From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 23 03:46:42 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2018 08:46:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gazPF-0007w8-UJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 03:46:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58467) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gazPD-0007vt-Ap for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 03:46:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gazP7-0004ZU-CX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 03:46:33 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gazP7-0004ZO-9d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 03:46:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gazP6-0001Bd-Af for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 03:46:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gazP1-0004Uf-80 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 03:46:32 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:37164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gazOz-0004SB-DW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 03:46:27 -0500 Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (cotinga-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5FC1A04BF for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:46:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1545554781; bh=6vNB3ZlPTZfrqhPVUHiwn9UbdHhdCLOHhasiUzy94iM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=puARlJzO7wOPvHsIviJE4KJyzpskC7GYkSjmAz9GCZrTjOWREJ/TjiQJQYIQu0ayb gBNjbeNls3IGEa/yos4/mOHSXFOIhZ/Fornc+BQZUFWg6G4Y3T1N4mDZX2KM0uzQn8 cO4vLw4LF7h8osj6GDgPlg6F6CVoMOpxWl64wZ+c= X-Riseup-User-ID: 5F87DC6C0DA382BFC66690F2E4D140C77896D491D95F46917293767A12AFCBD2 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cotinga.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 760B51056DB for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:46:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:46:21 -0800 From: swedebugia@riseup.net To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc Message-ID: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. -- Cheers Swedebugia From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 05:06:49 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2020 10:06:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6taX-00025h-MH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:06:49 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:32879) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6taS-00025Q-8p for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:06:44 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.129.147 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1315-147.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.129.147]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8265020013; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:06:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: swedebugia@riseup.net Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:06:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> (swedebugia@riseup.net's message of "Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:46:21 -0800") Message-ID: <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: swedebugia@riseup.net writes: > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. I agree. What do other people think? Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.200 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.8 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: swedebugia@riseup.net writes: > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. I agree. What do other people think? Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: riseup.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.200 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.8 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable swedebugia@riseup.net writes: > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. I agree. What do other people think? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl5WQyYACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH/jtgf+JprorQh9b1COXDW+J5TvgauJXv6tZULqxL/tqBxNs3nt9zLVUZEtTrXv PslBKNQ6b6/9MjXs2raGVaNAQOD12mDYX+GBFDYQYBaCIkbGo+7rDir2QZAf4tWT VEdi+N6mQWhUlu1VWzdjHfgZqHZCU3VVpb3rz3VTL8TRT7lPdaqiw5nERLBJBvyi MMG1H1B9gkJMr+sOKffK+C2sjUEZRLpCeKxT+VHvgJQ8bNAyHIHDl15YxeEr4Mla 2kzWBnoDUzxLnE51lyqcULspIId9kEalPm3eVY3E7cXS0MuSSRci8u5Nep+mg632 M0DtB3OkFK+9AnEOhCoDcJcGcSR5Uw== =Qh/9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 05:23:08 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2020 10:23:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56436 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6tqK-0002V9-6T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:23:08 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:33842) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6tqD-0002UQ-Vc for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:23:03 -0500 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id de54538d; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:cc :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=GOdIJZwKi5q162Zy6wfzkH J6v7XI0tAE0RZYv2vUCqw=; b=kHWGpiBWpWxuuQ7nlkXIo9HGAylrCHHSHg7Lft aPLD8Q8d2AYh9xAbKl73qyfvumGd7UAimS+op59dNrUc6iRKFc7eTHB79ueYK9pA L3+3ySmFpAZ26RPu97QJiXiVRgl0RZDPKS1/NjHtdx/dkR3KpC3KQRhQTxJuBKt8 kAdyOdWj4d8IdRNUqtv2qjjphPcnzqKsF1Hf5axO5OwAX/lDjsheo6DSK+iKE1eP laKgURc5t0KiBcdqrnH0gESTZ+ZUZNtkcg6WNGUKwuJn8plW5jgwjRoEDcSByo1L 0wHbNPXwjrpv9MbHXosnnjldjxTrWsivCaRh9MjgUyMo5IHw== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 51efb4e6 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc Message-ID: <875zftk5q2.fsf@nckx> References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> In-reply-to: <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:23:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pierre Neidhardt =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. > > I agree. What do other people think? [Thumbs-up emoji] Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl5WRxcACgkQ2Imw8BjF STyl0BAAkvUyfxV22onlouSKZuA3KAuBVZMuHNuPLMQIP+gU6AhkJTTTgJzqFLV3 ykb40K0hpT/U1nEt15p6XoWlJxuP9Sw2oVH+12Sfz0SjZ7HyqtYlR4t4QId38HkG mjZcKyb3eD/STu5iDu0V8s3MbCERJ5mN6H+F8wcq5BiYYFK+hOh91ZJgb0JqVSwj GX3WsdPlbbkgWVtLD1wzmCWEKUiHekUljJgTNzKnAZRxXi9DJq28tV6omHevWPUF x37YQXa3nX37d0Ffdx403c4oh4erYpWXF09X1tjDO9y18nqFZNLWEyGXJBkZSqiZ SeXaaH5n/9WXlmY5gRKAszt/ZiRcLcBMHojjpSTPFWjlTUnNjk+ss2UmL0H7UMGF zpkEIW9QjYiHH4RpVtzVb4MtJqxxwkLC/U+xJucZq30mS82rsnbGUg0hVInOBsDg G4j2FSXQWhCHscrvkyBgLFQQQp3wm2LgsAcBW0kmvmpA//qcVT6oXsomnJl/mFm9 Wt5EXz75sPcLvIKVdR07h03uNhbmGSa9QsfZWAzUCQ4qEMJaIbi8FuhLVhCHlBuq 0tDOHU+HzM3pGue7gEmY2XYvDkMeEpNKWRwC7VA0SBn+s+QFeZ672JZQOMH+nxGF amVI424wPhiap2LDKYw2XzL5XlW0ZqbsmluM3DPsizuSN35fUME= =SKBq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 05:24:02 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2020 10:24:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6trC-0002WW-6y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:24:02 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:38242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6tr7-0002W2-B3 for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:23:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.13.108]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1ACFE400CC; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:23:14 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc Message-ID: <20200226102314.GE12956@E5400> References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y1L3PTX8QE8cb2T+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, guix-devel@gnu.org, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --Y1L3PTX8QE8cb2T+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:06:30AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > swedebugia@riseup.net writes: >=20 > > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. >=20 > I agree. What do other people think? This is language specific, but like other language-specific packages this is a package people would specifically search for as 'pandoc' and I agree, it should be renamed. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Y1L3PTX8QE8cb2T+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl5WRw8ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1HXTBAAqwMY8iVqOBut84i3co6oZJIDBxhpmf5LaF74igqNEhyPXezi/S8sL0EJ 4ZLELIqgcUYqS9nIN9c46kuXtXZFZgYUrQj9pxJdVALWJtJKrJuLRbwj4ZXpgFQJ 8fjx+x58vbUAgAxB3mbK1FIuVcvuosAFOcLMnYMWUlS02NHPKwnrrke0VbiaMG3a AYQ3zNkZiuVIYrdxyNJNHA8r27lN/yMvypQjGrOdboi0Qg8OS6Myb1p6rWUTHe0W vHibaXgmlCOW72YqSHx+Ygst3MMxWI7qbHIdsJ9y6M18V9T/Aq11n/pFyNfBgwSl nSNBQ/a9kOHKHfoJJa1w4obDLTMtRW5sVI3GcAcJlf3/idTfxhhETNnwLwvI1fB9 i9GegMylTwVpx6JUQWNViyRJ0sUNKVYC/V4NvxO4SHcYJhWlxzAdt3YdnJOT8p9F a/yzGW37uzWU+TTzVr9wNw0UA9DLJofvcVVwe/qjKr2CRtQngjBkOd7C/slaHuTw edWDyxdrq74oFjV7RJOHiRNEcHI/WEMvElM1Z3aPcw+ddU8RF3rTVnyiJGJw7A0S jCBNtAzs1bIBH3H7rXmu25BMON2pzBNdHMRAqyKeXmRF4DkvoWk3v8V/OXxzIrTW WxpI3UsqE5f6iMuXY+5bLSv4X19NucyIZpT3qDIwVkBY/zmme0E= =1G+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y1L3PTX8QE8cb2T+-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 06:57:29 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2020 11:57:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6vJg-0004wW-Rq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:57:29 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21105) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6vJf-0004wN-Cr for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:57:28 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582718235; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=R3abn+zAcZ4MXGlTQAzr3hvuCyg/LwwtULNP4JqaKmgibWNbbSFLWrScpGF6t3IbVlXQjvvb9ve3f0oM0XQVD34MCjcyHEaDr56mQDzO4qcBheTOzY3i3wU7L/Ysnuu9EX9wshIZdZkn9S9H83l3SnNdZm6ZKuv6edxzUoATXIg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1582718235; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=RyzH2nlm5mzs4KryEgvnePpKo6yP3TmLfhavzqs98Gk=; b=M74e6WPOsPbY0f3RlRgzpiNyKHXHw2XfJMSQGAfvIQ5SosguG1/pREyQ0BnLlEN94XlUdSz5/cGbGRn7SSgaNviqNvSftO+n9KqGv7QUrtwHv4snJVGvBGNhjY5TR4005xFO+i+5wzPftZyJ3ZWH65My3qIXgaWudi5o2Ljot0g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1582718235; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=RyzH2nlm5mzs4KryEgvnePpKo6yP3TmLfhavzqs98Gk=; b=EwbVlgghxySBs0j7EGZ2PDBAmpZVuNOJIHM0+B26ieRbszzcgxvX/Too1WjbJHgC 0rfD3Bjp+OyUtrWRJjPOe717nPcp3MeoY8iYL9Q3KKaFq4wG3Hv7pZA6XtpIzQP+fkJ kDLwnWAGew53Y9wc4cTNnvz/c3LpOtX8iWEk5UXU= Received: from localhost (p4FD5AEC7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.213.174.199]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1582718225723343.1582048843436; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 03:57:05 -0800 (PST) References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc In-reply-to: <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:57:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pierre Neidhardt writes: > swedebugia@riseup.net writes: > >> Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. > > I agree. What do other people think? I agree. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: riseup.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [136.143.188.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.8 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) Pierre Neidhardt writes: > swedebugia@riseup.net writes: > >> Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. > > I agree. What do other people think? I agree. We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. -- Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 07:18:02 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2020 12:18:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6vda-0005Ug-J2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:18:02 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:32831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6vdZ-0005UA-4B for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:18:01 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.129.147 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1315-147.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.129.147]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 237AB20002; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:17:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc In-Reply-To: <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:17:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87wo898rv3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ricardo Wurmus writes: > We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. Oops! I'll resend patch 39798. Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: elephly.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.200 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.9 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ricardo Wurmus writes: > We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. Oops! I'll resend patch 39798. Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: elephly.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.200 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.9 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: > We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. Oops! I'll resend patch 39798. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl5WYfAACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH8CcQf/f8ufge0/kPXlhJSuGJi2EKkTRsxlevBsUjFeXzj7ejTngk7VPTkjxB/s HB6qrF16ufNOk0M3hGrbwwI6JU5U9tVbKXPOC0nPGQdYrLFiso7mGd5VfWRa98Te FZL/bjG6c74wEKjAnTBv0kNyzEz1VkL/UPfkvASv0FnsTrG3j6ytidjG9CcKmFt3 yY9twLDzXNKQItZpA3z4GJ4LK6ZOYW29cVRSJdxW7XHV9Uaz6tgb2xdNjmR/9yTa pppzmIm0qs5I9DrMGbuWb8HwDjpAr2cAvIlLh51Drv7C2TKqvdOALYYkEvL1eam2 TEITje4Iw884byNp70P+LsSIdBGBhg== =bOPh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 07:52:31 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2020 12:52:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56562 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6wAx-0008J0-2H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:52:31 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:49379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6wAv-0008Ij-D1 for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 07:52:29 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.129.147 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1315-147.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.129.147]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66C39C0002; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:52:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc In-Reply-To: <87wo898rv3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> <87wo898rv3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:52:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87tv3d8q9m.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Done. See patch patch 39798. -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.198 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.9 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Done. See patch patch 39798. -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: ambrevar.xyz] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.198 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.9 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Done. See patch patch 39798. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl5WagUACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH/xdggAnUPuLLMeHS+7YbRskMNusWIn714FB90jicp6bBMjddpbMKnx6wynhfQt kPIt3oDgsRfIfcOWv2CwEVAyE7DUvqVcN5U1OxcTfyjofVGDnrOHFPAOtUteBVA2 yQJ5Ei2HLC03PIwjerZcdHIo/eP9QCpbQn3b1v8Ue8ZUsJRE8etkKEEmezV1baeX T4JpDnDZfEv2DT5L4dgDkecQ0OHQPxEQ3U8LMQdP5v9TUikAiaPWNGulY3Rqpp96 j5bxexPoVdPZvsmx5cwtPv6uLT4pdE0vqgBM9oQnGMUjY6io82tKElBdTH1FtElH Pe3cmSFPiMtHxuKJoMYB/syki+UENw== =b4Xu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 26 20:23:39 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2020 01:23:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j77tr-0007CU-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:23:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36418) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j77tp-0007CF-SA for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:23:38 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j77tj-0006wW-QB; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:23:31 -0500 Received: from localhost ([::1]:51300 helo=mikegerwitz-pc.gerwitz.local) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j77tj-00015P-FB; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:23:31 -0500 From: Mike Gerwitz To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc In-Reply-To: <20200226102314.GE12956@E5400> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:23:14 +0200") Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:23:00 -0500 Message-ID: <87pne0q0wb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200226102314.GE12956@E5400> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) OpenPGP: id=D6E9B930028A6C38F43B2388FEF635745E6F6D05 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:23:14 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:06:30AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: >> swedebugia@riseup.net writes: >>=20 >> > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. >>=20 >> I agree. What do other people think? > > This is language specific, but like other language-specific packages > this is a package people would specifically search for as 'pandoc' and I > agree, it should be renamed. Ah, for the record, I had searched for pandoc using `guix package -s pandoc` in the past and didn't find what I was looking for, and so fell back to a Debian system. It turns out what I wanted was ghc-pandoc after all. But if I would have put a little bit more effort into looking, perhaps I would have figured that out; I was in a hurry. Thanks for making this change! =2D-=20 Mike Gerwitz Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJeVxoIAAoJEIyRe39dxRuid10QAIE0j4vhLt7B1/mKgfvJj4OI /5eOFAeEdX2uFW1excxQczOa7H5cKmimH/Xb9+i3b/v2pnlNpk83tHDd0zvzOzii bPWm3M9rvjxJCxBS0qxU26gQjszWnxFgRhpCjc76yT+KnkNGD60s4h/VK8UVZsCW kaUurQkRxdX5UrqH0YDxfv9kAUsYrqdnrayaB3PQcnmSbzVpP/+3OxN6WCRlCKYu f/OYtFz9t1366joOnIoViRsAb+7vD2UlTWUkwlyznrqHw400D2sWL9J9Mc9pBduJ zUs2DZe/7/46dIIcMsj/vzJOcHZRFbE3uwDB4sVZayWbqegwAndUkivzVdRRBNOV +MGRrnog/1BpGfEev9jDKaEE9SEvMHFrrMXf8SfZkHwbtaalmEVSdwTE+un2IF5h xTWEvUiPKS9URT3GBa4NBd4YU3VzkMBlUkcnTx0w9Ed5oky8H/z6wraTwNSKyjlF hpVXqSdgAbyVn3ECpScxifux9uac+u0ZJr0bdJrRaxzhzCEj7mGD3HYJArPdhCkW kCgDFYpUMRM/Q0PoX1RGh1H0ItCpoQAIm0TxehSwSU2v8UXiVUCQ19P57phSWhVb WCuM05oohDyujBMbLn1YYi5n9UXmAvD4+4sKP+w0k7Aduc+FBSAxBc5fVptyXeaI 3SyMZr02xKkBTrINOF3p =LBpP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 27 08:10:34 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2020 13:10:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Ivy-0000sv-8V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:10:34 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:34689) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Ivw-0000sh-3K for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:10:32 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 11so3039934qkd.1 for <33844@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:10:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q7XinlM2AJlSDrspgLJpZ1jjLFTqduiLwTxqqBJYyTc=; b=NXZWn4bMu+RctGac1JO9gbUID0/Mw8xz9RIcjHFR9q7j9oZcGtGkUgSHabRvLAYYvK YZ3Baswi4sKPiE/4xVYl/0OC9tp0ur1pD11vm5pIRzCII7txXPAiAsfKUBbJ/lXga3wc 2qYsj5Yjm2DyiTsDVPWQcWnnIo4xnzcRNlS9JJvHAMIQTnPBQTU89ljOByFtE4C1Q8if fJM7HJsfRxHzvaLVDCKlXUXZaHhY1wnkzETAeh1Z4soNrtUjKSjgtlH5Tjl5bstVB8KR w4lDSMoV/vfh9DF5Holurpt2V8znDgXfjIpy7nHCoJQyu5/Oklb1kcnDEaOvgEvan2TI nJ+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q7XinlM2AJlSDrspgLJpZ1jjLFTqduiLwTxqqBJYyTc=; b=dLHmBoUC7kOlLRSmOPqWl0TkmZzS1JfcTCwxibETdWBu4z6FxSRw+ZKYYXFu1XUMRt JEjFMGN3Wp7oEagzUV7fBZ0PxxAM8+DZkMDywjVxfXlrkh9+Hbd20ldwdP/+hEX+gPiq VXItJ9iqeCU3dRuYQc1xyx0+bAUMENAo3JrJsSO+vLKij5hoPjIM775OZw3SlvqZP1nC OPq74g79TwcygIfuSk2rm9qKmboDlbNId4YRPdMHW9XnOgx4Ja65bUD35MgtZf0gNnCX 7Bvpr1JdKtWMx0RtJycKVJ08OnLcR2i5ahKVK9DMXbHY00U3HVgFENpHBCrpwjy/hAG9 gZ7w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUwWJZmKgK8oS7robC+PSBd/WBY88v5W6uROXGoey1vx7KUD6TS A39sWBUeF+ggxg1IQ4aCB7cuGt8JgSBQ+xZfH58= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6R1WODbk8FaBQ9WnoEl7qvtTZrfSAdv6SQerg8ffWeH9G+p/njPuvVoeBHpa/9aUhA08C75QgmzdYgfUZj28= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1092:: with SMTP id g18mr5170051qkk.80.1582809026510; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:10:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200226102314.GE12956@E5400> <87pne0q0wb.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87pne0q0wb.fsf@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:10:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc To: Mike Gerwitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: Guix Devel , 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Mike, On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 02:23, Mike Gerwitz wrote: > Ah, for the record, I had searched for pandoc using `guix package -s > pandoc` in the past and didn't find what I was looking for, and so fell > back to a Debian system. It turns out what I wanted was ghc-pandoc > after all. Thank you for pointing the issue. My remark is *not* about the rename which seems fine. For the very same reason than the "git-annex" software is named 'git-annex' and not 'ghc-git-annex'. Well, your comment is pointing: a) that the description is badly written and b) the 'relevance' score is too rough. The command "guix search pandoc" returns as the highest ranked package: ghc-pandoc-citeproc with the relevance score of 17. The package of interest 'ghc-pandoc' appears at the 6th position with a relevance score of 8. (And after emacs-pandoc-mode, ghc-pandoc-types, emacs-ox-pandoc and python-pandocfilters; well less relevant packages, IMO.) Why? Because the number of occurrences of the term 'pandoc' in synopsis+description+name. ghc-pandoc-citeproc: 1+5+1 ghc-pandoc: 0+2+1 To be precise, the score uses weights and so it reads: ghc-pandoc-citeproc: 3*1 + 2*5 + 4*1 = 17 ghc-pandoc: 3*0 + 2*2 + 4*1 = 8 And the rename bumps the score because there is an additional weight (5) for exact match (which normally happens only for the 'name' field). ghc-pandoc-citeproc: 3*1 + 2*5 + 4*1 = 17 pandoc: 3*0 + 2*2 + 4*1*5 = 24 It apparently fixes the issue and now the package named 'pandoc' will show up first. But it is an artefact because it is easy* to find other weights that invalidate this expected ranking; and the current weights are a working rule of thumbs but not deeply thought, AFAIK. *For example instead of 5, let choose 2, then the score becomes: 3*0+2*2+4*1*2=12 which is less than 17. Well, not so easy because 2 is the same as 'description' and it seems less natural; i.e., it appears more natural to have a high weight for an exact match. But the point is: it is possible to find another working rule of thumb which will not return the expected result for all the packages. The real problem is not the non-obvious name (ghc-pandoc instead of simply pandoc) but it is: a) some descriptions are badly written and b) the 'relevance' scoring function is not enough "smart" to detect them. All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 00:04:09 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2020 05:04:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60536 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Xon-0000RZ-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:04:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60336) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Xol-0000RH-NN for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:04:08 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Xof-0001J2-QH; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:04:02 -0500 Received: from localhost ([::1]:46226 helo=mikegerwitz-pc.gerwitz.local) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Xof-0001o6-Ch; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:04:01 -0500 From: Mike Gerwitz To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:10:15 +0100") Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:03:06 -0500 Message-ID: <87wo87e22d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200226102314.GE12956@E5400> <87pne0q0wb.