GNU bug report logs - #33598
Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Tim Gesthuizen <tim.gesthuizen <at> yahoo.de>

Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:49:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Tim Gesthuizen <tim.gesthuizen <at> yahoo.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #23 received at 33598 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Tim Gesthuizen <tim.gesthuizen <at> yahoo.de>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 33598 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and
 emacs-clang-rename
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:09:44 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> I have searched a little bit in my store... Looks like its not the case.
> After all it seems to me that this is the purpose of a source snippet.

My understanding is that snippets are mostly meant as a Lispy way to replace
patches.

But hey, it's all Scheme code in the end, should it be executed before or after
does not make much of a difference.

> Yes. With the abstraction we could only import the function and do not
> need the emacs-build-system imported in modules that have nothing to do
> with emacs otherwise.

But you'll have to import the module where the abstraction is defined ;)

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 6 years and 185 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.