From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:52:03 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#33852 <33852@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#33852 <33852@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 26.1; unhighlight-regexp unnecessary prompt Reply-To: bug#33852 <33852@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 19:52:03 +0000 retitle 33852 26.1; unhighlight-regexp unnecessary prompt reassign 33852 emacs submitter 33852 Xiansheng Ca severity 33852 minor tag 33852 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 23 13:18:17 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2018 18:18:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gb8KO-0007mU-Of for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:18:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gb1KQ-0002bL-G3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:49:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gb1KK-0002Bs-DP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:49:45 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gb1KK-0002Bd-A0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:49:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gb1KJ-00035l-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:49:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gb1KI-0002Ai-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:49:43 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]:41888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gb1KI-0002AV-OQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:49:42 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id s22so7183797ioc.8 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 02:49:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/uRi07a6VBcurXOMExer2K4Hj6P/gzJfHGXz2oZwyxc=; b=nuugHotB0iT3r+1ohYuOItRNKMVbP8IKveVCh27kCOWcaNJlJ+VmCKvCJ9qtP+a/Hb CKp/E2d7S9teTJ9LpIzRAE4c1kpHowbOtQ2tOEzCPEiGgu5B0+Nm/16tflriHFPWiif+ PXW//qDCqi0x6I17MhKWoizyQgnChMq/F8kVE7GS3iyRNGcSAfjwdoGZQ2+dw2fb0aRr gU0/N44ZBg0biukxmDwHAbHX2cdtq9024ilt/JIrqj4/1x/ZhqXZVEt/yRgYhECFs1Kr F653+CYcQcHqwKmEAIbM6GmFNR2bAxeHLnw0n6A2sY13NdESojDnDIIWFyepWNBFR9h0 UUbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/uRi07a6VBcurXOMExer2K4Hj6P/gzJfHGXz2oZwyxc=; b=n/8A09CW5JVHVEgSxNS+fK8xXRroNd3X/uTPjmZ6YYK6VOGVAm/P3W+b9nL4XQ+aC9 4e0TX5f3qgEb7+3XLwIrcuH1YtHgm/jGk5UnVzhCzfyhkngcAa83Ke6qiVOxCAyIDjNc 7+etaa+SWduz9Ip5GgnBMDn4oxpD5EPqKxz/zC1RswY+aZGyPYRSmxI0O3UzuBRxh7KB KqNEB6pm3RAp/+3rtixT9dqGLYZjBdnVqnD6e2CVE3fQByLugxj5haY3rkrqYZIxb8c1 1mPH8N35c/urNjqEyUyBWhknfHryOmO/bmMmm3aoTZGFFOe8GHB33uhLtoOSDsYJfhtL Vb5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfD/uLh81lJaPAQL2RKpjkhV587NX9rCiQBj68ZAOMTfMB2xbrm aL/O7iYrVpO/AfPZ69d7gTRY6ICOAlxWPbHkY2b7dosS X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4RSzpEcFgp1dCCiFRwHL8sS2Xz6QF3ccZCrylWo+qrqsFG9EmHLpCWiyCxoXJ+WG+FHQUOUxk7k7CuS4iru3c= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c9c8:: with SMTP id z191mr6487299iof.13.1545562181838; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 02:49:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Xiansheng Ca Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 04:49:30 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: 26.1; unhighlight-regexp unnecessary prompt To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:18:14 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, In hi-lock-mode, after highlighting a single regular expression such as by M-s h r regexp , then unhighlighting with M-s h u, I'm prompted "Regexp to unhighlight (default regexp):", but any choice other than the default is rejected with the message "[No Match]". I would prefer not to be prompted if there is only a single acceptable choice. I believe the patch below implements this proposed behavior. Thank you for taking the time to consider this. >From c7918a6a09e91fc033a7288429ed4c466fba5e7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ca Xiansheng Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 03:30:50 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/hi-lock.el (unhighlight-regexp): Do not prompt if one choice. --- lisp/hi-lock.el | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/hi-lock.el b/lisp/hi-lock.el index 6eadd59..9377d84 100644 --- a/lisp/hi-lock.el +++ b/lisp/hi-lock.el @@ -602,13 +602,13 @@ then remove all hi-lock highlighting." ;; Infer the regexp to un-highlight based on cursor position. (let* ((defaults (or (hi-lock--regexps-at-point) (mapcar #'car hi-lock-interactive-patterns)))) - (list - (completing-read (if (null defaults) - "Regexp to unhighlight: " - (format "Regexp to unhighlight (default %s): " - (car defaults))) - hi-lock-interactive-patterns - nil t nil nil defaults)))))) + (list (if (and (consp defaults) (null (cdr defaults))) (car defaults) + (completing-read (if (null defaults) + "Regexp to unhighlight: " + (format "Regexp to unhighlight (default %s): " + (car defaults))) + hi-lock-interactive-patterns + nil t nil nil defaults))))))) (dolist (keyword (if (eq regexp t) hi-lock-interactive-patterns (list (assoc regexp hi-lock-interactive-patterns)))) (when keyword -- 2.20.1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 05 03:56:58 2019 Received: (at 33852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2019 08:56:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47223 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gfhlG-0007pt-Pu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 03:56:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gfhlF-0007pm-Mn for 33852@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 03:56:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfhlC-0000G5-3Y for 33852@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 03:56:53 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfhlC-0000Fu-0M; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 03:56:50 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1418 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gfhlB-000478-KR; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 03:56:49 -0500 Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 10:56:30 +0200 Message-Id: <83muof1o01.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Xiansheng Ca In-reply-to: (message from Xiansheng Ca on Sun, 23 Dec 2018 04:49:30 -0600) Subject: Re: bug#33852: 26.1; unhighlight-regexp unnecessary prompt References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33852 Cc: 33852@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Xiansheng Ca > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 04:49:30 -0600 > > In hi-lock-mode, after highlighting a single regular expression such > as by M-s h r regexp , then unhighlighting with M-s h u, > I'm prompted "Regexp to unhighlight (default regexp):", but any choice > other than the default is rejected with the message "[No Match]". I > would prefer not to be prompted if there is only a single acceptable > choice. > > I believe the patch below implements this proposed behavior. Thank you > for taking the time to consider this. > [...] > + (list (if (and (consp defaults) (null (cdr defaults))) (car defaults) > + (completing-read (if (null defaults) > + "Regexp to unhighlight: " > + (format "Regexp to unhighlight > (default %s): " > + (car defaults))) > + hi-lock-interactive-patterns > + nil t nil nil defaults))))))) What happens if the command is invoked with point on a portion of text that is highlighted by a hi-lock regexp? Wouldn't the command then silently unhighlight only that regexp, and won't allow the user to specify any other regexp? IOW, if the list of completions has only one element (btw, this fact can be more elegantly established by calling 'length'), it does not necessarily mean that there's only one hi-lock regexp defined in the buffer. Should we consider that as well? Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 13 08:15:07 2020 Received: (at 33852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2020 12:15:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47335 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6C8Q-0006iB-ND for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:15:07 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f172.google.com ([209.85.219.172]:35607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6C8L-0006gn-Sn for 33852@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:15:02 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f172.google.com with SMTP id y134so3197465yby.2 for <33852@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:15:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TSGGB6e2vghx3oZTSLgDpiR2RrhUGPKbmw9iy1C6/Z8=; b=pSbedULxTZqbv4CynvuyEEe+h6/ggruC59MxyS4Pn9ZWUA2ul4LBlZMkNTuKkKckNc q5m/2dKQJtxeV5Kp1LnhypERMBvRZym81B8Z17OefdDd3Si2LD+/1VKk0TtUazNqtAQ7 ZIjSLjDO3DAKR/pj5pdfOrbjr+RSdK/hjvhWR7GuIIrsY+RLr38RdN0TPIttCANXjrDN 8IbMp2wI5pbGcjR1Bw4r0VN3aMd0eAhC6q1VGPH/O8cKutaNqW8LGmHtHJPHWQKgWBqq uRcfS9YkGolVvemSHwhuMDdMndb5AflIU0PI/qfKM3c8MWkAbN4CaMHVWE+b5V1lxt2Q tSIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BeBAxv/JZFVb/4eFLRIyMb6n17W8BOR6yWZ8SRhVhn7hbKZw1 c7ZRRTFy6RGbj5Ymqudl4TfdvC6fzC/F4f0Tz8E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyT3z8pEgKhmAfSnZc6nywB/W7aj37ITnupodoSWJdEJYoI+o459rwDoS26DVDdei28vNfanuTtbgn5ECNJ/MA= X-Received: by 2002:a25:7007:: with SMTP id l7mr5971204ybc.85.1597320896543; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:14:56 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <83muof1o01.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 05 Jan 2019 10:56:30 +0200") References: <83muof1o01.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:14:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#33852: 26.1; unhighlight-regexp unnecessary prompt To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33852 Cc: 33852@debbugs.gnu.org, Xiansheng Ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Xiansheng Ca >> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 04:49:30 -0600 >> >> In hi-lock-mode, after highlighting a single regular expression such >> as by M-s h r regexp , then unhighlighting with M-s h u, >> I'm prompted "Regexp to unhighlight (default regexp):", but any choice >> other than the default is rejected with the message "[No Match]". I >> would prefer not to be prompted if there is only a single acceptable >> choice. >> >> I believe the patch below implements this proposed behavior. Thank you >> for taking the time to consider this. >> [...] >> + (list (if (and (consp defaults) (null (cdr defaults))) (car defaults) >> + (completing-read (if (null defaults) >> + "Regexp to unhighlight: " >> + (format "Regexp to unhighlight >> (default %s): " >> + (car defaults))) >> + hi-lock-interactive-patterns >> + nil t nil nil defaults))))))) > > What happens if the command is invoked with point on a portion of text > that is highlighted by a hi-lock regexp? Wouldn't the command then > silently unhighlight only that regexp, and won't allow the user to > specify any other regexp? > > IOW, if the list of completions has only one element (btw, this fact > can be more elegantly established by calling 'length'), it does not > necessarily mean that there's only one hi-lock regexp defined in the > buffer. Should we consider that as well? That was 1.5 years ago. Any updates here? Xiansheng Ca, did you have a chance to look at Eli's questions above? Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 27 08:49:45 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2020 12:49:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42059 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBHLd-0005NS-Mx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:49:45 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f175.google.com ([209.85.219.175]:44304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBHLc-0005NF-Jg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:49:44 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f175.google.com with SMTP id i10so2874306ybt.11 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:49:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jxXM2VGinVSY/pl3YtVeVHgkR9c4e4Oct2dDh4gJmw0=; b=uazEPVdxHjNB5NvBaYVzgHipi1C4lG7koOGDmYT6AlEAKmmqkEh3AZaNnEicgBrm// 4kcMamhPfPsEe+SJEENLp+B8dE6QBM7L+Fvn532wKH5LtsRJj4KEBksq+wvJrSG3MhbB dFKAhT/fmv7ExBsK7I0P5+XnN9hjGxBSx/2OVuCp4Scri/QFCw1l/tacOBAtgt9BOhYB a4DOaN6oOEOjQdryacfXazXcYafNdEmlssoCAxXjokRYEFGE1ntVH5lJ7cARAXmskZvZ GOT4TECQjPe1LCILfEJ3hTVIGrAx0otEiiw08S76EbqZmoB6nrU06SB6RqZ8NyIGY2mQ uQAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326q3yJ42g3LkHYSIceFfTMVtv5LNU+V72QgcyDFD6/0F+DwzPE nbo3LADzPF2qFq/DrXJsSVZ5lKe9SjTNyhHY2drPy9W79io= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRUwBmTi3qm7/esvUHMv3h/Bh5tKzjBTws4579EhD+1neXTW3h8YSa4p82OhUw4jHzsnNFPp/XZgIMXVWgyKw= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:410:: with SMTP id m16mr27338109ybp.309.1598532578871; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:49:38 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:49:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 33852 + moreinfo thanks Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.175 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 33852 + moreinfo thanks Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.175 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines tags 33852 + moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 30 21:57:55 2020 Received: (at 33852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2020 01:57:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33514 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNnr0-0006Ke-Qo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:57:55 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNnqz-0006KQ-Do for 33852@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:57:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=en7xtGDoa7o3bmDEXCB8Jdos++rXsboWJmC8twFjF4g=; b=k2Ac7nx+1H3UY0YdezVqOHjxJH gQpMgb23li68BCxvcCBEiVnv/u1NkNmEDi4SwQmkieWbXnrnBlsb+2am9PUaXNkFJIzUB8NzeMq8D QGNJwH40LGNdmXkPAAIwS2A6te5Ihq81I4N6+fk8hx+cOy7u6qtuqCZY7PO5I6WTMc/k=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNnqp-0000WQ-L2; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 03:57:47 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#33852: 26.1; unhighlight-regexp unnecessary prompt References: <83muof1o01.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Seigen Ono's _Comme des =?utf-8?Q?Gar=C3=A7ons=5F=3A?= "Something to Hold On To" Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 03:57:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:14:56 -0700") Message-ID: <87k0wavhbd.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > That was 1.5 years ago. Any updates here? Xiansheng Ca, did you have a > chance to look at Eli's questions above? There was no followup here, so it seems unlikely that there'll be further progress made in this bug report, and I'm closing it. If progress can be made, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33852 Cc: 33852@debbugs.gnu.org, Xiansheng Ca , Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > That was 1.5 years ago. Any updates here? Xiansheng Ca, did you have a > chance to look at Eli's questions above? There was no followup here, so it seems unlikely that there'll be further progress made in this bug report, and I'm closing it. If progress can be made, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen the report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 30 21:58:14 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2020 01:58:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNnr9-0006LT-4P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:58:14 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNnr7-0006Km-H8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:58:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=72L7xzQcQI8ukcDVScFdMJWVW5JyKYDvKQS7LR6HDug=; b=HWEFjO3wvBUvohcKeNYHCRvKOW +7saoM5chvi4wGNY7d3GdICq5/Ap5UXYjI05NePwc1em5HQU7uEW6aBD/rvpoW/oleNid5TisUTS9 k3NliMcbxr7Ta7JcloLz+k6jqTEAHzQWYXrPVgJ+0QzMnKXVru1jCZZIVslYbOSct5uc=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNnqz-0000Wc-Mu for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 03:57:55 +0200 Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 03:57:52 +0200 Message-Id: <87imbuvhb3.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #33852 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 33852 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 33852 quit From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:52:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator