From unknown Fri Jun 13 09:58:19 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#33830 <33830@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#33830 <33830@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 27.0.50; help-xref-stack contains bad entries Reply-To: bug#33830 <33830@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:58:19 +0000 retitle 33830 27.0.50; help-xref-stack contains bad entries reassign 33830 emacs submitter 33830 Alex Branham severity 33830 normal tag 33830 moreinfo confirmed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 21 11:56:34 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2018 16:56:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gaO6E-0000Vg-4m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:56:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gaO6C-0000VU-9q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:56:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaO64-0000u6-Tg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:56:26 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaO61-0000r1-S7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:56:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaO5x-00048Q-QB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:56:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaO5j-0000aR-TJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:56:10 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]:42104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaO5j-0000X8-MM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:56:03 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id v23so5659344otk.9 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:56:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=yrno6Hin08/Adoz8PUrerk88UQZXyvD9606jMZhwXl8=; b=D0fZExtpbT/1i7iMa0FcbBFcmV5w12kYvar/yWeZT2geq1/fKp8e1pQPI+CfIQKExF la2AatRRiYUTOU3oD8diwsrhnwLC4JCwNpNC9cNCUcsfIKbsO6GFV8xgK6t0+/Blngdt QJl7smlKT7juWdCdnkBEsY7w2gntcuWyCudr5Utkg7nfyCA6OnVGSjodIl6E/Zr8FBWc x3q9QJLLWHFvhUhqqK2rMD0zxmLBGJOYXZ+GKsYToRVo5BDB/gQqATGTL93GiNDLNmzA BZGnZSU+PNDIID3kcD8VBnPq7X/k4fq5dJkX5grxcQN67sXRkSG2lIYRCYBi+lmji0bW E6nA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=yrno6Hin08/Adoz8PUrerk88UQZXyvD9606jMZhwXl8=; b=uUYtwhUqNND00PeXslB4ONOvbiPzIarQA2UkKxjI+3BUBXcf/i6YZMcGTIAosliUp2 cMKLQGJQlOWP11FSjaNiE61rJUqfZ7hVvFmS+Tt1fqGk+FxykTXoBNsegLrho+diCZ/A sF43RrmQFxWilm5TRjrbTCt54Xegp6tXpwHnF3sJ5wfrhott6XDzR2yOm2WHCJAUzZm4 EJFEO6GTXasZaB126ZljkzAp11Z+OBQcOClF+WgwxZcxdFAw+60mY+jP+JFRc32CAB5a nfZKJdRaFfFGUfsTZB2LdHISosWiuQkefFN5Hl8fpdlm+ynR+z61srLopLTyD3sQZXZp WSbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukepALV/oGccAFgaAkHNGNIV/3UWz2VIKKxCoBWF520W4Fb39VSz D9jHRKOTWv9wWOwUZWOT0LHzKaTT X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN52H0Jx1mrWHitfVJdsjv8zNP0XTEBVZ66yqdvS0jRtXY9DNg+EXg+Td4Pbyar8g257FOlggg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7285:: with SMTP id t5mr2245598otj.228.1545411360837; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from earth (cpe-70-114-192-208.austin.res.rr.com. [70.114.192.208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i12sm11893978otc.48.2018.12.21.08.55.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:56:00 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 From: Alex Branham To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.0.50; help-xref-stack contains bad entries Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 10:55:59 -0600 Message-ID: <87sgyqyg2o.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Sometimes `help-xref-stack' contains "bad" entries, which makes help-go-forward and help-go-back error in a strange way. To see what I mean: emacs -q C-h f car RET C-h k C-x t C-h f cdr RET Now that the *Help* buffer is displaying `cdr', if you try to go back (with "l" or clicking the back button), you get "user-error C-x t is undefined". Alex From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 27 17:39:13 2018 Received: (at 33830) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2018 22:39:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gceJ7-0007Uh-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:39:13 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f181.google.com ([209.85.222.181]:46295) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gceJ4-0007US-VP for 33830@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:39:11 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f181.google.com with SMTP id q1so11632630qkf.13 for <33830@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 14:39:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UVrb3Uq7cnJl+Rae+N/FkNy25T5SF6zJO8SsWJK40DQ=; b=JUmQ4nOgVK0gnaJkuoz8c5/TOsCCI+UpK+VQ6cPTnKy//LH9X1rOw/+qqti/QaGS+h HvfwHbtKfYtLl31NJI9nV+KD5u6JxkXBWmj3Hi0dnXD5x+J/V2PHbsMOaxhL0k2QDWwI A3BF58FDLs6kC5U04JECMnqQb3sJKGyLqQn3b/gAjXSd1a/iTGik4b2F8HFe5ParukIR P2CdnGjvkE3/1b+jzEAnOR2DCDt3jc+rSdWMiccc8uKd0LhOO5gMpZFcHrClE8OjI7H6 xYxRjB4NWw8UMbabgf3CvTVQ6DzKBtg9UCorxg5Pj+bKROZPvpgHjWXKblUZEpjuk/JE QijQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UVrb3Uq7cnJl+Rae+N/FkNy25T5SF6zJO8SsWJK40DQ=; b=l0a2KT/XswfXYYhftHLIGgHD/znSg5d9ejOwQ6X+idBUtYZnD6Vo49spJ+GVwKB1fZ alXBpFrpHTZ8kKRIKPk+Jy2TXXhmZmKSB09H5kHZPIzAep190QiZZ7LzkD5ZMCHF1lAe tITBnZq9P0jo5uxKc1NVMBiGHfMsUQF9tjo3Lb3JXzMU2xwukhNivFhMlnpwioIx28OC yhBjb5DoqIhIE/Fmnh+oZMkZy9L1/IDmIZoKWr/VP2xkI17hL+0GRwe4pxQ3fteN49pA HuitQt3m1G3NdKVGWFJNIu+fNdbKKa8ukDwa8mqGCykVand4r1m3lkPCmqOEgKEM09fQ Vz0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeX40Dv9VgHVt0QE8DNjNi7K+ux7WTMIVemccnH8ZG0YfmqH9EW 8ZPM++gFZjIFgrt+wM914a87BCK/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6BnimRPtdlFB8+KVVCGVYPsmxSAXhockmqs+m6b2Pf6C7MhM2ty8vKjR+zrhE+YhW+TV+sfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:5f82:: with SMTP id t124mr22889830qkb.204.1545950345117; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 14:39:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from hideo ([181.167.176.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e49sm16601105qta.0.2018.12.27.14.39.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Dec 2018 14:39:04 -0800 (PST) From: Federico Tedin To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#33830: 27.0.50; help-xref-stack contains bad entries References: <87sgyqyg2o.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:38:59 -0300 In-Reply-To: <87sgyqyg2o.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Fri, 21 Dec 2018 10:55:59 -0600") Message-ID: <874layegsc.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33830 Cc: 33830@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Alex Branham writes: > Sometimes `help-xref-stack' contains "bad" entries, which makes > help-go-forward and help-go-back error in a strange way. To see what I > mean: > > emacs -q > > C-h f car RET > C-h k C-x t > C-h f cdr RET > > Now that the *Help* buffer is displaying `cdr', if you try to go back > (with "l" or clicking the back button), you get "user-error C-x t is > undefined". > > Alex I've noticed that the `describe-key' and `describe-function' functions both call `help-setup-xref' with key sequences and functions respectively, even if said key sequences or functions are not valid (i.e. when the key sequence isn't bound to anything and the function does not exist). An example of this: 1) M-:: (describe-function 'hello) RET 2) C-h f car RET 3) On the *Help* buffer, press 'l' The message 'Symbol=E2=80=99s function definition is void: hello' will be displayed, and the *Help* buffer will contain "hello is ". Also, for some reason, after pressing 'r', two [back] buttons will be shown. Maybe `help-setup-xref' should only be called when it is certain that the key sequence/function/etc. exists? (tested on master branch) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 13 08:15:01 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2020 12:15:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6C8L-0006gy-G5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:15:01 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f172.google.com ([209.85.219.172]:41674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k6C8J-0006gk-DT for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:14:59 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f172.google.com with SMTP id s195so3181337ybc.8 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:14:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6UE4OY9eCbMeVY3QmnS7VXY8//vlVn/uRAp0h6OZ/MM=; b=GHAecG6tjPX0r4S8+0hH1OOb+MmlBS+K35P13VPB5R+6N+GNlbsn++Eu8dcamPIBaN KvLY0yV5R35+qSYcpx1jEhXDRegUi6qWgRCpbGVM+bC0VBKnEqP5IuRWvqacjyoa48hs C8YIDokkLvd1O7+LgUfiHEHh217tuclc3m5mCUgeXxxsjWN6fTBFe4Bdoi4iWtPXe3Br P0AmSgfkIpDNuJgE3qnJzC+GGGbY/3kqqCbGhZc5o5nwkazyybHEvum852pxhLtHGDVe ebtRw6fgs1wJwVPx4P0auzcPp1LP6phjKu0i8Qy7DHiQ1Msa7YezrlBxJJ3RtbU/z3Nh 5pgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mkUrFxgC4OG1hDBmyuKfnCuPqQXhmBaFl0nZEMd3JIA3Y0KO8 Z3Zm0kispQ5XmTBgnzijOLhC54Uh07lYn44EoZqkQrjkfdU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRkKiejBvdUSqHhz3iigKHspPrgzF3PNPVNe8up9+DrY6kr+d6I9g7AiiuXnv538vi9Tr/WhF2Bi70J0Kwag8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:b290:: with SMTP id k16mr5895460ybj.389.1597320893869; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:14:53 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:14:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 33830 + confirmed found 33830 28.0.50 thanks Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.172 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) tags 33830 + confirmed found 33830 28.0.50 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 23 09:58:24 2021 Received: (at 33830) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2021 13:58:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lw3OZ-0004vJ-PM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:58:23 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lw3OX-0004uy-Me for 33830@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:58:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=e6Wn5d7bRoNf2q0UN2qg7HFdqAGdLuTWDOZmVqMgXEY=; b=TxhkGRQ97ntoa8n/eJD3JGY+MA IkzKM3+z7r6SeWEEsy+qsH9lydgjMDGdUkp6ok9RYR0o8ft9LqAAAZApiiMbqSqw97O158jkfhqgJ R9baFiXsjFaiPalivKk5zwKbgo0lWfUSYYqcoCHM+68fWKCoAtKJ59ug9D+vfN+G2m74=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw3OP-0005SM-Ag; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:58:15 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#33830: 27.0.50; help-xref-stack contains bad entries References: <87sgyqyg2o.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: The Clash's _Sandinista!_: "Police On My Back" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:58:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sgyqyg2o.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Fri, 21 Dec 2018 10:55:59 -0600") Message-ID: <87h7holm2z.