GNU bug report logs -
#34136
guix pull -l fails on fresh user profiles
Previous Next
Full log
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Switch to a new user, or simply log in as 'root' if you've never "guix
pull"ed with it, then
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
# guix pull -l
Backtrace:
8 (apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 11508e0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
705:2 7 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle…>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 6 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 11d2140>)))
In guix/ui.scm:
1644:12 5 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
829:9 4 (catch srfi-34 #<procedure 2e24be0 at guix/ui.scm:622:…> …)
829:9 3 (catch system-error #<procedure 2e24c80 at guix/script…> …)
829:9 2 (catch git-error #<procedure 2e24b40 at guix/scripts/p…> …)
829:9 1 (catch system-error #<procedure 2e28c40 at guix/script…> …)
In unknown file:
0 (raise #<condition &profile-not-found-error [profile: "…>)
ERROR: In procedure raise:
Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #<condition &profile-not-found-error [profile: "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix"] 2e1e8c0>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I think we should make `guix pull -l' return a value that can be used
meaningfully in deployment scripts. For instance, a non-zero
exit code could mean this is a fresh user profile.
Thoughts?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 183 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.