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) OpenPGP: id=D6E9B930028A6C38F43B2388FEF635745E6F6D05 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: Guix Devel , 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 14:10:15 +0100, zimoun wrote: > Well, your comment is pointing: a) that the description is badly > written and b) the 'relevance' score is too rough. [...] > The real problem is not the non-obvious name (ghc-pandoc instead of > simply pandoc) but it is: a) some descriptions are badly written and > b) the 'relevance' scoring function is not enough "smart" to detect > them. Thank you for taking the time to explain this. =2D-=20 Mike Gerwitz --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJeWJ8KAAoJEIyRe39dxRuilUYP/02KD5oQ7q5/fdh2cffwIPzU wBxvrHvF8Jc3Z0oRhlD+E4rKtzicTjxU3Uc6dG3v+TFH4GMu9+gXhXj5Qtyhkdcf 4oDZBoQYAnZ/9rQkJg5NvHDLa8meaSOTYo2UQ+EtKheBXLumNFOI2NgQOlsPPqdq DxUegeW89qjBw6Q39l1/cCeOemIyHFmr0YjBf046SmBbYeYwYqmeaidpBGtkyHJ7 AsXZBggZghbn7KCB8jEWVp4V9Xy2la3zMNNI/3cgTal492NqPDQI9v706lGoeoFR kSPvMoD0JijDZ1N2sl0VenOZnaJPyCh0NsP3nXx5j/oY2De653bmdvATp6oXK2w5 U//Q/EgrKJaOgc5kc2KYCsjlM1CGrZRajo7sEFoW4zcMFZbRZ34NV0nNqWOqEtWN GNLIjljMehWmsZnlBJqAsAjMz1CIENkv7o0zF4a8RuA4t0lvGqvEpnohHIgNq6gB HpvBcZX8oVqjmCBK4URFXsUwf2tJlPoop5u7PIlnqoAg6CUQ3CcRoVSV2+/fvxlf u9ZEhdwa3xXi2METFlSxNKWwij6WWljCDhup1bpofleN/8B0ZkncWEIJX2ogj6WG ctWx+k9EdgmAgnos+gci7upH4nGLoQrpXMtbZuRWv6l6bl64damYKaT1kcNeYxVa HEf1Z4fx79RL6E0UrRyq =AcLV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 09 12:08:38 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2020 16:08:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG2eE-0006YA-KE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:08:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:33903) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG2eA-0006XQ-QJ for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:08:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id t10so3597857wrv.1 for <33844@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 09:08:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lWHLSPfNC2oQPJfWqKlaNHx5B4Dd2mUci2FBhLBiVKI=; b=Mqdq78h5gqZ02vr6bAhcM6JKoenqNyUb4ATtsW18QkSulA+zv9GZD5YN7Ss+o87Rjt TkjHXIlElzH7bGVLl1+G1svuNLRZplRCEN8pDBky8t0/w0vXwD7YPqi7XPkY6ZPFJcEn 0DyN5CBRByahvBwT/ko9F6L9k3Vj62IDN7EEN8Fii9GMNzoi15W4s4cOYN0zoNloVZi4 /WAhecAgMDHXv1bpMDDQSSrDb4rjBkUBFfdE5G/ZNvRg9gC57ANpe/uIYOZxPGo7QatZ Qsb1j08oQ2yw9klgeTvelRr8vVJhawEzqA73fWYhdwk0PLL5XjJILSoFOntKjGgHlZdk FWUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lWHLSPfNC2oQPJfWqKlaNHx5B4Dd2mUci2FBhLBiVKI=; b=q8p4gK45V8J85VeQp3zAPfyYUzZtGW6Vj8mokU/PnXRnAoT1yiu6eCiAPEn4TDG98X aBaaY4r18I4j7sHndS+BOYXmRoiTBdrrk7LzZH3M3tRxBaiVxf7EAJ65SKljUN9w++9c E1V10LBpy3tV2XgWkBiPCQKDuoe8UE+kmByiBu4a5UaGLvybYXlYmKOvcbG6yu3AqeTh oCT0hwkMUb0sM0dox4ghi5KODN6HuJbAeARTQLRmwsfjWh60Y+VcywNOaFfgieHjUvC7 3m6aOI1FMtk7R8L3af/s2o3DX8uV+JbV2SrWPDed1Oq4GkbtE9RRYnYnss4X5euxoc4B 6Jcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RfCSm6BEcGkkdAJPo8djV2VjrV0iYcAc1Akp80JtQZ10n78jn HGS1djB7o5ZwpubACukDB5M+queekkQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3TNjX0rH2bZ1fFuU+M7NCrQv6/MILfEIk/fDSj5iGshNyHM0K/VuuSXgF/f4ecOJXTpDNRQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:100c:: with SMTP id a12mr4881156wrx.115.1599667708756; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 09:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m3sm5518138wme.31.2020.09.09.09.08.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 09:08:28 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:08:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:57:02 +0100") Message-ID: <871rjbue4k.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 12:57, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. Commit d4e4a3824d380e576b56a74aa714db205fcc59a4 adds pandoc. The packages: - ruby-pandoc-ruby - rapicorn - ganeti - manuskript - emacs-org-web-tools - emacs-ox-pandoc do not use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc; I do not know if it matters or if they need to also switch. More all Haskell packages in haskell-xyz.scm. Since ghc-pandoc is still here and even pandoc inherits from it, I propose to close. All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 09 12:10:33 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2020 16:10:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33048 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG2g5-0006bd-89 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:10:33 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21172) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG2g3-0006bL-7y for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:10:32 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599667828; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=G1HLBWB4UL2Qr+MRS/2+6xrZTljksVdSYhHE4IvAUJNv4It03ACiNJWcLdQIouJ7z2Cx6OGPW8VYhTwHaK9DboMiSBaI+BUUEXzGXRxMk7y3J1PpUp4nfMsKS9XeBM6eC4rUqolkCllaRTzQ12WrIepmL2G6QiCTf/MyRDZQHwU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1599667828; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=KOX3arDH+K5khFQn/pZOWGGYc4l+w5Zz6d8r2lERlEA=; b=gA331wkzkE5B5IkBf4ewjXZo0gTByRZr52r2bwdCHSedzW+KmzcZmMttdovy/PAn3lZE9cTibs5LP8qfTPrTf2XN2VfkKAL48twkqJjz5cpzRIWxkUpUP9GmVvZVE5WFa8lvdT7Wl70X9rcgREG6IjQVEEWTFSmf1goIGZ/bOgg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1599667828; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=KOX3arDH+K5khFQn/pZOWGGYc4l+w5Zz6d8r2lERlEA=; b=HoIm7gt83nPUSrxFazGmcogAZfsWfwNEqjKuBhWvLIt0A4IggtTp6xBUoSDulLGy 8TbPqdx/DJKHrLNlU/dgVHLV3hm3rl3g6347mUTQdU94VOJF6pxSgTU6b+fdBqdayNp RBrII6ZhFOzmSsPosP0gmZSqyBJJifMdB6uqr880= Received: from localhost (p54ad4cd7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.76.215]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1599667826377272.38762806535294; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:10:26 -0700 (PDT) References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> <871rjbue4k.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc In-reply-to: <871rjbue4k.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:11:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2lj53r9.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 12:57, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. > > Commit d4e4a3824d380e576b56a74aa714db205fcc59a4 adds pandoc. > > The packages: > > - ruby-pandoc-ruby > - rapicorn > - ganeti > - manuskript > - emacs-org-web-tools > - emacs-ox-pandoc > > do not use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc; I do not know if it matters or > if they need to also switch. More all Haskell packages in > haskell-xyz.scm. If these packages only use the =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2=80=9D executable they sho= uld use the =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2=80=9D package instead of =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D. = =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D is only meant for Haskell packages that use Pandoc as a library. This is a much rarer case, so we can assume that most packages should use =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2=80= =9D instead of =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D. --=20 Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 07 11:27:41 2020 Received: (at 33844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 15:27:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQBLx-0006XI-D7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:27:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com ([209.85.128.50]:36174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQBLv-0006X4-8y for 33844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:27:40 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id e2so2868291wme.1 for <33844@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:27:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rmoT9X1CQ05sHWEdDQWYVoJKHqa1QmgDks+iJEU4slQ=; b=KMLLhaIGElyrE0YabR/LaaNFeu2ITvvhNDLfbYDtEy6BbBgrHOTjwyxUHhyL/DKUyS lbigoaNFZM+o9WTjV+M9fLKzc60kYjp/vrk7bMWTj5BzfsA+TG1kv4ndCTrtVQi8yW9Z JGLoRooZ3/9+M3L14SAZYA34ft7edXkq4tDFaF2wCYWhEtM2B2xSp8DQyzFYrH2/wElR HnE2g+Tj/eU7nUxu/FMFGWnADwMJ/u3exwb9F8qmMxtbcI/gASh1AHl63R8HbGw/PRfH ShxR1ZnU2SD75qb52xBhJWiTTrDjix1H+jD35fNsFHsusLJCXLrTttE4CgnDU7z5PZxv c79A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rmoT9X1CQ05sHWEdDQWYVoJKHqa1QmgDks+iJEU4slQ=; b=dwrYagFLVol6WGGNTfSg2IR6iI0dM0XRzLJ/BCOKh4n/qyMikCmC+CdAUwnenBgTZS HZvK1enhzZ5Srbn4rBt0JKulWwrxo35b/VMhqWX3U6nVJx8T2vjrQNfNcOApK0GfJC8c mQi205DPYzK+H3JrK8KwgQmykdPjX37pTaftfe5xzpdVK0KJmO9ZxKKcEf7ONioXg7ia U3bmi1KS/7ZfJmu5JxQHc7U1aH4tJUYMwQ7FnwoJIqC0Fj94d9RiTy9wtavvsxko/Uka vt0GfP1sutLVH1Vbuth2UjU7iRJJtGaieweEfahGsJZ7BbT4vdYFwdwOfGqD0AJkTjOG Rh5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WEVaiNNbn5steuwwUQ0li4WIvm0F/5SO38cglUs2G/0cMgkMY UZF+Ciuw1m6PmdaKU974r+I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0d+wXowxm/Wovh+D54vMxXLqJz5+qetqRay+GTeg9yu85vAJWVnMvSHcu9Emy6g3QCZt/CQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cbd1:: with SMTP id n17mr3806036wmi.120.1602084453448; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm3831967wru.63.2020.10.07.08.27.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:27:32 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> <871rjbue4k.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2lj53r9.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 17:27:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2lj53r9.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:11:38 +0200") Message-ID: <87o8le83a3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844 Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dear, On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > zimoun writes: >>> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. The packages: =E2=80=A6 >> - rapicorn >> - ganeti >> - manuskript >> - emacs-org-web-tools >> - emacs-ox-pandoc >> - ruby-pandoc-ruby =E2=80=A6 now uses =E2=80=99pandoc=E2=80=99 instead of =E2=80=99ghc-pandoc= =E2=80=99, see: c22c6de453 gnu: rapicorn: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. 885332832c gnu: ganeti: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. 5dc5a3116b gnu: manuskript: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. 991c61678b gnu: emacs-org-web-tools: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. d37279ee1e gnu: emacs-ox-pandoc: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. 8cc8e584ab gnu: ruby-pandoc-ruby: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > If these packages only use the =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2=80=9D executable they s= hould use the > =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2=80=9D package instead of =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D.