GNU bug report logs - #33598
Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tim Gesthuizen <tim.gesthuizen <at> yahoo.de>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 33598 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:37:17 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 07.01.19 14:47, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Merged!
> 
>> : > +;;; Returns a package definition that packages an emacs-lisp file from the
>> : 
>> : "Return", not "Returns".
> 
> You forgot this!  Anyways, I was confused by the docstring, so I took the
> liberty to simplify it a little bit to the following:

Whoops... Maybe I did not reformat the patches.

>   "Return a package definition named PACKAGE-NAME that packages the Emacs Lisp
> SOURCE-FILES found in SOURCE-PACKAGE."
> 
> If you think this is missing something, let me know and I'll fix it.

Much better. That was probably just to straight forward for me.

> Oops, got too fast: there is a circular dependency problem because emacs.scm
> depends on llvm.scm.
> The function must be moved to some other place.  I'll place it in emacs utils or
> something.

So that is my "weird issue"!
I first packaged the function in emacs-utils.scm and experienced much
worse things. I suspected it to be a circular dependency as any package
using emacs-build-system includes emacs-utils under the hood and moved
it to packages/emacs.scm.
I thought it was something different because the same error appeared
there too.

Maybe we should have a file with "shortcuts" for package definitions of
special kind and place the function there?
I would claim that we would have the same problems in emacs-utils.scm.

Tim.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.