GNU bug report logs - #33729
27.0.50; Partial glyphs not rendered for Gujarati with Harfbuzz enabled (renders fine using m17n)

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:22:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Khaled Hosny <dr.khaled.hosny <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 33729 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rgm <at> gnu.org, kaushal.modi <at> gmail.com, far.nasiri.m <at> gmail.com, behdad <at> behdad.org
Subject: bug#33729: 27.0.50; Partial glyphs not rendered for Gujarati with Harfbuzz enabled (renders fine using m17n)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 12:11:15 +0200
> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 11:06:44 +0200
> From: Khaled Hosny <dr.khaled.hosny <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>, far.nasiri.m <at> gmail.com, behdad <at> behdad.org,
> 	33729 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, kaushal.modi <at> gmail.com
> 
> > Alternatively, we could just use HarfBuzz’s own built in ucdn-based
> > Unicode function for this. The only reason for overriding this in Emacs
> > was to keep HarfBuzz and Emacs Unicode support in sync, but if we are
> > going to duplicate the Unicode script data then better use what HarfBuzz
> > has.
> > 
> > I’m going to try this now.
> 
> I pushed a commit to harfbuzz branch that I think fixes this issue now.

Thanks.

There's a FIXME in the change you pushed (which I believe just
repeats what was already in the previous version).  Ca you tell more
about the problem we need to fix there?




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 23 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.