GNU bug report logs - #33870
27.0.50; xref-goto-xref not configurable

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 20:53:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: 33870 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, eliz <at> gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: bug#33870: 27.0.50; xref-goto-xref not configurable
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 11:03:15 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>> We have 'display-buffer-alist' for quite some time now.
>> So please consider making this an action alist entry.
>
> Yes, it would be much better, but it never seems to reach the top of my
> todo list.
>
>> That way a user can decide whether all buffers displayed by
>> 'display-buffer' should be dedicated or only certain ones and which
>> 'dedicated' value they should get.
>
> Historically, special-display-buffer-alist always caused
> the created frames/windows to be dedicated, so
> display-buffer-mark-dedicated extends this to those windows created for
> other reasons.
>
> I haven't looked in detail, but this seems to make it less trivial to
> just add a new action alist parameter: it should default to `t` if we
> matched in display-buffer-alist but to nil if we only rely on
> display-buffer-base-action?

I'm missing you here.  An ALIST argument is equally passed to all
buffer display actions regardless of whether they are specifed by
'display-buffer-base-action' or by someone else.  It's their choice
whether they want to obey or disregard it.  The same currently holds
for 'display-buffer-mark-dedicated'.

> Also, some (all?) let-bindings of display-buffer-mark-dedicated should

I don't see any such bindings in our current code base.

> now be unnecessary (because of the features you added so bury-buffer (or
> was it quit-window?) automatically deletes the window).

This use case of dedicated windows should be no more necessary indeed.

I attach a patch of my proposed changes.  After applying that I have
no more objections against renaming 'window--display-buffer' any way
people want.

martin
[window--display-buffer.diff (text/plain, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 6 years and 35 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.