GNU bug report logs -
#33575
[PATCH] guix: lint: Add checker to check if inputs are sorted.
Previous Next
Reported by: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 07:43:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hello,
Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net> skribis:
> * guix/scripts/lint.scm (check-inputs-should-be-sorted): New procedure.
> (%checkers): Add it.
> ---
> guix/scripts/lint.scm | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/guix/scripts/lint.scm b/guix/scripts/lint.scm
> index 2314f3b28..37e8a1ec5 100644
> --- a/guix/scripts/lint.scm
> +++ b/guix/scripts/lint.scm
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> ;;; Copyright © 2017 Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com>
> ;;; Copyright © 2017 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
> ;;; Copyright © 2017 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
> +;;; Copyright © 2018 Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
> ;;;
> ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
> ;;;
> @@ -301,6 +302,22 @@ of a package, and INPUT-NAMES, a list of package specifications such as
> (package-input-intersection (package-direct-inputs package)
> input-names))))
>
> +(define (check-inputs-should-be-sorted package)
> + ;; Emit a warning if inputs, native inputs or propagated inputs of PACKAGE
> + ;; are not lexicographically ordered.
It’s something we rarely do so we’d get warnings for most packages. As
a side effect, people may pay less attention to what ‘guix lint’ says.
As for the goal itself, I think sorting is a good idea when there are
lots of inputs (things like IceCat), but otherwise I personally don’t
think it matters that much.
What do people think?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 155 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.