GNU bug report logs - #33844
Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: swedebugia <at> riseup.net

Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 08:47:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#33844: closed (Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 00:05:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:03:42 +0100
with message-id <86sg82slup.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33844,
regarding Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
33844: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33844
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: swedebugia <at> riseup.net
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:46:21 -0800
Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats.

-- 
Cheers 
Swedebugia


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: swedebugia <at> riseup.net, 33844-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:03:42 +0100
On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 at 17:27, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear,
>
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> wrote:
>> zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch.
>
> The packages: …
>
>>>  - rapicorn
>>>  - ganeti
>>>  - manuskript
>>>  - emacs-org-web-tools
>>>  - emacs-ox-pandoc
>>>  - ruby-pandoc-ruby
>
> … now uses ’pandoc’ instead of ’ghc-pandoc’, see:
>
> c22c6de453 gnu: rapicorn: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> 885332832c gnu: ganeti: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> 5dc5a3116b gnu: manuskript: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> 991c61678b gnu: emacs-org-web-tools: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> d37279ee1e gnu: emacs-ox-pandoc: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
> 8cc8e584ab gnu: ruby-pandoc-ruby: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc.
>
>
>> If these packages only use the “pandoc” executable they should use the
>> “pandoc” package instead of “ghc-pandoc”.  “ghc-pandoc” is only meant
>> for Haskell packages that use Pandoc as a library.  This is a much rarer
>> case, so we can assume that most packages should use “pandoc” instead of
>> “ghc-pandoc”.
>
> The only non-Haskell package remaining is ’gnu/packages/mail.scm
> (muchsync)’.  Once this package is done (see #43848 [1]), we should be
> able to close this bug, I guess.

Done by <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43848#1>, see 8514dfdee6.

Closing.

Thanks,
simon


This bug report was last modified 4 years and 150 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.