GNU bug report logs - #33614
reposurgeon build is broken

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#33614: closed (reposurgeon build is broken)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:09:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:08:25 -0500
with message-id <87v8kz1why.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#33614: reposurgeon build is broken
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33614,
regarding reposurgeon build is broken
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
33614: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33614
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
To: <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: reposurgeon build is broken
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:47:37 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

  class OrderedSet(collections.MutableSet):
=== Testing mailbox-out/mailbox-in roundtripping:
  authormatch.fi
/tmp/guix-build-reposurgeon-3.43.drv-0/reposurgeon-3.43/reposurgeon:13680: DeprecationWarning: Using or importing the ABCs from 'collections' instead of from 'collections.abc' is deprecated, and in 3.8 it will stop working
  class OrderedSet(collections.MutableSet):
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/guix-build-reposurgeon-3.43.drv-0/reposurgeon-3.43/reposurgeon", line 1585, in f
    if len(cache) <= pos: cache.append(next(it))
StopIteration

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/guix-build-reposurgeon-3.43.drv-0/reposurgeon-3.43/reposurgeon", line 13800, in <module>
    main()
  File "/tmp/guix-build-reposurgeon-3.43.drv-0/reposurgeon-3.43/reposurgeon", line 13790, in main
    cmd.Cmd.onecmd(interpreter, interpreter.precmd(arg))
  File "/gnu/store/b7fqhszxl02g6pfm3vw6b3cjz472qrly-python-3.7.0/lib/python3.7/cmd.py", line 217, in onecmd
    return func(arg)
  File "/tmp/guix-build-reposurgeon-3.43.drv-0/reposurgeon-3.43/reposurgeon", line 10761, in do_edit
    self.edit(self.selection, line)
  File "/tmp/guix-build-reposurgeon-3.43.drv-0/reposurgeon-3.43/reposurgeon", line 9339, in edit
    self.do_mailbox_in("<" + tfname)
  File "/tmp/guix-build-reposurgeon-3.43.drv-0/reposurgeon-3.43/reposurgeon", line 10580, in do_mailbox_in
    for commit in self.chosen().commits():
RuntimeError: generator raised StopIteration
make[2]: *** [Makefile:90: mailboxing] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:24: default] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:120: check] Error 2

Test suite failed, dumping logs.
Backtrace:
           4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/k4qpksv3j8yljcb89lc228h78l6â¦")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
   191:35  3 (_ _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   863:16  2 (every1 #<procedure 80f2c0 at /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqâ¦> â¦)
In /gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm:
   799:28  1 (_ _)
    369:6  0 (check #:target _ #:make-flags _ #:tests? _ # _ # _ # _)

/gnu/store/gfprsx2m62cvqbh7ysc9ay9slhijvmal-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm:369:6: In procedure check:
Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition &invoke-error [program: "make" arguments: ("check" "-j" "4" "ECHO=echo" "target=/gnu/store/0n2bv0yajwi7a8p3dg390i974ja2ldhl-reposurgeon-3.43") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f] 96ca80>)'.

[Message part 4 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 33614-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Subject: Re: bug#33614: reposurgeon build is broken
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:08:25 -0500

Hello,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 17:16, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Since no one care enough this package, I am propose to close this issue
>>> by simply removing the package.  WDYT?
>>
>> I'm fine with it.  I tried updating it, but it is now written in Go and
>> would require packaging a few new Go packages; the list is here [0].
>
>
> Please find attach the removal.  Once applied, feel free to close this
> report.

Applied!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.