GNU bug report logs -
#33575
[PATCH] guix: lint: Add checker to check if inputs are sorted.
Previous Next
Reported by: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 07:43:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #26 received at 33575 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2018-12-08 04:51, iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org wrote:
> Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net> writes:
>
>> * guix/scripts/lint.scm (check-inputs-should-be-sorted): New procedure.
>> (%checkers): Add it.
>> [...]
>>
>> +(define (check-inputs-should-be-sorted package)
>> + ;; Emit a warning if inputs, native inputs or propagated inputs of PACKAGE
>> + ;; are not lexicographically ordered.
>
> Hello, consider 'gspell', it has some native-inputs for build and some
> for test:
>
> (native-inputs
> `(("glib" ,glib "bin")
> ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
> ("xmllint" ,libxml2)
>
> ;; For tests.
> ("aspell-dict-en" ,aspell-dict-en)
> ("xorg-server" ,xorg-server)))
>
> Currently I'd seperated them by a comment like this.
>
> If they are sorted, I have to add comment for each test input:
>
> `(("aspell-dict-en", aspecll-dict-en) ; for test
> ("glib" ,glib "bin")
> ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
> ("xmllint" ,libxml2)
> ("xorg-server" ,xorg-server)) ; for test
>
> Which will be a little annoying...
You convinced me sorting is a bad idea. Thanks for providing a good
argument :)
--
Cheers
Swedebugia
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 155 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.