GNU bug report logs - #33598
Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename

Previous Next

Full log

Message #35 received at 33598 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tim Gesthuizen <tim.gesthuizen <at> yahoo.de>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 33598 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and
 emacs-clang-rename
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 23:00:52 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 19.12.2018 18:50, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> 
> Yeah, that makes sense.  Please send a new patch updated with the aforementioned
> recommendations and I'll merge.
> Thanks for the good work!
> 

Hi,
I had some problems packaging the changes because I had some really
weird issues with the guile modules (please validate that the patches
compile as expected).
They implement the discussed function for generating package definitions
for packages that contain only a single elisp file from another packages
source.
If the attached patches compile, they can be merged and work as
expected. If they cause weird errors to happen Pierre tries to find some
time to investigate into this.

Tim Gesthuizen.

[0001-gnu-Shrink-source-for-emacs-clang-format.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0002-gnu-Shrink-source-for-emacs-clang-rename.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0003-gnu-Add-package-from-clang-elisp-file.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0004-gnu-Add-package-elisp-from-package.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[0005-gnu-Use-package-elisp-from-package-for-clangs-emacs-.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.