Subject: Re: [bug#33436] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-warcio.

From: swedebugia <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 03:01:29 +0100

On 2019-01-11 09:29, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Ping!
> 
> [email-masked] (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> 
>> Hello!
>>
>> swedebugia <[email-masked]> skribis:
>>
>>>> >From 537b2b111a464956bdec640ea5f84c4598ea66f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: swedebugia <[email-masked]>
>>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:37:46 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-warcio.
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/python.scm: New variable.
>>                            ^
>> Nitpick: You forgot the variable name here.  :-)
>>
>>> +   (arguments
>>> +    ;; FIXME: Some tests require network access. 150 out of 1354 fail
>>> +    '(#:tests? #f))
>>
>> Could you investigate a bit further?  What do the test logs show?
>>
>> It would be good to see if these tests can be easily fixed, if they
>> should definitely be skipped (for instance because they rely on some
>> external service), or if it’s something else.
>>
>>> +   (home-page "https://github.com/webrecorder/warcio")
>>> +   (synopsis "Streaming web archival archive (WARC) library")
>>> +   (description
>>> +    "warcio is designed for fast, low-level access to web archival
>>                  ^^
>> What about: “warcio is a Python library to read and write the WARC format
>> commonly used in Web archives.  It is designed for…”?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ludo’.
Here comes the log from the build.

I see a lot of "OSError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor" and a few
"FileNotFoundError"

Should I report upstream?

-- 
Cheers Swedebugia