GNU bug report logs -
#33772
StumpWM broken commands?
Previous Next
Full log
Message #17 received at 33772 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Pierre Langlois writes:
> Hello!
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber <at> dustycloud.org> skribis:
>>>
>>>> It seems to me that StumpWM broke somehow, for some reason. I can
>>>> confirm there was a version change:
>>>>
>>>> -sbcl-stumpwm <at> 18.05:out /gnu/store/i0picr2xr2aq2a52nsaw67nvar1r3khw-sbcl-stumpwm-18.05
>>>> +sbcl-stumpwm <at> 18.11:out /gnu/store/6h2iln76dx8pxdp1hsaqb1yncm8viczj-sbcl-stumpwm-18.11
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure if this is the cause or something else. At any rate, when
>>>> I try to run commands such as "gnew" (the command to make a new
>>>> group/workstation) I get back:
>>>>
>>>> Error In Command 'gnew': invalid number of arguments: 2
>>>>
>>>> I though I'd try running the command manually and check the error, but
>>>> this also happens with eval! Some other commands are not affected.
>>>>
>>>> (I can try re-enabling the live REPL in StumpWM to play around with it,
>>>> but I currently have it off because they have the same live hacking
>>>> vulnerability in SBCL/SLIME that we had in Guile/Geiser some time ago.)
>>>
>>> Pierre, does that ring a bell?
>>>
>>> Others on the mailing list reported being happy with the upgrade, but
>>> maybe they use different bits of StumpWM.
>
> Ah yes, I can reproduce this :-/. Both in GuixSD and with Guix on top of
> ArchLinux. The 'gnew' command does work if you pass it the name of the
> new group as an argument, that's why I didn't notice this. It should
> interactively ask for a name if you don't pass one so that's still a
> regression.
>
> Maybe that's a bug upstream? It would be good to try StumpWM 18.11 on
> another distribution to see if this is specific to Guix. I cannot
> install it on ArchLinux though at the moment.
>
> I'll try to investigate more this week when I have more time.
>
> Thanks!
> Pierre
Thanks for looking into it! Yes if you can confirm it happens in
another distribution, we should file a bug upstream.
In the meanwhile, should I push the older version of the package as per
my diff above so people can use the older version if they need it?
- Chris
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 146 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.