From unknown Sun Jul 27 03:20:07 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#33509 <33509@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#33509 <33509@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" Reply-To: bug#33509 <33509@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 10:20:07 +0000 retitle 33509 core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.= 24" reassign 33509 guix submitter 33509 Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling severity 33509 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 26 06:55:45 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2018 11:55:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRFUP-0005Bu-5p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:55:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRFUN-0005Bh-EG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:55:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRFUC-0001YQ-AR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:55:38 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:32872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRFUB-0001Xg-5D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:55:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRFUA-0005NK-9i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:55:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRFU6-0001So-AW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:55:30 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:50382 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRFU4-0001QX-43 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:55:24 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu (p508AC390.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.138.195.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1057840145 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 12:55:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 12:55:15 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: Subject: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" Message-ID: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/wYjiIJoAC6YrN=Cg62VkGgT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) --Sig_/wYjiIJoAC6YrN=Cg62VkGgT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On core-updates the package arc-theme fails: starting phase `configure' source directory: "/tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-20170= 302"=20 build directory: "/tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-201703= 02" configure flags: ("CONFIG_SHELL=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk= 43-bash configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-fast-install checking for a BSD-compatible install... /gnu/store/5s2nib1lrd2101bbrivcl17= kjx1m checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /gnu/store/5s2nib1lrd2101bbrivcl17kj= x1msp checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... no checking whether make supports nested variables... yes checking for pkg-config... /gnu/store/xyiyf12w4i7zf5g5b4ah0bi1mmd6i8xa-pkg-= confi checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes configure: error: Invalid GNOME version: 3.24 It seams that only GNOME versions until 3.22 are valid. Nix has a workaround that sets the version down: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/165fa89762d7156bb3f2774cd3ff0d40cd0= a9606 If I set the version hard to 3.22 the package builds again successfully: - '(#:phases + '(#:configure-flags + '("--with-gnome=3D3.22") + #:phases Is it legitimate to patch it like that or do we need more tests? Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/wYjiIJoAC6YrN=Cg62VkGgT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlv73yQACgkQvyhstlk+X/0tcQCgrWm6xQf6aKoPJO812SjaNABa eigAnjNLYNhOcgApGASMzBEMBrTYuUuE =pVrj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wYjiIJoAC6YrN=Cg62VkGgT-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 26 16:00:44 2018 Received: (at 33509) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2018 21:00:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50180 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRNzn-0003hA-Oo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:00:43 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:36946) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRNzk-0003gv-8i for 33509@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:00:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [5.102.239.133]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2551C400C5; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:00:33 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= Subject: Re: bug#33509: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" Message-ID: <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> References: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Op27XXJsWz80g3oF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33509 Cc: 33509@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --Op27XXJsWz80g3oF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > On core-updates the package arc-theme fails: >=20 > starting phase `configure' > source directory: "/tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-201= 70302"=20 > build directory: "/tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-2017= 0302" > configure flags: ("CONFIG_SHELL=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29= qk43-bash > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-fast-install > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /gnu/store/5s2nib1lrd2101bbrivcl= 17kjx1m > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /gnu/store/5s2nib1lrd2101bbrivcl17= kjx1msp > checking for gawk... gawk > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... no > checking whether make supports nested variables... yes > checking for pkg-config... /gnu/store/xyiyf12w4i7zf5g5b4ah0bi1mmd6i8xa-pk= g-confi > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > configure: error: Invalid GNOME version: 3.24 >=20 > It seams that only GNOME versions until 3.22 are valid. >=20 > Nix has a workaround that sets the version down: >=20 > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/165fa89762d7156bb3f2774cd3ff0d40c= d0a9606 >=20 > If I set the version hard to 3.22 the package builds again > successfully: >=20 > - '(#:phases > + '(#:configure-flags > + '("--with-gnome=3D3.22") > + #:phases >=20 > Is it legitimate to patch it like that or do we need more tests? >=20 > Bj=C3=B6rn >=20 I'd look into if you can use (version-major+minor (package-version gnome)) so it doesn't have to be updated. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Op27XXJsWz80g3oF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlv8XuwACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GhmBAArdWgCP2JR6lz9RZskHyGgUsBcmdqAygR8F1vr5OT3L8/vFDGhqakSvWs Rbc88LNC1bkuomlpmye9AwpnV3YLW/sOIDEIav2hp/hDTBNIPipA3NFOKB0kLIjx jgxkFrlejoCYJwvfQ1WEvF9q33YqAtB5mlthPVyi5WjMcG11FFMYr8yHY2bjiSQy xPBygEOK+s2FIAlb89agaQF56JrE/FzNNsrTgZQghBpK/Zxux9MAakDHsD51+d06 aVKvxnVMiCj2qw0mg3/A4mEWscX1GZyDMGt1r566tFJLl65fU4c36MJpOSb3xBe8 +RhFnuHft3nY8C8O1vIsDTx/oKblsuxPVM2Xo/IdKaaiFf28/DbVaKoAr7eNnkTz TLRsikC2aIMJF5y+ic3kHY/AnepSMfXT/VPks/Ga61dmctMDV2NwubK+Msp7v2TC DA1IBnln+mGJcridzvbgBeMXAS7Uq9zb4OHN7lKiG/b5rL6KpjSAhVGK42TaZn5R m1nSait+3qm3WsanXWSPiSspbtasoY7JSB3EkN6UoeWSN7k7OW5HUzWC40sKbVa0 z9G2P3mo36cV4TGgSkqV0+lbWot54t9UJujV7ra3mnq1DPZwjUAIcpMazo5BJe2y 1qmNLcvySsspf/bLgJYlSsShPeKG8eGGYxMENth+A/utpcFvOss= =JWR4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Op27XXJsWz80g3oF-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 27 10:07:56 2018 Received: (at 33509) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2018 15:07:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRexw-0005Vh-6p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:07:56 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:35938 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRext-0005VY-E4 for 33509@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:07:54 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu (p508AC390.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.138.195.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB1723FFC5; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:07:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:07:45 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: bug#33509: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" Message-ID: <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> References: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/vrcVbQqepTOlpPUB.JEn+_R"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33509 Cc: 33509@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --Sig_/vrcVbQqepTOlpPUB.JEn+_R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:00:33 +0200 Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > > On core-updates the package arc-theme fails: > >=20 > > starting phase `configure' > > source directory: > > "/tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-20170302" build > > directory: > > "/tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-20170302" > > configure flags: > > ("CONFIG_SHELL=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-fast-install > > checking for a BSD-compatible > > install... /gnu/store/5s2nib1lrd2101bbrivcl17kjx1m checking whether > > build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir > > -p... /gnu/store/5s2nib1lrd2101bbrivcl17kjx1msp checking for > > gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... no checking > > whether make supports nested variables... yes checking for > > pkg-config... /gnu/store/xyiyf12w4i7zf5g5b4ah0bi1mmd6i8xa-pkg-confi > > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes configure: > > error: Invalid GNOME version: 3.24 > >=20 > > It seams that only GNOME versions until 3.22 are valid. > >=20 > > Nix has a workaround that sets the version down: > >=20 > > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/165fa89762d7156bb3f2774cd3ff0d4= 0cd0a9606 > >=20 > > If I set the version hard to 3.22 the package builds again > > successfully: > >=20 > > - '(#:phases > > + '(#:configure-flags > > + '("--with-gnome=3D3.22") > > + #:phases > >=20 > > Is it legitimate to patch it like that or do we need more tests? > >=20 > > Bj=C3=B6rn > > =20 >=20 > I'd look into if you can use (version-major+minor (package-version > gnome)) so it doesn't have to be updated. >=20 >=20 Hi Efraim, I don't know what you mean with "so it doesn't have to be updated"? I mean changing the package definition is an update? Also, I don't know what your intention with "version-major+minor" is? On core-updates the current version of gnome is "3.24.3". Then (version-major+minor gnome-version) would still evaluate to 3.24, which IS too big, 3.22 is the maximum accepted version.=20 Let me explain a bit more: With adding "--with-gnome=3D3.22" we are pretending the configure-script that we will use gnome-3.22, although we still use the latest version (To be precise, we use gtk+, but that seams to report the gnome-version with pkg-config).=20 This version number is then used to search in the directory /tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-20170302/common/gtk-3.0 the matching "major.minor" version, choosing the right theme. 3.22 is already symlinking to 3.20, and that is the highest available real directory. So we might get wrong look&feel here, because it is not adapted to GNOME 3.24. But there is no further development upstream anyway. If it doesn't look totally malformed, we can use it like that. My disk is a bit full, I can't do a vm-image with it currently. Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/vrcVbQqepTOlpPUB.JEn+_R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlv9XcIACgkQvyhstlk+X/1aogCeJ3h4Z1De2ILQKQDT1SdAkA9U FGoAnjfewSOjhRZh08wuFoVK/gW8iy+1 =mXKq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vrcVbQqepTOlpPUB.JEn+_R-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 27 11:06:26 2018 Received: (at 33509) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2018 16:06:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRfsX-00070Y-LJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:06:25 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:38810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRfsW-00070L-G7 for 33509@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:06:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [5.102.239.133]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 854B040134; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:06:17 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= Subject: Re: bug#33509: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" Message-ID: <20181127160617.GA17277@macbook41> References: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33509 Cc: 33509@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:00:33 +0200 > Efraim Flashner wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > > > On core-updates the package arc-theme fails: > > >=20 > > > starting phase `configure' > > > source directory: > > > "/tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-20170302" build > > > directory: > > > "/tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-20170302" > > > configure flags: > > > ("CONFIG_SHELL=3D/gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash > > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-fast-install > > > checking for a BSD-compatible > > > install... /gnu/store/5s2nib1lrd2101bbrivcl17kjx1m checking whether > > > build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir > > > -p... /gnu/store/5s2nib1lrd2101bbrivcl17kjx1msp checking for > > > gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... no checking > > > whether make supports nested variables... yes checking for > > > pkg-config... /gnu/store/xyiyf12w4i7zf5g5b4ah0bi1mmd6i8xa-pkg-confi > > > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes configure: > > > error: Invalid GNOME version: 3.24 > > >=20 > > > It seams that only GNOME versions until 3.22 are valid. > > >=20 > > > Nix has a workaround that sets the version down: > > >=20 > > > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/165fa89762d7156bb3f2774cd3ff0= d40cd0a9606 > > >=20 > > > If I set the version hard to 3.22 the package builds again > > > successfully: > > >=20 > > > - '(#:phases > > > + '(#:configure-flags > > > + '("--with-gnome=3D3.22") > > > + #:phases > > >=20 > > > Is it legitimate to patch it like that or do we need more tests? > > >=20 > > > Bj=C3=B6rn > > > =20 > >=20 > > I'd look into if you can use (version-major+minor (package-version > > gnome)) so it doesn't have to be updated. > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > Hi Efraim, >=20 > I don't know what you mean with "so it doesn't have to be updated"? I > mean changing the package definition is an update? >=20 > Also, I don't know what your intention with "version-major+minor" is? > On core-updates the current version of gnome is "3.24.3". > Then (version-major+minor gnome-version) would still evaluate to 3.24, > which IS too big, 3.22 is the maximum accepted version.=20 >=20 > Let me explain a bit more: With adding "--with-gnome=3D3.22" we are > pretending the configure-script that we will use gnome-3.22, although > we still use the latest version (To be precise, we use gtk+, but that > seams to report the gnome-version with pkg-config).=20 >=20 > This version number is then used to search in the directory >=20 > /tmp/guix-build-arc-theme-20170302.drv-0/arc-theme-20170302/common/gtk-3.0 >=20 > the matching "major.minor" version, choosing the right theme. >=20 > 3.22 is already symlinking to 3.20, and that is the highest available > real directory. >=20 > So we might get wrong look&feel here, because it is not adapted to > GNOME 3.24. But there is no further development upstream anyway. If it > doesn't look totally malformed, we can use it like that. My disk is a > bit full, I can't do a vm-image with it currently. >=20 > Bj=C3=B6rn >=20 I see, I misunderstood and thought we were hardcoding 3.22 based on the version of gnome, not based on the version string the configure script is looking for. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlv9a3UACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1E3eg/+KfaOrwIHschBiDqEJMflrb1R721HWZdRhNWwQZCiDNja+3Ad2r5nfyUH tWXodfIotmD7YXyX1v0CifiV8tW6TIxrCZcR+Z3xyJjN1S8EF81BYadiWx9RZeud N43JVTkAz+AQSGiDg98RCu8JsYOBrY8giLR3D0FvKG7snHP8yi5utRZhId3p5DRX uZLXUpMRtsY81zOSGF/oK+ZRx1lXGCKKt9RgQAqEcZNjx5cU8eHCR3r2gYBfXp3Q Exu/3E80hpoXrnTVixbOR6Ny4UY+646fhwImi6al+yd8tlN+tz8No7l+78vJoSL9 xreNhZMuB5t+P8ZjTc5J+zdNcAV0ghBS5nb+ofSvrW+KuecWnz5ugMQDRD+RX8Rv +ZYg+dP1VPAYtXc9txJLZ4zAS/El1PIncOUZlI0PtYWfFkAavQn3ofTNlmSUdJOX KG8XbNNnXEoP2nigVRDk1LqHQe6X6vrkwZKxNRXzJiijfT7KlbjF5LO2mffDYaq0 661Opa8vADsuUtRKwgbiAlEIpZonDv7PlYuhkU1QzP/6cGH2WpvZy23ybtiX7J1Z O0ugOHnFDOVK+/j1vmQ4fvQOr8JsOirxXkScefAvc9VMZct/K/ncvzai6j4xAMxj IwMCjGHq9R+hdwNbC1VuJySM9LLF0wryC8Jjxo6CU19mP2lfviw= =N8JF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 27 18:57:29 2018 Received: (at 33509) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2018 23:57:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRnEP-0001d8-6l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:57:29 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:35966 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRnEN-0001cz-Jl for 33509@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:57:28 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu (p508AC390.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.138.195.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8BDD40145; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:57:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:24:15 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#33509: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" Message-ID: <20181128002415.64970ecd@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <878t1e4072.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> <878t1e4072.fsf@elephly.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/Bd7b+6T8ost7he/Qim63GCE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33509 Cc: Efraim Flashner , 33509@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --Sig_/Bd7b+6T8ost7he/Qim63GCE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:36:49 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hi Bj=C3=B6rn, >=20 > > So we might get wrong look&feel here, because it is not adapted to > > GNOME 3.24. But there is no further development upstream anyway. If > > it doesn't look totally malformed, we can use it like that. My disk > > is a bit full, I can't do a vm-image with it currently. =20 >=20 > This is only going to get worse as we already have a later version of > GNOME in a branch, which is just waiting for the core-updates merge. >=20 > If the package sees no further development we may want to drop it. > What do you think? I have no opinion about that package. I don't know it, I just saw that compile-error on core-updates and tried to fix it. With your question, I double checked that this is really dead and found in the bug tracker a link to a new, active fork: https://github.com/NicoHood/arc-theme They claim they are Arch/Debian/Ubuntu maintainers. I can try to prepare a patch for that. In the meantime, I try to test it. Do you know how to do that? Is installing the package enough, and then running gnome-tweak-tool? Or does it have to go into system-packages? Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/Bd7b+6T8ost7he/Qim63GCE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlv90iAACgkQvyhstlk+X/0p9gCgrk6OhZW0JEmfetW15LREqZ6L 3r4AoI6bOfkOpRSylyAnHxy7EhNIoP9J =FDmd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Bd7b+6T8ost7he/Qim63GCE-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 28 01:23:34 2018 Received: (at 33509) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2018 06:23:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRtG2-0006Z2-DZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:23:34 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21145) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRtG0-0006Yt-7p for 33509@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:23:32 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543358214; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=oKKuY+c2mDnVB030429/fUSRpPMKabgVH09QMjgYLvWTJnDIArybvmvqwOb8EiO2/poLg6R2eHJGsqtHMGtI7aXeJRnUbrghXN051avbRja925XTd8KmEGhTiLMi+7+bkjU40TPCpNyEeQJo7590bGMrJlJOQIouL7m7eOMKllY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1543358214; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To:ARC-Authentication-Results; bh=GKsy9Jca5cQTn3GsduoipwvJ37Whn1hH+jtSHBidwFQ=; b=T4zqB5tVTKO0CRipGMgflaICye972ef1iWz/0RrtDpft0o2fb0ZFFnVpjSRjP5+Zy98Jn+n4N6cV+4ynXGkc72ZEFJ7SYE65cHoJEutrZCuflJ1MDKcDmMSNEbWM+Q4hEELiYhDZEKDgBFFo0+gPv3YwWB06Myb9Z2F9/8RFZp4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1543358214; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=539; bh=GKsy9Jca5cQTn3GsduoipwvJ37Whn1hH+jtSHBidwFQ=; b=Uws2fuyKmeNvbwVI7au2D/zJkABnMUU8o2Yuxb45QAlLuqGY/shK67lNWh7GH4Ng 5zuJq8pd73BbVHYDQYAp8eiLLoDJOvO3eevyQeQBfH2do3YeQGKxL4dh+ehPkFNlrEU T5x+UNrcYJOJNYeiDwRH78HQSIVDEkTtbx4PgkMU= Received: from localhost (p578E7EB3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.142.126.179]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1543358213623679.7985986966147; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:36:53 -0800 (PST) References: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: Re: bug#33509: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" In-reply-to: <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:36:49 +0100 Message-ID: <878t1e4072.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33509 Cc: Efraim Flashner , 33509@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Bj=C3=B6rn, > So we might get wrong look&feel here, because it is not adapted to > GNOME 3.24. But there is no further development upstream anyway. If it > doesn't look totally malformed, we can use it like that. My disk is a > bit full, I can't do a vm-image with it currently. This is only going to get worse as we already have a later version of GNOME in a branch, which is just waiting for the core-updates merge. If the package sees no further development we may want to drop it. What do you think? -- Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 28 18:53:58 2018 Received: (at 33509) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2018 23:53:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53911 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gS9eY-0003z3-AI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:53:58 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:36000 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gS9eX-0003yv-3x for 33509@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:53:57 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu (p508AC390.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.138.195.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56B623FFC5; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:53:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:53:54 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#33509: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" Message-ID: <20181129005354.02148264@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <20181128002415.64970ecd@alma-ubu> References: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> <878t1e4072.fsf@elephly.net> <20181128002415.64970ecd@alma-ubu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/_WSnQwO.EzHXVw3MAzkUaXY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33509 Cc: 33509@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --Sig_/_WSnQwO.EzHXVw3MAzkUaXY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:24:15 +0100 Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > With your question, I double checked that this is really dead and > found in the bug tracker a link to a new, active fork: >=20 > https://github.com/NicoHood/arc-theme >=20 Patch submitted as: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D33546 Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/_WSnQwO.EzHXVw3MAzkUaXY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlv/KpMACgkQvyhstlk+X/1gfACfdxUHLp/mKQ1lys7vOSVklJfJ baoAnRP1oY+YPlaXoyZe48Z3FmoRqV7V =B+/r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_WSnQwO.EzHXVw3MAzkUaXY-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 06 12:37:09 2018 Received: (at 33509-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2018 17:37:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35987 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUxaH-0001uG-6p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 12:37:09 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com ([209.85.166.54]:41965) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUxaE-0001ts-Pn for 33509-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 12:37:07 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id s22so1011127ioc.8 for <33509-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:37:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2/6hEj/S7eLA2EBybP6HkDGgnNrPMeKDZT6va7TQsLE=; b=h1Q5UgQSJfMB9TI+jnvzc/SRrSwiypvbNY3PgRpFOqT5tML6fESEfnSFZu9AqzXYMp uteEk+dBLlGdUzzuFJFlp7CrWCfrcKgWKmni16Rnim6ZA0e1HC8p0tFyVM9Ewrv+UrMe m+Efx1OnSGcWOYTPxOUZPolowUf9cGIYDLc/loV62R0jV5OAa5gpfTXzYEi6IWeueE5m EFTdkE8e2vYBKEVvNI+W9ZHpXqfS+18OWsp2C2BmXUYY8HbLOoLLpfH1Gicmj/65y9kh kcTl8VI47GzjvLwO9Hd0sKOipOMYqNjsD+naXDAkuJsZbcHVfRoZx/HuON9Z6KOA55gX aFcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2/6hEj/S7eLA2EBybP6HkDGgnNrPMeKDZT6va7TQsLE=; b=ca0etMUiOl77PNpOb16HN7LwiTeVBH8qvFZfhdJPkmFDm1CkmptjYOTyT/zuQq30Fo BvLeq3BGi733C/bWgWAiH0JEJQbDt4xddPkub4ZkSE6CbifQPrWlgczKPG3dMD/qvOIr Cvw5bjJUcFtOYstepi74Nxx19LWtj4CLuOMh9/2x2HvJ1Gkbqe+Dz6DNAUyA7INrymlg mkghgGq6fNWIp/SYOz0Ed/zzOxpK2aD5E9Cw4Rye6i8a7wGvRYiOevohwPIPr7IMDjfY e0zZFJr/rs1gIT2v7g3JBoiZ5DEn8aNzQnphAd4JQt9fT/Br1GNVMw9A+MQBOTUnA+Tp IRAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWY9NxWL/pNVfQN01Dsfa4SRXyzFc/i9xoHkFzPIMBZe4BG30Mdo y/+V+b7blXlLsoePwVOkedNu03GKPeU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WVyAo/MoVYybMbQ2Q+7vfPMlrbv6+fRzL/dJTps3NSNBHX7S+CaulAxJ6bFEp766Mhchj8fA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d005:: with SMTP id x5mr25424809ioa.46.1544117821174; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from apteryx ([45.72.138.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c21sm377669iob.22.2018.12.06.09.37.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:37:00 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer X-Google-Original-From: Maxim Cournoyer To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: Re: bug#33509: core-updates: arc-theme fails with "Invalid GNOME version: 3.24" References: <20181126125515.5dee070e@alma-ubu> <20181126210033.GI28778@macbook41> <20181127160745.2f994639@alma-ubu> <878t1e4072.fsf@elephly.net> <20181128002415.64970ecd@alma-ubu> <20181129005354.02148264@alma-ubu> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 12:36:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20181129005354.02148264@alma-ubu> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Bj=C3=B6rn?= =?utf-8?Q?_H=C3=B6fling=22's?= message of "Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:53:54 +0100") Message-ID: <874lbqo8uc.fsf@apteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33509-done Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 33509-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling writes: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:24:15 +0100 > Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > >> With your question, I double checked that this is really dead and >> found in the bug tracker a link to a new, active fork: >>=20 >> https://github.com/NicoHood/arc-theme >>=20 > > Patch submitted as: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D33546 > > Bj=C3=B6rn Tested OK and merged. Thank you :-) Maxim From unknown Sun Jul 27 03:20:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator