GNU bug report logs - #34079
[PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
Subject: bug#34079: closed (Re: [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal:
 rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs))
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:50:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#34079: [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs)

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 34079 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
34079: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34079
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: 34079-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse ->
 sshfs)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:49:02 -0500

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 09:12:52PM +0100, swedebugia wrote:
> From 86536694d40eb42e746b55cac5caa98e28946ed1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:03:20 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Rename sshfs-fuse to sshfs.

Thanks!

> * gnu/packages/linux.scm
>   (sshfs-fuse): Mark as superseeded.
>   (sshfs): New variable.

I edited this commit message and pushed as
357b9f9d71464180ca78f58abf3a2810ccb589f3

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:12:52 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:41:59PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> I have no objections to renaming the package, though you’ll need to keep
>> a definition for “sshfs-fuse” to indicate to users that the package has
>> been renamed.
>
> Right. See the definition of 'letsencrypt' in (gnu packages tls) for an
> example of this.

Done.

[0001-gnu-Rename-sshfs-fuse-to-sshfs.patch (text/x-patch, inline)]

From 86536694d40eb42e746b55cac5caa98e28946ed1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: swedebugia <swedebugia <at> riseup.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:03:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Rename sshfs-fuse to sshfs.

* gnu/packages/linux.scm
  (sshfs-fuse): Mark as superseeded.
  (sshfs): New variable.
---
 gnu/packages/linux.scm | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 4fb85f2f3..4b70694d2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
@@ -1810,9 +1810,9 @@ UnionFS-FUSE additionally supports copy-on-write.")
                #t))))))
     (inputs `(("fuse" ,fuse-static)))))
 
-(define-public sshfs-fuse
+(define-public sshfs
   (package
-    (name "sshfs-fuse")
+    (name "sshfs")
     (version "2.10")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
@@ -1837,6 +1837,11 @@ up: on the server side there's nothing to do; on the client side mounting the
 file system is as easy as logging into the server with an SSH client.")
     (license license:gpl2+)))
 
+(define-public sshfs-fuse
+  (package (inherit sshfs)
+    (name "sshfs-fuse")
+    (properties `((superseded . ,sshfs)))))
+
 (define-public archivemount
   (package
     (name "archivemount")
-- 
2.19.2

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.