= =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D is only meant > for Haskell packages that use Pandoc as a library. This is a much rarer > case, so we can assume that most packages should use =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2= =80=9D instead of > =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D. The only non-Haskell package remaining is =E2=80=99gnu/packages/mail.scm (muchsync)=E2=80=99. Once this package is done (see #43848 [1]), we should= be able to close this bug, I guess. [1] All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 18 19:04:55 2020 Received: (at 33844-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2020 00:04:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqPjy-0007Jl-V3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 19:04:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com ([209.85.221.51]:41441) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqPjw-0007JE-L5 for 33844-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 19:04:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a12so4302597wrv.8 for <33844-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:04:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TQCa7KY463RorZzAFCZz3yZmWpCeOQtImSPxdzvwKAE=; b=oxxykVIahJ6QKQzmj5es0jD1XZMB0ZVH/Af/QxjIJi7lznNjcyEZyrDkSiYIGNaPp/ 0dKsTrD3uQFrrm1MOd5onBekyUX0G9l34IY8ilTtxKQMhADEVwe4+5o8TryRqaA1hcVF TNzFOpRNQ8aWTXiyi2UhBkIKoMZ3o9oDkTah81jaq1U3KmKV+z7BJQLlFLslYBnoNiML dx/uQA/Y8UI55Txq4UrWKXJjpHefFxN8cqnlHDw5zUuILIR99CZN79IfON0pXa9OF0jv GXw8SjU312h8qOAhY9FbDmZBJHrs445/jYGUCruEwLaaGasSK5UUr8YvDADNxZBm0t6X tqRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TQCa7KY463RorZzAFCZz3yZmWpCeOQtImSPxdzvwKAE=; b=MdiUxk5b+RNLCYvBXq6ZiAh83r5W9xiMcruPPs2dUyYOnJJf2SElRMWc0gVhqyX+X4 DufLCfVkJN8/0oTHGRIDeFSQ4mpYSJAPuecM+9vMbnh6tnsZ3Qe9UgMWm4NAtpfEKt1s d1PjEI5xEODjLFbsjgaj1HVukJ3azhLRAifaDR5s/EXK437vnLKnbtlQvuGneuC05WVB gbqIRpUbHt9NjThABRVSBap+JU6riIEX9POpnYltACrpa/o9Za6N1k8K3UETc+BxUN85 4O+2zUtD3lng8bE1izgZXkaZeuwARucR8Hlzx9P8G+a9zcVHzg60nicFDUG7+6zik4R+ Il7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GWnnr3uPbF394/0DcOwjECNR9IVDQGvdav61N67jn/L0Dbgrk 422/KJLVU3CLo1qQNGWQ9bXXu7PL3oHFDA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXXzwE7PiHTUBAIYUmySg8Kq8z4J6vvm73BTeHrAZZp/X36brz1VDEG74U2z16ilieT72Y6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4c4d:: with SMTP id n13mr6952405wrt.356.1608336287154; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:04:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm16141715wrv.12.2020.12.18.16.04.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:04:46 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net> <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net> <871rjbue4k.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2lj53r9.fsf@elephly.net> <87o8le83a3.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:03:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o8le83a3.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Wed, 07 Oct 2020 17:27:32 +0200") Message-ID: <86sg82slup.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33844-done Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33844-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 at 17:27, zimoun wrote: > Dear, > > On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> zimoun writes: > >>>> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. > > The packages: =E2=80=A6 > >>> - rapicorn >>> - ganeti >>> - manuskript >>> - emacs-org-web-tools >>> - emacs-ox-pandoc >>> - ruby-pandoc-ruby > > =E2=80=A6 now uses =E2=80=99pandoc=E2=80=99 instead of =E2=80=99ghc-pando= c=E2=80=99, see: > > c22c6de453 gnu: rapicorn: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > 885332832c gnu: ganeti: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > 5dc5a3116b gnu: manuskript: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > 991c61678b gnu: emacs-org-web-tools: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > d37279ee1e gnu: emacs-ox-pandoc: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > 8cc8e584ab gnu: ruby-pandoc-ruby: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > > >> If these packages only use the =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2=80=9D executable they = should use the >> =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2=80=9D package instead of =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D= . =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D is only meant >> for Haskell packages that use Pandoc as a library. This is a much rarer >> case, so we can assume that most packages should use =E2=80=9Cpandoc=E2= =80=9D instead of >> =E2=80=9Cghc-pandoc=E2=80=9D. > > The only non-Haskell package remaining is =E2=80=99gnu/packages/mail.scm > (muchsync)=E2=80=99. Once this package is done (see #43848 [1]), we shou= ld be > able to close this bug, I guess. Done by , see 8514dfdee6. Closing. Thanks, simon From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:15:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator