GNU bug report logs - #33870
27.0.50; xref-goto-xref not configurable

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 20:53:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #413 received at 33870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 33870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov <at> yandex.ru, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: Re: bug#33870: 27.0.50; xref-goto-xref not configurable
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 05:37:53 +0200
> From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 22:22:05 +0000
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, 33870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 9:18 PM Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Fortunately, the whole point of this bug report opened by Juri is to make
> > > this configurable. Later, we can decide on a better default, something Juri
> > > is also very much in favor of.
> >
> > With a better default such problems wouldn't happen if definitions were
> > displayed in a new split window taking space from the original window.
> 
> It's only a "problem" in your opinion :-)  I was assuming Eli also thinks it's
> a bad default, but he hasn't confirmed this yet (and like Dmitry perhaps
> we was misunderstanding the reason for the behaviour). And neither has he
> said that your proposal is better.

I thought I did express my opinions, but maybe I'm confused wrt the
question(s) you are asking.  Care to repeat them, for my benefit?




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 35 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.