Subject: bug#33785: df: don't suppress remote mounts

From: Assaf Gordon <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:04:18 -0700

tags 33785 notabug
close 33785
stop

Hello,

On 2018-12-19 10:05 a.m., Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 17/12/18 22:42, lzhong wrote:
>>
>> According to the following commit
>>
>> commit 2e81e62243409c5c574b899f52b08c000e4d99fd
>>       df: only suppress remote mounts of separate exports with --total
>>
[...]
>> The remote mounts should not be suppressed after this change. However,
>> it turns out
>>
>> it doesn't work as the message described. The remote mounts are still
>> suppressed. And here is
>>
> 
> The intent of the patch was not to suppress _separate_ exports on the server.
> I.E. nas.example.com:/Photos and nas.example.com:/Download would not
> be suppressed (even if they have the same device id).
> 
> If you want all nfs mounts you could `df -a -t nfs`

With no further comments, I'm closing this as "notabug".

Discussion can continue by replying to this thread.
   -assaf