2e24b40 at guix/scripts/p…> …)
> 829:9 1 (catch system-error #<procedure 2e28c40 at guix/script…> …)
> In unknown file:
> 0 (raise #<condition &profile-not-found-error [profile: "…>)
>
> ERROR: In procedure raise:
> Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #<condition &profile-not-found-error [profile: "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix"] 2e1e8c0>
Fixed in c49b45c917eff17122aea5f7a57ae4cef02f1003. A missing import and
the wrong ‘raise’ was being used.
> I think we should make `guix pull -l' return a value that can be used
> meaningfully in deployment scripts. For instance, a non-zero
> exit code could mean this is a fresh user profile.
Yep, that’s what was intended and what happens now. :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 182 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.