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Alex Branham writes: > Sometimes `help-xref-stack' contains "bad" entries, which makes > help-go-forward and help-go-back error in a strange way. To see what I > mean: > > emacs -q > > C-h f car RET > C-h k C-x t > C-h f [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33830 Cc: 33830@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Alex Branham writes: > Sometimes `help-xref-stack' contains "bad" entries, which makes > help-go-forward and help-go-back error in a strange way. To see what I > mean: > > emacs -q > > C-h f car RET > C-h k C-x t > C-h f cdr RET > > Now that the *Help* buffer is displaying `cdr', if you try to go back > (with "l" or clicking the back button), you get "user-error C-x t is > undefined". This doesn't exactly reproduce for me in Emacs 27.1, because `C-x t' is bound there. But this works: C-h f car RET C-h k C-x t t C-h f cdr RET C-x o l I do get the "is undefined" message, but then hitting `l' again takes me back to `car'. I guess it could make sense for `l'/`r' to skip these "invalid" entries, but on the other hand, I can see how they'd be vaguely useful. Does anybody have any opinions here? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 23 09:58:27 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2021 13:58:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lw3Od-0004vY-0a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:58:27 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lw3Ob-0004v7-O0 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:58:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cc3d5q8gJ3Qy5kKq8/1FEzw2a0K0xCZEUtvYLmiyQLg=; b=N+LM1PGyDN4NwIK1C6FArycb25 no+NEkPYrCmgLwvKsRFshKKjg2QTudce+vJwyBpcOMQ/URxUGf3BM7pOodwkiAFjuXvh6wacARyU5 b4RDweVpBq6I0SK5gJiAa0xTpfCv66tk/TGz7bCWtPJjPZjeSYqo+QRqBrbDEBNJQZOQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lw3OU-0005SU-8I for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:58:20 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:58:17 +0200 Message-Id: <87fsx8lm2u.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #33830 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 33830 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 33830 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 22 10:20:59 2021 Received: (at 33830) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2021 14:20:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6ZZK-0004UJ-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:20:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6ZZI-0004U1-LB for 33830@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:20:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=X+hBDWCP0KkAkm87YlIrkc7hE8bxTKchCN0iPSth1vU=; b=ujEnxuBgY59srmGs8AC2fCCb90 kisce0Q8Z3cAZDJhzkOdYbiEYLuoyue2qjNOrhYDj0hY+Jer2j3Tm/S2zFnlBsnO4fWlJmQYhux6p 0om+l0ZKZSEJBIQ2G/4Pb4txVF8wz4Zs35swekyj8dd31lQ9M3Pmo9ur08+anKQdGjA4=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m6ZZA-0003Po-7X; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:20:50 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#33830: 27.0.50; help-xref-stack contains bad entries References: <87sgyqyg2o.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7holm2z.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Nazar's _Guerrilla_: "Diverted" Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:20:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h7holm2z.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:58:12 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmvaig5c.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I guess it could make sense for `l'/`r' to skip these "invalid" entries, > but on the other hand, I can see how they'd be vaguely useful. > > Does anybody have any opinions here? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33830 Cc: 33830@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I guess it could make sense for `l'/`r' to skip these "invalid" entries, > but on the other hand, I can see how they'd be vaguely useful. > > Does anybody have any opinions here? Nobody had, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 22 10:21:03 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2021 14:21:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41426 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6ZZP-0004VH-4P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:21:03 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55496) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6ZZN-0004U9-Ro for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:21:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MLcUtwpTyW8vtqOToYWqCNVlh02FLdKhb9OCe7j2srA=; b=BRGNhmyJ5DvFgne49sGtFoEAtZ 6O3GBMc0TAjib7540+V3GvKvl5rVMorxZZz+HEPFTGSJNNVioUUIH+/qGDf7y4lTa+wAqSbNvD9uY QUOHmPy3hAVAPh4WJvarQyp9uo3HuvZRVlLkLirmn1c2mzSkFBh3CBAmDBbEuLsqVcwM=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m6ZZG-0003Py-Ao for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:20:56 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:20:53 +0200 Message-Id: <87o8auig56.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #33830 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 33830 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 33830 quit From unknown Fri Jun 13 09:58:19 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator