GNU bug report logs - #33768
guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 33768 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 33768 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 13:49:34 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I've been unable to successfully build guix on aarch64 for a while, as
it fails several tests. This prevents "guix system reconfigure" from
working. It also fails with "guix build guix" as well as trying to build
from a local git checkout.

FAIL: tests/graph.scm
FAIL: tests/guix-package.sh
FAIL: tests/graph
FAIL: tests/guix-package

More details in the attached build log.

live well,
  vagrant

[jpykx3cm276bbfzak5g8g42k7d3lch-guix-0.16.0-4.60b0402.drv.bz2 (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #8 received at 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Cc: 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 16:01:10 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Possible workaround (not that mit-scheme works on aarch64 then, but at least guix does):

diff --git a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
index c7ab00380..25852d2af 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm
@@ -70,12 +70,7 @@
   #:use-module (ice-9 match))
 
 (define (mit-scheme-source-directory system version)
-  (string-append "mit-scheme-"
-                 (if (or (string-prefix? "x86_64" system)
-                         (string-prefix? "i686" system))
-                     ""
-                     "c-")
-                 version))
+  (string-append "mit-scheme-" version))
 
 (define-public mit-scheme
   (package
@@ -173,7 +168,7 @@
                                 ("i686-linux"
                                  (string-append version "-i386"))
                                 (_
-                                 (string-append "c-" version)))
+                                 version))
                               ".tar.gz"))
           (sha256
            (match (%current-system)
@@ -182,7 +177,10 @@
                "03m7cc035w3avs91j2pcz9f15ssgvgp3rm045d1vbydqrkzfyw8k"))
              ("i686-linux"
               (base32
-               "05sjyz90xxfnmi87qv8x0yx0fcallnzl1dciygdafp317pn489is"))))))))
+               "05sjyz90xxfnmi87qv8x0yx0fcallnzl1dciygdafp317pn489is"))
+             (_
+              (base32
+               "18kllckm3iky59wk3nvx41kfn56lpp468savvrk41agjza2hqqhy"))))))))
 
     ;; Fails to build on MIPS, see <http://bugs.gnu.org/18221>.
     ;; Also, the portable C version of MIT/GNU Scheme did not work in time for

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #11 received at 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Cc: 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 21:12:08 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Should be fixed on master.  Can you confirm?

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #14 received at 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Cc: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>, 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:31:24 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> Should be fixed on master.  Can you confirm?

Vagrant confirmed on IRC that it is fixed on master.

As suggested in the armhf bug about the same issue, now that it's
working we should tag a new commit.


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>,
 Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Cc: 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 07:50:13 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 2018-12-17, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>> Should be fixed on master.  Can you confirm?
>
> Vagrant confirmed on IRC that it is fixed on master.

I think that was a different bug.

As of 2119cd3a350cb5544418a0e8ac6c7fb6dcbf0a13 it still wasn't fixed; I
haven't checked more recently.

live well,
  vagrant

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Cc: 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>,
 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: Re: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:05:56 -0500

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> writes:

> On 2018-12-17, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>>> Should be fixed on master.  Can you confirm?
>>
>> Vagrant confirmed on IRC that it is fixed on master.
>
> I think that was a different bug.
>
> As of 2119cd3a350cb5544418a0e8ac6c7fb6dcbf0a13 it still wasn't fixed; I
> haven't checked more recently.

If I'm not mistaken, although the bug is fixed on our 'master' branch,
the problem is that our 'guix' package still uses an older commit from
before the bug was fixed.  Now we need to update our 'guix' package.
See also <https://bugs.gnu.org/33754>.

      Mark

Message #23 received at 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Cc: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>, 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:08:43 +0100

Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:

> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> writes:
>
>> On 2018-12-17, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>>>> Should be fixed on master.  Can you confirm?
>>>
>>> Vagrant confirmed on IRC that it is fixed on master.
>>
>> I think that was a different bug.
>>
>> As of 2119cd3a350cb5544418a0e8ac6c7fb6dcbf0a13 it still wasn't fixed; I
>> haven't checked more recently.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, although the bug is fixed on our 'master' branch,
> the problem is that our 'guix' package still uses an older commit from
> before the bug was fixed.  Now we need to update our 'guix' package.
> See also <https://bugs.gnu.org/33754>.

I’ve done it a few hours ago.  Please close the bug if we’re all set!

Ludo’.

Message #26 received at 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Mark H Weaver
 <mhw <at> netris.org>
Cc: 33768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:03:08 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 2018-12-19, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:
>
>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 2018-12-17, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>>>>> Should be fixed on master.  Can you confirm?
>>>>
>>>> Vagrant confirmed on IRC that it is fixed on master.
>>>
>>> I think that was a different bug.
>>>
>>> As of 2119cd3a350cb5544418a0e8ac6c7fb6dcbf0a13 it still wasn't fixed; I
>>> haven't checked more recently.
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken, although the bug is fixed on our 'master' branch,
>> the problem is that our 'guix' package still uses an older commit from
>> before the bug was fixed.  Now we need to update our 'guix' package.
>> See also <https://bugs.gnu.org/33754>.
>
> I’ve done it a few hours ago.  Please close the bug if we’re all set!

It built for me on aarch64-linux as of
af8c90e86230e1bae93b5ba9b6f77a76f302e203.

Thanks everyone!

live well,
  vagrant

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #31 received at 33768-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Cc: 33768-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Subject: Re: bug#33768: guix 0.16.0-4.60b0402 fails tests on aarch64
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:10:07 +0100

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> skribis:

> On 2018-12-19, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:
>>
>>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-12-17, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:12:08PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>>>>>> Should be fixed on master.  Can you confirm?
>>>>>
>>>>> Vagrant confirmed on IRC that it is fixed on master.
>>>>
>>>> I think that was a different bug.
>>>>
>>>> As of 2119cd3a350cb5544418a0e8ac6c7fb6dcbf0a13 it still wasn't fixed; I
>>>> haven't checked more recently.
>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken, although the bug is fixed on our 'master' branch,
>>> the problem is that our 'guix' package still uses an older commit from
>>> before the bug was fixed.  Now we need to update our 'guix' package.
>>> See also <https://bugs.gnu.org/33754>.
>>
>> I’ve done it a few hours ago.  Please close the bug if we’re all set!
>
> It built for me on aarch64-linux as of
> af8c90e86230e1bae93b5ba9b6f77a76f302e203.

Awesome, closing!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.