GNU bug report logs - #3382
23.0.94; reveal-mode and outline-minor-mode

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 23:35:03 UTC

Severity: wishlist

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 3382 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#3382; Package emacs. (Mon, 25 May 2009 23:35:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. (Mon, 25 May 2009 23:35:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org
Subject: 23.0.94; reveal-mode and outline-minor-mode
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:58:23 +0100
Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
and the precise symptoms of the bug:

I am trying to use outline-minor-mode and reveal-mode together while
editing a LaTeX document. There's one small annoyance with reveal mode.
It is this. Suppose my doc with outline-minor and hide-body looks like
this:

** Section 1...
** Section 2...
*** Subsection 1
*** Subsection 2

If I use reveal-mode to open Section 2 by moving the point to ..., the
tree opens fine. Now move the point to Section 1 and the buffer changes
to:

** Section 1...
** Section 2...

i.e. the headlines of subsections are now hidden. I wonder if
reveal-mode can stop hiding anything that is not hidden before. As you
can see the Subsection headlines are as important as the Section
headlines for an overview of the content.

Thanks.

Leo



Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#3382; Package emacs. (Tue, 26 May 2009 01:35:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. (Tue, 26 May 2009 01:35:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 3382 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 3382 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#3382: 23.0.94; reveal-mode and outline-minor-mode
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:29:30 -0400
severity 3382 wishlist
thanks

> If I use reveal-mode to open Section 2 by moving the point to ..., the
> tree opens fine. Now move the point to Section 1 and the buffer changes
> to:

> ** Section 1...
> ** Section 2...

> i.e. the headlines of subsections are now hidden.  I wonder if
> reveal-mode can stop hiding anything that is not hidden before.

There's no such mechanism, no.
If you have an idea of how that could work, I'm all ears.

My only related plan is to provide a reveal command that reveals
non-transiently (kind of like the mark can be used to force one other
place to stay reveled).


        Stefan



Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' Request was from Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> to control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Tue, 26 May 2009 01:35:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#3382; Package emacs. (Tue, 26 May 2009 09:45:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. (Tue, 26 May 2009 09:45:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#3382: 23.0.94; reveal-mode and outline-minor-mode
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:41:25 +0100
On 2009-05-26 02:29 +0100, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> There's no such mechanism, no.
> If you have an idea of how that could work, I'm all ears.

Thank you for your response. I think I'll live with that for now.

> My only related plan is to provide a reveal command that reveals
> non-transiently (kind of like the mark can be used to force one other
> place to stay reveled).

Leo





This bug report was last modified 15 years and 166 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.