GNU bug report logs - #33600
[PATCH 0/3] Defaulting to ci.guix.info (aka. berlin.guixsd.org)

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 15:45:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #151 received at 33600 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: Giovanni Biscuolo <g <at> xelera.eu>
Cc: guix-devel <at> gnu.org, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>, 33600 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: CDN performance
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 15:47:01 +0100
Hi Giovanni,

> for this very reason IMHO we should work towards a network of **very
> trusted** build farms directly managed and controlled by the GuixSD
> project sysadmins; if build farms will be able to quickly provide
> substitutes, caching mirrors will be _much more_ effective than today
>
> ... and a network of "automated guix challenge" servers to spot
> not-reproducible software in GuixSD
>
> with a solid infrastructure of "scientifically" trustable build farms,
> there are no reasons not to trust substitutes servers (this implies
> working towards 100% reproducibility of GuixSD)

This sets the bar very high.  I administer berlin.guix.info /
ci.guix.info (same server) and most of the associated build nodes, but I
don’t think people should trust these computers more than their own
computers or those managed by people they personally know.

The build servers do the same work that a user would do who builds
software locally without substitutes; the builders are supposed to
behave just like any other user.  (And we can challenge their authority
with “guix challenge”.)  I want us to keep in mind that build farms
don’t necessarily deserve any more trust than other computers you don’t
control.  Substitute servers are a convenience.

To improve distribution of binaries we are committed to working on
different strategies at the same time:

- improve our processes so that non-critical package changes only hit
  the master branch when we have already built the package and made it
  available for distribution.

- improve availability of the single server berlin.guix.info by hooking
  it up to a CDN via the name ci.guix.info (from which users can easily
  opt out by changing their default substitute server to
  berlin.guix.info).

- improve redundancy by setting up an off-site fail-over for the head of
  the build farm at berlin.guix.info (such as bayfront).

- distribute build artefacts over IPFS without requiring a central
  authority

All of these things can be done in parallel by different people.  This
increases the project’s resilience and the options that users can choose
from.

--
Ricardo





This bug report was last modified 6 years and 133 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.