From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 04 11:34:24 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2018 16:34:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60852 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUDeS-0002wZ-F3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 11:34:24 -0500 Received: from nimbus.chaotikum.eu ([104.238.167.87]:43254) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUDeP-0002wP-JY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 11:34:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chaotikum.eu; s=20170824; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IHSWyikj21Jbyt1w3jSaLLZWr6B3ANMdgx8Im/AsnbM=; b=DWFk6zux0fyf/ybINZ9SdSl+bJ N4Yv6GIyXbLKEkeBBeoCU5NmFJF4slKVEIPTmKZcHliiOLFB3g4QFxdVJUcCxRB2UEtIiJLtoHlov YEokl6Qf+tJZrS4DobGkH3K3mJOyLtj02mGToeVwApUDmj8R7KHDx3V3JpaWcaEN+J2Xh20qaIg9T 9/D2PGMiRa1d+TwsdH23Yw8lEmmlkAq/IdvaFmkaY8+h6lZV7ABATYzsswJ/IfWZtdtGuECFL16cY A8FbuZh6qQ4qMlMbeq5n1vzD0QrBw2FgIq8l52TPToEs+9AAGQma9KeY5VxC9glhrHR6YEOUrsrsw H2hdqPggxpcxeXFe2a3jJU9wEpWYxV57fcn5ZUbPaVv5USj4j1MPC43gGaDLwj2DmZXZlyVZjIz4i shyppomfKGfDgesIVsz0XuePXDbKIVcVSig0wW1c5LcHlXIx+qfi0xqdqNlnJvehmm3pRQxPGXC/u M/od6oMwt7CCKtnrcKX8Bxit; Received: from [2a00:8a60:c000:1:3dd5:5401:49b7:b5b] (port=39210 helo=coruscant.chaotikum.eu) by nimbus.chaotikum.eu with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gUDeO-0004z8-0w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:34:20 +0100 From: Thomas Schneider To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Gnus =?utf-8?Q?doesn=E2=80=99t?= display EBCDIC encoded mails correctly Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:34:16 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) X-Debbugs-Version: 5.13 X-Debbugs-Package: emacs,gnus Openpgp: id=E384009D3B54DCD321BF953295EE94A432583DB1; url=https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x95EE94A432583DB1; preference=signencrypt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) If you read this subject and ask yourself =E2=80=9CWhat in the name of=E2= =80=94?!=E2=80=9D, yes, exactly. This is cursed and should really not be a real-world issue, but I still consider it a bug. When viewing a mail whose headers and/or body is EBCDIC encoded, Gnus does not decode it correctly. Given this mail =E2=80=A6 ``` From: =3D?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iWlIGiQOKDiJWFiYSFmQ=3D=3D?=3D To: =3D?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iWlIGiQOKDiJWFiYSFmQ=3D=3D?=3D Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:55:15 +0100 Subject: =3D?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iJokCipIKRhYOjQImiQImVQMXCw8TJww=3D=3D?=3D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"EBCDIC-INT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Message-ID: 44iFQJikiYOSQIKZlqaVQIaWp0CRpJSXokCWpYWZQKOIhUCTgamoQISWh0sl ``` the Summary buffer shows (with gnus-summary-line-format "%U%R %&user-date; %(%[%5k: %-23,23f%]%)%B%s\n") =E2=80=A6 ``` . T16:55:15 [ 1.0k: =3D?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iWlIGi] =3D?EBCDIC-INT?B= ?44iJokCipIKRhYOjQImiQImVQMXCw8TJww=3D=3D?=3D ``` and the Article buffer shows =E2=80=A6 ``` From: =3D?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iWlIGiQOKDiJWFiYSFmQ=3D=3D?=3D Sender: qsx@chaotikum.eu To: =3D?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iWlIGiQOKDiJWFiYSFmQ=3D=3D?=3D Subject: =3D?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iJokCipIKRhYOjQImiQImVQMXCw8TJww=3D=3D?=3D Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:55:15 +0100 (32 minutes, 23 seconds ago) Message-ID: \343\210\205@\230\244\211\203\222@\202\231\226\246\225@\206\226\247@\221\24= 4\224\227\242@\226\245\205\231@\243\210\205@\223\201\251\250@\204\226\207K% ``` This was copy-pasted from a terminal Emacs, it shows the raw bytes escaped as octal numbers. So while the decoding routines work fine on more common charsets like UTF-8 and ISO 8859-1, they fail on EBCDIC. Not something likely to be encountered in real life, but still. Gnus v5.13 GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.1) of 2018-10-25 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 04 12:35:09 2018 Received: (at 33612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2018 17:35:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60913 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUEbF-0004gh-2B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:35:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45869) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUEbC-0004g2-PH for 33612@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:35:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUEb3-0004bJ-Mk for 33612@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:35:01 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUEb3-0004b8-JS; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:34:57 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2347 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gUEb3-0001C3-5k; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:34:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:34:51 +0200 Message-Id: <8336rd9ow4.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Thomas Schneider In-reply-to: (message from Thomas Schneider on Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:34:16 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#33612: Gnus =?utf-8?Q?doesn=E2=80=99t?= display EBCDIC encoded mails correctly References: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33612 Cc: 33612@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Thomas Schneider > Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:34:16 +0100 > > If you read this subject and ask yourself “What in the name of—?!”, yes, > exactly. This is cursed and should really not be a real-world issue, > but I still consider it a bug. > > When viewing a mail whose headers and/or body is EBCDIC encoded, Gnus > does not decode it correctly. > > Given this mail … > > ``` > From: =?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iWlIGiQOKDiJWFiYSFmQ==?= > To: =?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iWlIGiQOKDiJWFiYSFmQ==?= > Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:55:15 +0100 > Subject: =?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iJokCipIKRhYOjQImiQImVQMXCw8TJww==?= > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="EBCDIC-INT" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Message-ID: > > 44iFQJikiYOSQIKZlqaVQIaWp0CRpJSXokCWpYWZQKOIhUCTgamoQISWh0sl > ``` > > the Summary buffer shows (with gnus-summary-line-format "%U%R > %&user-date; %(%[%5k: %-23,23f%]%)%B%s\n") … > > ``` > . T16:55:15 [ 1.0k: =?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iWlIGi] =?EBCDIC-INT?B?44iJokCipIKRhYOjQImiQImVQMXCw8TJww==?= > ``` Does it help to evaluate the below? (define-coding-system-alias 'ebcdic-int 'ebcdic-us) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 04 13:03:54 2018 Received: (at 33612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2018 18:03:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUF33-0005TW-P4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:03:53 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:43888) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUF31-0005TK-VC for 33612@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:03:52 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438V9L5vJyz1qxDQ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:03:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438V9K71JDz1qw6F; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:03:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IFWgjn3gmmmo; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:03:48 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: o77lpu8YssUoCf16V28Eev+y0txaIDHUGGPd0q+uDGM3ZjyFIP4DWU4OZ8S5cRTf Received: from igel.home (ppp-188-174-152-183.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.152.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:03:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8DD42C30C0; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:03:45 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Thomas Schneider Subject: Re: bug#33612: Gnus =?utf-8?Q?doesn=E2=80=99t?= display EBCDIC encoded mails correctly References: X-Yow: Those aren't WINOS--that's my JUGGLER, my AERIALIST, my SWORD SWALLOWER, and my LATEX NOVELTY SUPPLIER!! Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:03:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Thomas Schneider's message of "Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:34:16 +0100") Message-ID: <87sgzdtbi6.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33612 Cc: 33612@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Dez 04 2018, Thomas Schneider wrote: > So while the decoding routines work fine on more common charsets like > UTF-8 and ISO 8859-1, they fail on EBCDIC. Not something likely to be > encountered in real life, but still. Looks like Emacs doesn't know about IBM038 aka EBCDIC-INT. Other EBCDIC encodings should work, though. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 04 13:30:24 2018 Received: (at 33612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2018 18:30:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUFSi-0006G6-7O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:30:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33873) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUFSg-0006Fo-MF for 33612@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:30:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUFSY-000884-R7 for 33612@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:30:17 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUFSY-000880-Nu; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:30:14 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1814 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gUFSY-000233-AU; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:30:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 20:30:08 +0200 Message-Id: <83zhtl87rj.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andreas Schwab In-reply-to: <87sgzdtbi6.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:03:45 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#33612: Gnus =?utf-8?Q?doesn=E2=80=99t?= display EBCDIC encoded mails correctly References: <87sgzdtbi6.fsf@igel.home> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33612 Cc: 33612@debbugs.gnu.org, qsx@chaotikum.eu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:03:45 +0100 > Cc: 33612@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Dez 04 2018, Thomas Schneider wrote: > > > So while the decoding routines work fine on more common charsets like > > UTF-8 and ISO 8859-1, they fail on EBCDIC. Not something likely to be > > encountered in real life, but still. > > Looks like Emacs doesn't know about IBM038 aka EBCDIC-INT. Other EBCDIC > encodings should work, though. Right, I just added IBM038 on master. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 22 09:14:42 2019 Received: (at 33612) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2019 13:14:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51242 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hefqr-0006Ve-UE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:14:42 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:40018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hefqm-0006VN-TW for 33612@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:14:40 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hefqj-0006EE-4g; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:14:35 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#33612: Gnus =?utf-8?Q?doesn=E2=80=99t?= display EBCDIC encoded mails correctly References: <87sgzdtbi6.fsf@igel.home> <83zhtl87rj.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:14:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83zhtl87rj.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 04 Dec 2018 20:30:08 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:03:45 +0100 >> Cc: 33612@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> On Dez 04 2018, Thomas Schneider wrote: >> >> > So while [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33612 Cc: Andreas Schwab , 33612@debbugs.gnu.org, qsx@chaotikum.eu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:03:45 +0100 >> Cc: 33612@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> On Dez 04 2018, Thomas Schneider wrote: >> >> > So while the decoding routines work fine on more common charsets like >> > UTF-8 and ISO 8859-1, they fail on EBCDIC. Not something likely to be >> > encountered in real life, but still. >> >> Looks like Emacs doesn't know about IBM038 aka EBCDIC-INT. Other EBCDIC >> encodings should work, though. > > Right, I just added IBM038 on master. And I used the test case posted here, and Gnus indeed now displays this message correctly. :-) So I'm closing the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 22 09:14:44 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2019 13:14:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hefqu-0006Vn-8N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:14:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:40034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hefqr-0006VY-Ed for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:14:41 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hefqo-0006EN-Vu for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:14:40 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:14:38 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #33612 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 33612 fixed close 33612 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 33612 fixed close 33612 27.1 quit From unknown Fri Aug 15 17:22:55 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator